The Mayor of Tehran has a gorgeous smile

The guy is far from "good looking", but he's got a fabulous smile.

http://tinypic.com/6fa60w.jpg

He's the new Iranian presdient. I personally find him a great subject
for portraiture.

Despite much alarm in the media, this guy hardly looks ominous, at all.
I even doubt he'd tell a lie, as to me he looks like he wears his
feelings wholly in his expressions, and from the pictures they hardly
seem anything but the sincerity of charm, and the charm of sincerity.

http://images.scotsman.com/2005/06/26/2606mahb.jpg
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1050627/images/27iran.jpg

I bet the same intensity of a smile on a more chiseled face would be a
ladies killer.

Look at the first picture again (http://tinypic.com/6fa60w.jpg), and
tell me, if pictures tell much about the personality of the portrait
subject, what does this picture tell you?

I surely hope Bush & Co don't kick some sh*t up over this guy, because
if anything, I'm yet to see a picture of Bush that doesn't fit my
impression of him as an expedient SOB of a liar.

 

He looks very nice, but so did Jeffrey Dahmer........

 

Apart from the above being a tired cliche "He looks very nice, but so
did Jeffrey Dahmer (or other serial killer)........", it is far from
acceptable.

Jeffrey Dahmer looked "very nice" only in the sense of being tall and
blond with the right skeletal features, or in other words; "very nice"
as in "very WASP", as in if you look WASP then you must be a "nice"
guy! We all know there's no way a WASP kid would do such bad things -
that's for the blacks and latinos! That kind of "nice"! Nice as in if
you dress him up right you could imagine him in a business suit driving
his SUV from a corporate meeting to a suburban church!

But if you actually look at Jeffrey Dahmer's pictures his expressions
are very, very ominous. In every picture of him I had seen he always
looked an eminent serial killer. Find me a picture of him with a smile
even half as captivating as that of the Tehran Mayor, who on the other
hand looks almost as homely as a slum dweller, and I'll be more willing
to accept your statement above.

 

He had no trouble charming young ladies into helping him carry groceries and
other items into his car, because of his, "bad back". (He walked
carrying/using a cane) He not only looked harmless, but his personality
projected harmlessness......The only point I was making was that looks are
deceiving, and your mayor of Tehran may not be what he appears to be. My
example of Jeffrey Dahmer was only that.....An example. His race or ethnic
background had nothing to do with my choice of him as an example of looks
not being an accurate indicator of character.

 

After doing some minor research, it seems that I had Jeffrey Dahmer mixed up
with Ted Bundy....It was Bundy that was able to charm the ladies with his
good looks and nice personality.....
Ted Bundy (22+) The Picasso of the serial killing community. Ted was
handsome, charming, intelligent, self-assured, with a brilliant future, and
deadlier than a rattlesnake. Using his good looks, he was able to invisibly
abduct and kill his victims and continue with his seemingly charmed life.
From early 1974 to early 1978, the stranger called "Ted" stalked young women
on college campuses, at shopping malls, in apartment buildings and grade
schools in Washington, Oregon, Utah, Idaho, Colorado and finally Florida.

 

Quote:"In every picture of him I had seen he always
looked an eminent serial killer"
That's because you know he is a serial killer.If you met him on the street
you might be thinking he is an ordinary man.

 

Quote:"Ted Bundy (22+) "
What does that mean?He received 22 counts, or he is 22 years old?That's
right, the good looks of someone can cheat.We have here a singer (in Greece)
who is very handsome, but besides being a draft dodger, sounds totally
stupid when he talks on TV.(He sung last year in Eurovision).And, of course,
all the girls from 11 and above, are crazy with him.

 

Yes, but i'm not talking about "good looks". I specifically said that
Tehran Mayor guy *lacks* "good looks".

 

No no. Regardless. Find me a picture of them, and there are plenty
online - not even just mugshots but from many other occasions, where
either of them look as "nice" a person as that mayor of Tehran guy.
Note, I'm talking about persona, about facial expressions, *not*
physique, *not* facial features.

Here's what I saw in all their pictures, and I'm *not* even talking
about mugshots.

Jeff Dahmer looks like a weird, ill kid who had stopped taking his
medication and is about to flip out at you 'cos he doesn't know whether
you're his dad or the devil.

