Night shots are better with digital camera- No film vs camera debate

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by zxcvar, Sep 1, 2003.

  1. zxcvar

    zxcvar Guest

    Greetings! I am reading an article in a magazine called Digital Photo
    Pro. In page 76, one of the photographers of Sports Illustrated said
    that the photographs are just better from the digital camera
    particularly the night shots. There is no comparison to the film. Can
    one explain this to me? Incidentally this photographer uses Canon
    A secondary question - Would I cause copy right violations if I gave
    the photographers name and quoted his exact remarks with quotation
    marks? With thanks.
    zxcvar, Sep 1, 2003
    1. Advertisements

  2. zxcvar

    Ruth Guest

    I would think not, as long as you quote him as the person who gave the
    remarks and where you found it... It's called referencing. It's done in
    books all the time :)
    Ruth, Sep 1, 2003
    1. Advertisements

  3. zxcvar

    Howard Guest

    Howard, Sep 1, 2003
  4. zxcvar

    JK Guest

    The sample photos I have seen from the 10D at 800 ISO looked very nice.
    Even the 1600 ISO images looked pretty decent. Images on ISO 800
    film, and especially ISO 1600 film are not so nice looking.
    Probably not, if you only quoted a small part of the article you read
    it in, and provided a link to that article. That is my opinion.
    JK, Sep 1, 2003
  5. zxcvar

    gr Guest

    Garbage. Try taking a several-hour exposure of the night sky from a very
    dark location, then tell me that digital is better than film.
    gr, Sep 1, 2003
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.