SI Comments - Cooper

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Tony Cooper, Jan 9, 2013.

  1. Tony Cooper

    Peter Guest

    On 1/13/2013 8:56 PM, Peter wrote:
    > On 1/13/2013 8:48 PM, Savageduck wrote:
    >> On 2013-01-13 17:32:10 -0800, Peter <> said:
    >>
    >>> On 1/13/2013 6:09 PM, Savageduck wrote:
    >>>> On 2013-01-13 15:01:44 -0800, Peter <> said:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On 1/12/2013 2:31 PM, Savageduck wrote:
    >>>>>> On 2013-01-12 10:44:59 -0800, Peter <> said:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On 1/11/2013 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
    >>>>>>>> On 2013-01-11 10:18:57 -0800, Peter <> said:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2013 1:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>> On 2013-01-11 09:30:02 -0800, Peter <> said:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2013 10:38 AM, Savageduck wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2013-01-11 07:24:26 -0800, Peter <>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> said:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> << Le Snip >>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> True. I was too focused on other issues, that I didn't think.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> So, betting on the ponies can disrupt your thinking, leading to
    >>>>>>>>>>>> noisy
    >>>>>>>>>>>> photographs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Now you sound like a cop, questioning a suspect! ;-)
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Just the facts ma... ...er, sir.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Has email made the facts obsolete?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> No! The Mayan calendar has.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Then we no longer exist and nothing matters
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> So you too can see into the future?
    >>>>>> I have a similar take on that sort of thing when the clock finally
    >>>>>> winds
    >>>>>> down.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> No! Into the past. It already happened. This group is but a figment of
    >>>>> my imagination, since nothing exists anymore. (if it ever did.)
    >>>>
    >>>> ...however, since the existence of this group is dependent on your
    >>>> imagination, we are able to ascertain that your imagination and its
    >>>> related figments exist.
    >>>> In the future neither of us, and your imagination will exist. As a
    >>>> result the Usenet photogroups will be gone never to reappear in that
    >>>> figment of your imagination.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> Unless I continue it after my reincarnation.

    >>
    >> So, you are a Buddhist-Christian then?
    >>

    >
    > No! A Descatian: (Cogito ergo sum )
    >


    Oops: that should have been "Descartian."

    --
    PeterN
     
    Peter, Jan 14, 2013
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Tony Cooper

    Peter Guest

    On 1/13/2013 9:17 PM, Savageduck wrote:
    > On 2013-01-13 18:01:46 -0800, Peter <> said:
    >


    <snip>


    >>
    >> Oops: that should have been "Descartian."

    >
    > Aah! A thinking, coordinated worshipper of map projections. That make
    > sense.
    >
    >
    >
    > I think of myself as a "Dudist" leaning atheist.
    > < http://dudeism.com/whatisdudeism/ >
    >



    I tried that. But my wife had it confused with Aslongasyur Doism.

    "As long as you have nothing to do, do this, and while yur attit, do that.

    --
    PeterN
     
    Peter, Jan 14, 2013
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Tony Cooper

    Rob Guest

    On 10/01/2013 3:48 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
    > http://www.pbase.com/shootin/street_photography
    >
    > Good to see "Street" shots elevated to the same importance as the
    > letter "M".
    >
    > I really wish people would give a title to their images so that when
    > we discuss an image we can be clear about which image we're
    > discussing. I'll assign titles where there are none.
    >
    > Bowser - "Streetsweeper" lacks anything of interest but the processing
    > it good for what it is. Even in "Street", we want something that is
    > self-identifying as the subject. The "Sunkist Man" has more going for
    > it, but I can't really point at the reason "Why". Maybe it's that the
    > figure is dominant in the image.
    >
    > I'm probably going to take more flak about my cropping preferences,
    > but here goes:
    >
    > Bowser's "Man on the corner" is the most interesting of his three
    > takes, but would work better as a vertical with most of the scene to
    > the right cropped out.
    >
    > That brings up something that, to me, is interesting. For "Street", I
    > prefer the cropped view, but I also see this corner as the setting for
    > another photograph with wide view but without an interesting
    > character. The perspective, the diagonals, and all those angles and
    > textures and shapes are a scene that doesn't need a central character.
    >
    > Rob - "Mak'in a Quid" is a good capture. That bare foot is great.
    > "On ya bike" is an interesting view of recurring shapes, but not what
    > I'd call "Street" even with the bike rider to the top left.
    >
    > I'm often criticized in the "Street" forum I participate in for
    > too-bright colors when I submit in color. Too much vibrancy in
    > processing, I guess. But, when it's a color image then I think you
    > let the colors show.
    >
    > Rob didn't hold back in color in "SVP", and it's one of my favorites
    > in this SI. Good thing Rob didn't pay attention to the "No
    > photography" symbol on the easel. If there's one thing I'd like to
    > see that isn't there it's a little more of the pipe. It explains the
    > smoke.
    >


