What "white-balance" has least light blockage?

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Walter Dnes (delete the 'z' to get my real address, Aug 28, 2006.

  1. Another low-light photography question... I assume that one setting of
    white-balance (sunny day, cloudy day, tungsten light, flourescent light,
    etc) attempts to collect all available light; and that other settings
    result from reducing one or more portions of the visible spectrum. Is
    that assumption correct? Does "Cool" versus "Warm" setting make any

    And is there any setting that is generally the best light-collection,
    or does it vary greatly amongst different camera models? For low-light
    shooting, I prefer correcting colour balance after the fact, versus not
    getting all available light.
    Walter Dnes (delete the 'z' to get my real address, Aug 28, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  2. If you are shooting raw the WB can be adjusted in the raw converter, so the
    WB setting on the actual camera should not make much difference.
    Adrian Boliston, Aug 28, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  3. "Walter Dnes (delete the 'z' to get my real address)"
    Correct, in the sense that they all use all the light that the sensor
    Not correct. The white balancing is a postprocessing operation, so
    with appropriate software you can do the same after-the-fact. That
    works best when shooting Raw images.
    Only on camera JPEGs (and thumbnails), and as a tag in the file data
    which records the default setting for preview.
    For the best file quality, you need to use lens filters to bring your
    results closer to how you want the result to look. That can generally
    require longer exposure times, but that also gives lower noise
    Bart van der Wolf, Aug 28, 2006
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.