Samba beats Windows 2003 in file serving performance

Discussion in 'Computer Support' started by Dolly, Nov 5, 2003.

  1. Dolly

    Dolly Guest

    Dolly, Nov 5, 2003
    #1

    1. Advertisements

  2. Dolly

    Boomer Guest

    Boomer, Nov 5, 2003
    #2

    1. Advertisements

  3. Dolly

    hugh jass Guest

    Always nice to respond to a post with a question of your own.
    Keeps 'em guessing!

    --
    ______________________
    please remove the obvious from my email...
    : :
    : > Article by ITWeek shows Samba beats Win2003 file serving by 2.5
    : > times! How is this possible? Shouldn't file serving native in
    : > Windows be faster?
    : >
    : > http://go.jitbot.com/samba3-beats-win2k3
    : >
    : > -- Dolly
    :
    : Hi
    :
    : I don't have a clue about server clients/software.
    :
    : My question (on a lower level) because IE is native to Windows (MS)
    : should it be faster than any other browser?
    :
    : Nice graph btw. :)
    : http://www.itweek.co.uk/ITWeek/itw_graph_1144289.jsp
    :
     
    hugh jass, Nov 5, 2003
    #3

    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. Samba 3 extends lead over Win 2003....newbie or wannabe mcse's - get a clue!

  2. Samba 3 runs rings around Windows Server 2003 in file serving performance

  3. ftp serving

  4. A SELF-SERVING RESPONSE

  5. Performance: Windows 2003 64 bits Terminal Services + Office 2003

  6. Serving web pages

  7. Windows 7, Media Player - Settings for Media Serving NOT being savedfor Home Group

  8. Windows XP x64 and Samba access

Loading...