Ugly noise versus "good" noise

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Rich, Oct 4, 2005.

  1. Rich

    Rich Guest

    Well maybe not good. The sample shots on for the new
    Olympus E-500 are characterized (800 ISO and up) by what I'd term,
    "good" noise. It's not the big, blotchy noise "particles" you see in
    some cameras, but noise more like high speed colour negative film
    grain. It's also easier to eliminate using noise programs like
    "Neat Image." I was able to get rid of the noise in the 1600 ISO
    shot of the gold jar and not destroy the fine detail in the image.
    However, ugly noise, usually big, blotchy and replete with jpeg image
    flaws occurs when some cameras are used at high ISO.
    Rich, Oct 4, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Rich

    Sheldon Guest

    I'm with you. When noise resembles grain it really doesn't bother me.
    Sheldon, Oct 5, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Rich

    Ron Hunter Guest

    Yes, large splotchy noise is worse, but noise is noise, and given a
    choice, I would certainly rather not have EITHER.
    Ron Hunter, Oct 5, 2005
  4. Rich

    Rich Guest

    Hey, I wish the 20D had spot metering, then I could buy one.
    We don't always get what we want.
    Rich, Oct 6, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.