    these were all taken in Montreal on the same day.

    SVP although I don't speak French didn't want to intrude too much into
    his space. - and I was sure he wasn't going to turn around and smile.

    The bikes fascinated me and the way they hire. Bulk bikes everywhere.

    Mak'in a quid thought he was doing it hard, basic tools etc.




    > SavageDuck - "Cowboy Hat Man" is just kinda flat. The Duck should've
    > waited until the "Man on a Bench" turned a bit to the camera.


    I would have liked more of a story with this much room around the man.



    A
    > profile could've worked. The "Juggler" is a good catch, but I'd bring
    > out the yellow of the object in the air. The image needs one of the
    > three objects up in the air, and the one that is kinda gets lost in
    > the background.
    >


    I thought the background was too busy and more emphases should have gone
    into the juggler.





    > DanP - When people hear that I like to do "Street", they think that
    > all I shoot are bums and down-and-outers. People think that "Street"
    > means black and white, gritty shots of the seamy side. Not so.
    >

    I tend to see lots of this sort of stuff becomes a bit repetitive after
    a while.

    > "Street" is what we see on the street. This is what Dan saw, and it
    > works well for "Street".
    >


    I look more at vibrancy in street scenes instead of doom and gloom

    > Bob Coe - Here we go again on cropping. That blown-out white
    > tablecloth should be have been cropped out. Well, as much as
    > possible. Blown-out is bad, and a dominate light area in an otherwise
    > darkish scene distracts. Otherwise, the scene is very good.
    >
    > I see what Bob was going for in the "Construction Zone", but it just
    > doesn't come off. The "Night Shot" does. Some strong areas, but it
    > results in good balance.
    >
    > Peter Newman - "Almost Off" is very much South Beach, but not much
    > "Street". I like "Pick a Winner", but I'm not keen on that much
    > grain. Good composition and subject choice. Ditto for all comments
    > when looking at "The Loser".
    >
    > Regarding the comment about my "Atelier", I think the image would work
    > with or without the door on the right. Cropping it out wouldn't make
    > it a better composition, and leaving it in doesn't make it better.
    > "Musical Rest" would look better without that construction fence over
    > the umbrella, but it's there. "Tired" is a non-standard ratio crop
    > that I like. I wish I would have toned down that white sign on the
    > pole with a little burning.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
     
    Rob, Jan 22, 2013
    #23
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
  1. tony cooper

    SI "M" Comments

    tony cooper, Mar 5, 2011, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    16
    Views:
    645
    John Turco
    Mar 31, 2011
  2. tony cooper

    SI - Work - Comments

    tony cooper, Mar 24, 2012, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    15
    Views:
    1,409
    PeterN
    Mar 30, 2012
  3. tony cooper

    [SI] Food - Comments

    tony cooper, Jun 13, 2012, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    673
    PeterN
    Jun 17, 2012
  4. Robert Coe

    [SI] Food comments - Bob Coe

    Robert Coe, Jun 13, 2012, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    696
    PeterN
    Jun 17, 2012
  5. Tony Cooper

    Steeples - Cooper's Comments

    Tony Cooper, Feb 13, 2013, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    486
    John Turco
    Feb 15, 2013
  6. Tony Cooper

    Cooper's Comments - NTX

    Tony Cooper, Apr 28, 2013, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    471
    PeterN
    Apr 30, 2013
  7. Tony Cooper

    Furniture - Cooper's comments

    Tony Cooper, Jun 10, 2013, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    465
  8. Tony Cooper

    [SI] Tem - Cooper comments

    Tony Cooper, Aug 27, 2013, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    379
    PeterN
    Aug 29, 2013
Loading...