TOT: Snooper's Charter

How many of them have full uncrypted databases loaded?

 

I awaited and got the denial of the facts (again). You need to better
comprehend the written word Rod. Here's a clip[ of the article in The
Telegraph -"Companies are reported to be increasingly using number
plate-reading cameras mounted high in the air"

 

Not many, but some will have unprotected access to cloud accounts.

 

After his latest reply and pseudo lawyer crap he's in mine.

 

And how many uncrypted databases are there in the cloud?

 

More than would qualify as "rare and newsworthy".

 

You're lying thru your teeth, again.

You can't even comprehend what was actually being discussed, gutless.

Nothing to do with what was clearly being discussed, ACCESS TO GOVT HELD
DATA.

 

You're lying thru your teeth, again.

You can't even comprehend what was actually being discussed, gutless.

Nothing to do with what was clearly being discussed, ACCESS TO GOVT HELD
DATA.

 

Bank details? Postal address and the dates and times when you'll be
out, or on holiday?

And if you really think you have nothing to hide, who do you think you
don't need to hide it from? Someone else's malevolent intentions don't
need to make any sense to you. It's not only the thieves you have to
watch (and though they're in the wrong, at least you can understand
why they do what they do). There are plenty of people who like to
create mischief purely for the sake of it.

Of course it does. However securely you keep whatever information you
have in *your* posssession, as soon as any of it is in anybody else's
possession, it's only as secure as *they* can make it. Take something
out of a safe and give it to somebody else who leaves it on the back
seat of a car, and you might as well not have bothered.

Rod.

 

Oh you think the terrorists publish a list do you

get real!


tim

 

And that applies to everyone, does it?

 

They don’t need to, google has the list.

 

It does apply to almost everyone with the NEW
snooping that is being proposed to be allowed.

 

No, dope, I mean that you have nothing to hide so that makes having
this apply to everyone else is OK is it?

 

That's not a number.

 

So it didn't occur to you, thought not.

 

Not a small number, certainly.

 

So you don't know.

That is the problem with all the complaints about "what the guvmint will
do wiv our data", it's all supposition, fantasy and conspiracy theory;
no hard facts.

 

I don't have a way to count them. And to produce a meaningful number
would require a better definition of 'database'.

The NHS reported just over 500 data breaches to the ICO last year, of
which twenty were "serious". Many of the breaches were of significantly
less information than "a whole database", but on the other hand I don't
see much evidence that the breaches included many by outsiders on
fishing expeditions, rather than stuff being published/mis-sent/mislaid
by the data controllers themselves.

 

It didn't occur to me because there is no definitive list,

so it was irrelevant

tim