Photo of Bush's mystery bulge between shoulder blades

For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html

That salon.com isn't exactly main-stream media, but if you want
confirmation, go to

http://tinyurl.com/5cwuj

 

If he's smart, it's an UZI.

Bill Crocker


"Archibald" <> wrote in message
news:...
> For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see
>
> http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
>
> That salon.com isn't exactly main-stream media, but if you want
> confirmation, go to
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5cwuj

 

But....its such a tiny little bulge...could it be a tiny little Uzi? Does
that give credence to the firearm=penis contention?

 

Gene Palmiter wrote:

> But....its such a tiny little bulge...could it
> be a tiny little Uzi? Does that give credence
> to the firearm=penis contention?

If he can sling his schwanz up between his
shoulder blades, I'd even vote for him,
and I'm a Chicago Democrat.

(I'll draw the line at voting for him twice
or after I'm dead. I do have some principles,
even if he is hung like a Tennessee Walker.)

 

Archibald wrote:
> For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see
>
> http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html

Heinlein. The Puppet Masters.

....which, come to think of it, would explain quite a lot...


Rob.
--

 

"Rob Davison" <> wrote in message
news:cCEad.12441$...
> Archibald wrote:
> > For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see
> >
> > http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
>
> Heinlein. The Puppet Masters.
>
> ...which, come to think of it, would explain quite a lot...
>
>
> Rob.

Don't even suggest it! We don't want to see that bunch running around naked!

 

Oops...not photo related.....We don't want to see "digital photos" of that
bunch naked!

 

It's probably some strapping on his bullet-proof vest.


Archibald wrote:

>For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see
>
>http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
>
>That salon.com isn't exactly main-stream media, but if you want
>confirmation, go to
>
>http://tinyurl.com/5cwuj
>
>

 

Archibald wrote:
> For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see
>
> http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
>
> That salon.com isn't exactly main-stream media, but if you want
> confirmation, go to
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5cwuj


Just a puppet on a string... http://www.lewrockwell.com/reese/reese74.html

 

In article <>, Antonio L. Balsamo Sr.
<> wrote:

> It's probably some strapping on his bullet-proof vest.

It's his spine. The liberals aren't used to people who have them.

 

If it was a receiver, combined with an earpiece, it didn't work. He was
absolutely horrible. No grasp of the facts, totally unable to think on his
feet, and unable to construct a single sentence, much less a paragraph.
Total moron.

"Archibald" <> wrote in message
news:...
> For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see
>
> http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
>
> That salon.com isn't exactly main-stream media, but if you want
> confirmation, go to
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5cwuj

 

Easy explanation.....the bulge is where the batteries go, the door was
loose, and Ol' W's reception was intermittant. Poor guy...no wonder he
had problems.

Böwsér wrote:
> If it was a receiver, combined with an earpiece, it didn't work. He was
> absolutely horrible. No grasp of the facts, totally unable to think on his
> feet, and unable to construct a single sentence, much less a paragraph.
> Total moron.
>
> "Archibald" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>
>>For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see
>>
>>http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
>>
>>That salon.com isn't exactly main-stream media, but if you want
>>confirmation, go to
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/5cwuj
>
>
>

 

I saw that photo on Sunday and couldn't believe the controversy over it.
After looking at the photo I looked at others, that day, wearing sport coats or
suit jackets. Virtually all of them had some sort of bulge between their
shoulder blades or in the middle of their back. Grant it some didn't look as
large and pronounced as this one but remember with studio lighting as harsh as
it is, mounted from the ceiling and designed not only to provide proper shadows
but highlights in order to provide some depth to an image, small things like a
wrinkle in a coat CAN appear more pronounced.

I happen to know some of this from experience with Video and Television
Production. What amazes me is that there are people in Television who think
there is something to this. Especially news anchors and reporters. They
should be some of the first ones to know that this is crap.

Ask any news anchor or reporter why they pull the back of their jacket down and
sit on the tail of it when sitting at the set. You will likely find your
answer to this mystery.

 

On 12 Oct 2004 15:32:16 GMT, (WMAS 1960) wrote:

>I saw that photo on Sunday and couldn't believe the controversy over it.
>After looking at the photo I looked at others, that day, wearing sport coats or
>suit jackets. Virtually all of them had some sort of bulge between their
>shoulder blades or in the middle of their back. Grant it some didn't look as
>large and pronounced as this one but remember with studio lighting as harsh as
>it is, mounted from the ceiling and designed not only to provide proper shadows
>but highlights in order to provide some depth to an image, small things like a
>wrinkle in a coat CAN appear more pronounced.
>
>I happen to know some of this from experience with Video and Television
>Production. What amazes me is that there are people in Television who think
>there is something to this. Especially news anchors and reporters. They
>should be some of the first ones to know that this is crap.

On the contrary, the folks in the media apparently knew that George
had been wiring up routinely for years. So for them, it was no news.

http://www.nbc4.com/news/3799123/detail.html (audible prompting)
http://www.suntimes.com/output/roeper/cst-nws-roep12.html (D-day)

 

"Randall Ainsworth" <> wrote in message
news:121020040609221777%...
> In article <>, Antonio L. Balsamo Sr.
> <> wrote:
>
>> It's probably some strapping on his bullet-proof vest.
>
> It's his spine. The liberals aren't used to people who have them.

Actually, we're used to people with real spines, not the phony type Dumbya
is sporting.

 

Regarding the sources you posted,

First, I don't see a wire going to his ear DURING THE DEBATE, as they suggest.
If there is than that would be different and more conclusive than making
something out of a bulge or wrinkle in the fabric of his jacket.

