Oil Rig - By Night

As promised, two photo's of the largest oil rig in the world
I photographed earlier, but this time 'by night'.

http://tinyurl.com/h38v
http://tinyurl.com/h38x

Or go to my Gallery and click 'Objecten'
http://www.rharte.nl/images/fotoindex_main.html

Comments are welcome!

Rene

 

http://www.rharte.nl/images/fotoindex_main.html

VERY pretty and impressive.
Thanks for posting them.

 

Great pics. My only gripe is the fringing around the lights but this is
a very difficult situation for any digital camera, and most would
display the same thing. Nice shots!

--
________________________________
Todd Walker
http://twalker.d2g.com
Olympus E20
Canon G2
My Digital Photography Weblog:
http://twalker.d2g.com/dpblog.htm
_________________________________

 

The second one is breath taking!

 

Both are really impressive photos, I particularly like the second one.
If global oil companies sold post cards, that would be one of them.

Thanks for sharing,

David, Co-Founder
http://www.shutterline.com

 

That's an idea.
It =is= the biggest rig in the world. He should send them a small photo
and see if they're interested in a larger one for publicity, cover of
company magazine or such.

 

1. Stop this crossposting.

2. The automatic shrinking of the picture let it
looks like s**t.

 

Please tell me why? Do you call the shots here?

Well, my friend: your own browser is to blame for that, not me.
You can also save the picture on your HD, and view it in
any way you like.
Furthermore, you seem to be in disagreement with everybody else
in this thread regarding the quality of the pic. So if you don't have
any constructive criticism, or a funded opinion, there's not
much I can do with this reaction.....

Grtx,

Rene

 

So what's the big deal on the crossposting? The pictures are just fine.
They are rather well-done in a technical sense and the subject matter is
interesting. But your browser operation evidently isn't up to snuff.

 

I would say that Leo Stern isn't up to snuff
probably Howard Stern's illegitimate son.

 

Although I agree about xposting and the mention of the german speaking
group obviously adds another slant the "The automatic shrinking of the
picture let it looks like s**t." part of the post was an obvious flame.

 

You are also crossposting you stupid asshole...

Sounds like a personal problem to me so SIT on it and ROTATE!!!


______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

 

He's not in disagreement with -everybody-. I aslo pointed out in an
email to you along with some suggestions ...

"Forcing the browser to resize (Height=90%) guarantees that your image
will look a lesser quality than if you size it to the exact size you
want displayed."

 

"Forcing the browser to resize (Height=90%) guarantees that your image

But if you do it the other way around, you get a lot of comments
from people with 800x600 screens... I think it is impossible to make
a website which makes all people (all browsers, all monitor resolutions)
happy. At least you can save the pic to disk, and do whatever with it....

Rene

 

IF you've the space, put up a good image for 800x600 format and a
"SUPERSIZE" link beneath. You won't depend upon the crappy browser to
resize 'on the fly' and produce jaggies. Only those wanting the BIG
view will wait for the full sized, others will be spared a longer DL
wait as well!

The worst problem comes with the <Height=90%> when the viewer is using
a browser window -larger- than yours and thus the image becomes
magnified! Boy is that pure junk!.

FWIW, a little manipulation of the under platform areas in your second
night shot brings out some interesting details and extra colours on
the supports.