See for yourself! [URL]http://www.pbase.com/image/32716277/original[/URL]
Nice shot, too bad the D60 took it. It is blurry even after the absurd downsize, the dynamic range is poor, the highlights are blown, and it is only 0.4MP usable. Spiderman is an interesting animal, but you'll never be able to tell that using one of Canon's CMOS chips. Try... http://www.pbase.com/image/17195158/original
I was wondering why everybody here seems to think you are an idiot. Now I finally got my answer... NHF -- ------------------------------ online photo portfolio www.stojcic.com " If you saw a man drowning and you could either save him or photograph the event, what film would you use?" - Anonymous
Apart from his numerous mental and social problems, Preddiot has only got one eye, and it ain't working too well.
I looked at that and at some of the other images in your gallery. I had been thinking I needed a new camera to get better photos. But I see pretty clearly now that what I really need is a brain transplant from you to me. You've got many great photos. Alan
"This is the business end of our friend here. Shortly after this was taken, she rolled over, popped a maggot into her mouth, and gobbled it down." Spiders don't gobble anything down. Obviously, some Sigma users aren't too worried about accuracy; either in their subjects, or their cameras. Bill Funk Change "g" to "a"
From: (Georgette Preddy) Where is it blurry? How much dynamic range do you expect from using a flash at midnight? Uh, no. That would be your mind. Damn, you can't even do the math you friggin moron. It's 0.67 MP as posted. That's a nice closeup (too bad it isn't one of yours). However, once again you compare apples with watermelons. The spider in your example looks to be some sort of tarantula. The spider in my pic was about 1/2" long. Now try getting sharp pics of that sucker when you've got the cammy in one hand, the off-camera flash in the other, and you're standing on a chair on your dimly lit back porch. Go try it. I'll wait.
From: "this old user" Even at f/16 the DOF using the incredible 28-135 IS (@ 135mm) and 68mm of extension tubes is miniscule.
From: "Alan Meyer" Ah, but I didn't have them before I got a great camera! Thanks for the kind words.