Why can't I EXPLORE an image using Acronis True Image ver. 8?

Every time I try to explore an image, I get the message, "cannot assign
a drive letter to a partition from the image archive."

I'm using XP Pro w/FAT 32 (SP2 with all the current updates)

The images I'm trying to explore are not in a Secure Zone. They are on
a couple of outboard drives.

In the window to select the image to be explored there is a FAT 32 & a
FAT 16 partition shown.

I have tried assigning drive letters to each partition and it doesn't
work.

I have tried assigning a drive letter to only a single partition and it
doesn't work.

I have been able to do this in the past, but I always had a problem
doing it. It was never as simple as the HELP section makes it seem.

Also, does anyone know of a simpler program to back up an entire C:
drive?

One like the old Drive Image for FAT 16 drives?

That program didn't have all the fancy frills, but it was so simple a
5-year-old could do it, and it worked flawlessly every time. All these
bells and whistles in these new backups like Acronis TI are just too
complicated.

Thank you.

 

In news:,
<> typed:
> Every time I try to explore an image, I get the message, "cannot
> assign a drive letter to a partition from the image archive."
>
> I'm using XP Pro w/FAT 32 (SP2 with all the current updates)
>
> The images I'm trying to explore are not in a Secure Zone. They are on
> a couple of outboard drives.
>
> In the window to select the image to be explored there is a FAT 32 & a
> FAT 16 partition shown.
>
> I have tried assigning drive letters to each partition and it doesn't
> work.
>
> I have tried assigning a drive letter to only a single partition and
> it doesn't work.
>
> I have been able to do this in the past, but I always had a problem
> doing it. It was never as simple as the HELP section makes it seem.
>
> Also, does anyone know of a simpler program to back up an entire C:
> drive?
>
> One like the old Drive Image for FAT 16 drives?
>
> That program didn't have all the fancy frills, but it was so simple a
> 5-year-old could do it, and it worked flawlessly every time. All these
> bells and whistles in these new backups like Acronis TI are just too
> complicated.
>
> Thank you.

Seen this? - http://selfimage.excelcia.org/ .

 

Re: I AM WAITING FOR THAT *HAG* OF YOURS MAX HAG HOUND. I GOT MYSUSPICIONS ABOUT THAT HAG AND YOU, YOU HAG.

Utter wrote:

<plank>

 

Re: I AM WAITING FOR THAT *HAG* OF YOURS MAX HAG HOUND. I GOT MY SUSPICIONS ABOUT THAT HAG AND YOU, YOU HAG.

Maximum Hag wrote:
> Utter wrote:
>
> <plank> <BITCHSLAP @ BUHane tard>

*PLOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINK*

 

Re: For a *Clogged* Tolit Bowl use..........

Use DrainClogHagHo wrote:

<snipped>

nothing worth reading

<hag>

 

Re: For a *Maximum *Hog* *Ho* Tolit Bowl use..........

Maximum *Hog* *Ho* wrote:
> Use DrainClogHagHo wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> nothing worth reading
>
> <hag>

<hog>
http://www.fiberstock.com/images/products/hogGreyQ.jpg

 

Re: For a *Maximum *Hog* *Ho* Tolit Bowl use..........

"Clogwog" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Maximum *Hog* *Ho* wrote:
> > Use DrainClogHagHo wrote:
> >
> > <snipped>
> >
> > nothing worth reading
> >
> > <hag>
>
> <hog>
> http://www.fiberstock.com/images/products/hogGreyQ.jpg
>
>
>

 

Re: For a *Maximum *Hog* *Ho* Tolit Bowl use..........

"Clogwog" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Maximum *Hog* *Ho* wrote:
> > Use DrainClogHagHo wrote:
> >
> > <snipped>
> >
> > nothing worth reading
> >
> > <hag>
>
> <hog>
> http://www.fiberstock.com/images/products/hogGreyQ.jpg
>
>
>

 

Re: I should call the EPA on your ass, because you're weak wasteand can't come up with nothing on your own.

ToxicClogHag running from the EPA wrote:

<snipped>

You're boring ToxicClogHag go home.

http://www.fotosearch.com/comp/ICL/ICL151/SKC_042.jpg

<hag>

 

Re: For a *Maximum *Hog* *Ho* Tolit Bowl use..........

Maximum Hog Ho wrote:
> ToxicClogHag running from the EPA wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> You're boring ToxicClogHag go home.

Make me!
>
> http://www.fotosearch.com/comp/ICL/ICL151/SKC_042.jpg
>
> <hag>

<hog>

LMFAO @ you!
http://www.angelfire.com/psy/doctorbill/Buhane.jpg

 

Re: For you, it's an auto *plank* really not even worth a read ---period.

<plank>