Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Annika1980, Jan 25, 2004.

  1. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, Jan 25, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. David J. Littleboy, Jan 25, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. George Preddy, Jan 27, 2004
  4. Annika1980

    George Kerby Guest

    Oh Hell. You're back.
    I thought you went to crap and the hogs ate you.
    George Kerby, Jan 27, 2004
  5. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, Jan 28, 2004
  6. Annika1980

    Jeff Shoaf Guest

    The hogs hurt themselves on all of his over-sharpened false edges...
    Jeff Shoaf, Jan 28, 2004
  7. Did you take it with a 25MP digital back? Why not post it?
    George Preddy, Jan 28, 2004
  8. Aren't you going to post the original?

    How about posting 2 at original size? 1 with the normal Bayer digital
    sharpening bandaids applied, and 1 before any attempts to digitially savage
    the pic.
    George Preddy, Jan 28, 2004
  9. Why, don't you like the image? Do you think wasting more bandwidth will make
    it a better composition?

    Bart van der Wolf, Jan 28, 2004
  10. I do, but at 0.3MP it isn't very useful.
    George Preddy, Jan 28, 2004
  11. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    No, I took it with a TRUE 6.3 MP camera!
    Not that yellow extrapolated crap that Sigma puts out.
    Annika1980, Jan 30, 2004
  12. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    From: "George Preddy"
    You saw the pic didn't you?
    That's all the use I wanted out of it.
    If I posted all my pics full-sized they'd be hanging on living rooms walls all
    over the world .... and I'd still be broke!
    Annika1980, Jan 30, 2004
  13. Yes, it was 0.3MP which is is obviously useless.
    Unless you overlayed a "proof" watermark like every pro who isn't
    afraid/embarrased to share the quality their clients can expect. Post that
    one full size straight out of camera that way, lets have a look.
    George Preddy, Jan 31, 2004
  14. Annika1980

    Lionel Guest

    Um, George? - Has nobody explained to you yet that Pbase subscribers
    have limited amounts of storage available? The free trial accounts are
    limited to 10MB. Want to know how many full size 10D photos you can fit
    in that amount of space? - *Maybe* two photos.
    (Ref: <http://www.pbase.com/pricing.html>)
    Only someone as moronic (or obsessive) as you would waste an entire
    Pbase account on one or two photos. Mind you, if you have a low
    resolution camera like the SD9, the file sizes will be much smaller than
    that, so of course you can put plenty of full-size photos online - if
    you're clueless enough to think that it's smart to put full-res photos
    on a website in the first place, seeing as very few people will be
    running their browser on a 2000x3000+ pixel display.
    Lionel, Jan 31, 2004
  15. Annika1980

    Lionel Guest

    It's not meant to be 'useful' to /you/, George. If it's going to be
    'useful' to someone, that'll be Annika. I seriously doubt that he
    considers making it easy for people to rip off his images is 'useful' in
    any way.
    Lionel, Jan 31, 2004
  16. Annika1980

    Lionel Guest

    If it's *that* important to you to have a full size version, I suggest
    that you offer to pay him for it. Photographers only go to the effort of
    watermarking & handing out full-size proof of photos when they have some
    expectation of being paid for the real thing.
    Lionel, Jan 31, 2004
  17. Annika1980

    Lionel Guest

    When are *you* going to post an SD9 or 10 image that hasn't been
    artifically sharpened by the Foveon hardware/software? I haven't yet
    seen you point out a Foveon image that doesn't have sharpening halos
    around the fine detail.
    Lionel, Jan 31, 2004
  18. Pay him to see that his camera produces nothing but junk at 6M interpolated
    recorded output pixels? No thanks.
    George Preddy, Jan 31, 2004
  19. 0.3MP is useless to anyone.
    George Preddy, Jan 31, 2004
  20. Name: Bret Douglas (joined 01-Apr-2002) (pbase supporter)

    Next excuse?

    The fact is that massive downsizing is required for this image (and it's
    still slighty blurry). Everything you whine about short of him simply
    posting a professional quality 6MP proof as it came out of camera, simply
    reinforces the fact that the 10D is a very blurry 1.5 full color MP
    DSLR--best case.

    A $620 10.3MP SD9 wouldn't have ruined that fine effort, it would be sharp
    as a tack full size.
    George Preddy, Jan 31, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.