Second, the article doesn't say that they KNOW of other incidents of him being
wired. At least from the NBC4 article that you posted. They say that A
WEBSITE devoted to this issue (could that be the conspiricy theory site?)
SUGGESTS that he has been wired in the past. Do the bloggers know that he
wired himself during DEBATES? or do they say he was wired during SPEECHES and
INTERVIEWS. They are not reporting independantly known fact but just quotes or
assertions of sorts from another source.

Then, several people have written in saying that they have heard prompting.
Who are these people writing in. What is their credibility... Are they
reliable media people who are in the know? or scanner enthusiasts who might be
listening on their Bearcats.... Conspiricy Theorists Or, maybe political
operatives trying to feed a story. One thing in that section of the article
that I can't believe, If Bush and his people have been covertly engaged in
such activities than why would it be part of a "NEWS FEED" These would be
private conversations outside of the debate or production and NOT part of the
"NEWS FEED". Otherwise, everyone would know this for fact and there would be
no denial and question.

Technologically what is being suggested is no different than the little
earpiece that news anchors and guests have during interviews. In TV studios
these are often hard wired through an intercom system. It can be done wireless
though and usually is in the field during remote segments. I often listen to
them on scanners from femote truck feeds to and from the control rooms during
the evening or 10:00 news. With these earpieces producers and directors feed
information to reporters and guests regarding upcoming questions, cues....
Producers will sometimes prompt anchors and reporters with facts to expand
interviews or add information or to give them cues to going live, to upcoming
breaks or to direct them to engage another guest... or cut to another camera or
piece of recorded tape etc. It could be possible that a candidate, while
being INTERVIEWED would do the same things with show producers or maybe their
advisors. But, are people alleging that they heard this prompting DURING
DEBATES? or has the propting occoured during speeches and interviews. It
could make a difference. One is a legitimate cue, similar maybe to a
teleprompter or note cards. The other of course would be cheating if the other
participant(s) don't have the same resources.

As for Ropers article in the Sun Times, I think if you read it again you will
see that it touches on part of what I was saying.

First, he starts, not by reporting facts but quoting the comments of one person
who wrote on the subject, In a blog(?). Second the allegation of "NEWS FEED"
was a SPEECH at a D-Day Observance. Not alleged to be during a debate. Like
I said, it sounds like someone might have been feeding him a speech or speech
notes. That would be different than feeding answers to questions in a DEBATE.


In my background is a degree in Communications that included a lot of public
speaking. There are many ways that one might organize their thoughts for a
SPEECH. You never want to go in front of people without your thoughts
organized. Especially if you are the President of The United States and you
know that your every word will be dissected and manipulated..... You might
commit your speech to memory, which would be dangerous for someone like a
president giving an important address or speech. You could also make up note
cards of your main points if all you want to do is keep in an organized
direction or to make sure you don't forget a point you want to make. A
combination of the first two methods migth help so you can commit your speech
to memory and use note cards to cue you to segments of the speech. Sometimes
it is easier to remember a long speech by segmenting it into smaller portions.
You use note cards to prompt you on those segments in a proper order. Or,
you will actually TRANSCRIBE your speech, letter for letter, word for word.
That is what a president would do. Then you have a record of EXACTLY what you
said. You will have the speech in front of you on written pages and page
through them as you read them. Or, to help with eye contact you would have the
speech projected on a teleprompter (those tinted glass panels in front of the
podium) so you can look at the audience and have your speech in front of you.
Then, in some speaking environement, where a teleprompter might not be
practical, say do to lighting washing out those little pieces of glass or the
TV screens, or wind blowing and interfering with a written transcript or maybe
you just don't want to be fumbling with your papers during a speech, it might
be legitimate to have someone reading your speech to you through an earpeace.
If that is the issue, I would think it would take some practice and pretty good
coordination to be able to speak words that have just been read to you. It
could be that it is easier if done more as notes or points... rather than a
verbatim reading of the speech.

 

Randall Ainsworth <> wrote:

>In article <>, Antonio L. Balsamo Sr.
><> wrote:
>
>> It's probably some strapping on his bullet-proof vest.
>
>It's his spine. The liberals aren't used to people who have them.

Not suprising Kerry managed to get his back up. Bush certainly
got the hump.

--
Ken Tough

 

Randall Ainsworth wrote:
>
> In article <>, Antonio L. Balsamo Sr.
> <> wrote:
>
> > It's probably some strapping on his bullet-proof vest.
>
> It's his spine. The liberals aren't used to people who have them.


Hello

More like the spine of someone with a deformity.
Spines are usually done the back, not a lump at the top and slightly to
one side. Anyway it won't make any difference, he will still ne elected.


Mike Engles

 

Archibald <> writes:

> On the contrary, the folks in the media apparently knew that George
> had been wiring up routinely for years. So for them, it was no news.

And he was well wired while in the ANG as well.

> http://www.nbc4.com/news/3799123/detail.html (audible prompting)
> http://www.suntimes.com/output/roeper/cst-nws-roep12.html (D-day)

--
Paul Repacholi 1 Crescent Rd.,
+61 (08) 9257-1001 Kalamunda.
West Australia 6076
comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot
Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.
EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.

 

"Archibald" <> wrote in message
news:...
> For a digital photo of the mystery bulge, see
>
> http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
>
> That salon.com isn't exactly main-stream media, but if you want
> confirmation, go to
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5cwuj

Yep, And anyone who has ever wore Second Chance body armor should
recognize that bulge, It is the rear web splice
over the shoulder blade panels.

--
Steve