You Asked and You Will Now Get D3 vs The Totally Awesome Mk III Pics!!!

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=, Sep 27, 2007.

  1. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=, Sep 27, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=

    Rich Guest

    Rich, Sep 27, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=

    Matt Ion Guest

    Matt Ion, Sep 28, 2007
    #3
  4. Sorry. Here's a prototype of Canon's new strap. Definitely more refined
    than what Nikon has.

    <http://cgi.ebay.com/_W0QQitemZ140162749954>





    Rita
     
    =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=, Sep 28, 2007
    #4
  5. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=

    Noons Guest

    Noons, Sep 28, 2007
    #5
  6. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=

    Paul Furman Guest

    Paul Furman, Sep 28, 2007
    #6
  7. Absolutely! These dumbass nitwits are comparing apples to dirt. The Mk III
    is deadly sharp when a Nikkor is used. That forum seems to be filled with
    whiners. I don't think they are giving the Mk III a fair shake.





    Rita
     
    =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=, Sep 28, 2007
    #7
  8. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=

    Paul Furman Guest

    Also the Canon had a longer zoom range, slower lens. But still the
    difference is striking. Even if the Canon was maybe focused on the
    background, the background has more detail too. And less noise.
     
    Paul Furman, Sep 28, 2007
    #8
  9. That's true! I think the Mk III is definitely going to be a formidable foe.
    I'm still amazed at its mind-blowing performance and dynamic range.






    Rita
     
    =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rita_=C4_Berkowitz?=, Sep 29, 2007
    #9
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.