Ted Bundy looks like a sly, sadistic jerk with a full-time fetish for
forceful anal sex that I wouldn't want near my little sister if I had
one, though I suspect for this very reason that young women - in their
infamously twisted logic - must've found him attractive, as he's got
the look (I really mean manners) of "exactly the kind of guy daddy told
you to avoid!" that chicks fall for.

 

Okay that's more like it.

What would Jeffrey Dalmer need with groceries ? Except perhaps to feed
his food.

--Meanmrmustard

 

Because I was in a hurry to finish some extra work yesterday, I simply cut
and pasted a paragraph about Ted Bundy from something I Googled up, and
didn't elaborate....I believe that number, (22+) refers to the estimated
number of people he killed. The site listed the most prolific serial killers
of recent history together with an estimation of the number of people they
killed....Sorry I mixed up Jeffrey Dahmer with Ted Bundy earlier.....

 

Yes, but i'm not talking about "good looks". I specifically said that
Tehran Mayor guy *lacks* "good looks".

He looks very nice to me, and I have nothing against him.....He may turn out
to be a good mayor. We can only hope. Unfortunately, the new president of
the whole country seems to be taking a hard line for nuclear development,
and will probably be a thorn in the side of the US.

 

Unfortunately, the new president of the whole country seems to be taking a
hard line for nuclear development,

Europe and America need to understand that non-white, non-christian people
will have nuclear power plants too.

 

It isn't the power plants that worry us, and it isn't their color either.
It's the combination of atom bombs and a religion that promises heaven by
killing non-believers that worries us. A few years ago the president of
Syria said, "We are building an atom bomb, and when it is completed, we will
drop it on Israel." There was once a wanna be dictator that wrote a book in
which he said, "When I am in charge, I will rid the earth of Jews." Nobody
paid any attention to him, either.....Their bad.......

 

north korea has admitted to having nuclear bombs, why did everyone forget
about that? because north korea has no value to usa, it has no oil

 

Forget about that? - You must be kidding....Bush hasn't forgotten about
North Korea....He is very worried about them, and has worked hard to get
them to the conference table with S. Korea and China. He named them as part
of the, "Axis of evil". Remember?
But in a sense, you are right about the oil. N. Korea hasn't got the
capitol to sustain a war, and everybody knows it. If you look at a night
satellite photo of N. Korea, you will see virtually no lights. The rest of
the East is lit up like a Christmas tree, and N. Korea is black.
Oil = money, and money = the ability to purchase delivery systems from
France, and other, "good buddies" like France. Our only worry about N. Korea
is that they may sell/give their nuclear weapons to terrorists who think
they can get into heaven by killing thousands of, "infidels" like me. Anyone
with any sense would worry about that.

 

A few years ago the president of Syria said, "We are building an atom
bomb, and when it is completed, we will drop it on Israel."

The Jews have hundreds of nuclear warheads right now, they flaunt
international law with impunity, they illegally occupy and brutally oppress
Palestinians. If I were Syrian or Iranian I'd want my government to build
nukes ASAP, where else are the Jews nukes pointed at? The world will be
safer when more countries have nuclear weapons, if Iraq had nukes do you
seriously think Bush would have launched his illegal war of aggression on it
and killed 100,000+ people to turn the country into a private oil reserve?
North Korea has nukes that's why no one would dare attack it, ever heard of
M.A.D? That's Mutually Assured Destruction, bullies only pick on the weak,
not the similarly armed.

 

All of which may or may not be true, but they haven't dropped any atom bombs
on anyone yet, have they? Nor have we, since the end of WW-II.
There are just some people who can be trusted, and some who can't. It's
when we start trusting the ones who can't that will bring on the real
trouble.....

 

All of which may or may not be true, but they haven't dropped any atom
bombs

So we should just allow them to keep their nukes, and chastise any other
nation that may decide for it's defence to develop their own nuclear
weapons, now I see- must that double-standard new world logic in action.

when we start trusting the ones who can't that will bring on the real
trouble.....

Who exactly decides for the world whom can be trusted, you or the US
Government dangerous liars ?
I mean c'mon, the current US regime is hardly a positive force for world
peace, human rights, freedom of peoples and dignity, or do you really think
Bush means a word of his speech writers rhetoric?

 

I don't see much difference between orthodox jews and Iran's Mullahs.