SPIDERMAN LOVES THE D60!!

See for yourself!

http://www.pbase.com/image/32716277/original

 

Wow.

David J. Littleboy

Tokyo, Japan

 

Nice shot, too bad the D60 took it. It is blurry even after the
absurd downsize, the dynamic range is poor, the highlights are blown,
and it is only 0.4MP usable. Spiderman is an interesting animal, but
you'll never be able to tell that using one of Canon's CMOS chips.
Try...

http://www.pbase.com/image/17195158/original

 

I was wondering why everybody here seems to think you are an idiot. Now I
finally got my answer... NHF


--
------------------------------
online photo portfolio
www.stojcic.com

" If you saw a man drowning and you could either save him or photograph the
event, what film would you use?"
- Anonymous

 

Apart from his numerous mental and social problems, Preddiot has only got
one eye, and it ain't working too well.

 

I looked at that and at some of the other images
in your gallery.

I had been thinking I needed a new camera to get
better photos. But I see pretty clearly now that what
I really need is a brain transplant from you to me.

You've got many great photos.

Alan

 

Great shot!

but... at f/16, how come only his bulbous backside is in sharp focus?

 

"This is the business end of our friend here. Shortly after this was
taken, she rolled over, popped a maggot into her mouth, and gobbled it
down."
Spiders don't gobble anything down.
Obviously, some Sigma users aren't too worried about accuracy; either
in their subjects, or their cameras.

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

 

From: (Georgette Preddy)

Where is it blurry?

How much dynamic range do you expect from using a flash at midnight?

Uh, no. That would be your mind.

Damn, you can't even do the math you friggin moron. It's 0.67 MP as posted.

That's a nice closeup (too bad it isn't one of yours). However, once again you
compare apples with watermelons.
The spider in your example looks to be some sort of tarantula. The spider in
my pic was about 1/2" long. Now try getting sharp pics of that sucker when
you've got the cammy in one hand, the off-camera flash in the other, and you're
standing on a chair on your dimly lit back porch.

Go try it. I'll wait.

 

From: "this old user"

Even at f/16 the DOF using the incredible 28-135 IS (@ 135mm) and 68mm of
extension tubes is miniscule.

 

From: "Alan Meyer"

Ah, but I didn't have them before I got a great camera!

Thanks for the kind words.

 

Aha! Thanks - I didn't read about the tubes.

 

At that working distance, the depth of field was only a slice of the wee
beastie.

 

Absolutely Outstanding!
Bob Williams