Oh my! Where oh where did all the lying slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLS go to?

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

He's in a slump. Got nothin' bad to say and is feelin' real perplexed.
btw, a real photograph isn't necessarily a museum showpiece. Sometimes a
mere record photo will do. But y'know, a famous world renowned traveler
like our favorite p&s troll would never stand for such a meager critique.
Have a good one!

 

Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own? If so, please describe any one of
them that you said I had stolen. I would love nothing better than to hear
all about it again. I'll repost the downsized "stolen" version for you
again just to make sure that it is one of the many that any of you lying
slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLs claimed I had stole.

LOL!!!!

 

Uh, excuse me, but I never claimed you stole anything. Did you?

I just take photos as I see fit with the camera I like. No more, no less.
I sometimes make money at it; sometimes I don't.

I don't claim to be some extra whatever that knows it all.

 

I don't remember any links to any images that I would want to claim to
be a DSLR-taken image. Mud is mud, whether taken with a DSLR or a
P&S.

If you are an image thief, you've got to be the dumbest one I've ever
come across. Nothing you've linked to and claimed as your own work
was worth stealing. Or posting. Or keeping.

 

I think he posted a link to a photgraph of a moth. I think it was a
moth. It was a dark, blurry thing that may have had wings. He said
it was a rare moth. He photographs a lot of rare things that are not
in any of the guide books. Of course, it may be that the guide books
just don't use dark, out-of-focus, blurry shots.