New Updates for Spyware Blaster Available

Discussion in 'Computer Support' started by Julie P., Jun 25, 2004.

  1. Julie P.

    Nemesis Guest

    Not this time. Keyboard sticky?
     
    Nemesis, Jun 26, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. Julie P.

    Nemesis Guest

    Hmmm.
     
    Nemesis, Jun 26, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. Julie P.

    Nemesis Guest

    Don't mention it.
     
    Nemesis, Jun 26, 2004
  4. Julie P.

    Nemesis Guest

    Curious?
     
    Nemesis, Jun 26, 2004
  5. Julie P.

    Nemesis Guest

    Like to borrow a hose?
     
    Nemesis, Jun 26, 2004
  6. Julie P.

    Nemesis Guest

    Curious observation. Are you saying, as a general proposition, that any
    failure by a person ipso facto deprives them of the capacity to decide what
    is normal? That would be patently stupid. But that is no surprise to
    you, is it?
     
    Nemesis, Jun 26, 2004
  7. Julie P.

    Nemesis Guest

    Methylheptyl-Thiodiethanol-Hexachlorobicyclo-3-Hydroxy-1-Carbodithioate
    wrote:
    Any untoward pressure applied to get that admission?
     
    Nemesis, Jun 26, 2004
  8. There are at least 11. You neglected to mention those who pretend they know
    and never get caught out.
     
    Baho Utot, the half-bred, delighting fuckster, Jun 26, 2004
  9. You seem to have expressed unwarranted surprise, chuckleboy.
    I'll cut you off again at your first error.
    OOPS, eh.
     
    T. Max Devlin, the rank, maturing gnawer, Jun 26, 2004
  10. Nemesis, after spending 3 minutes figuring out which end of the pen to use,
    wrote:

    <snip some kind of stalker lingo>

    Damn! You've *another* stalker K-Man. How many does that make now?
     
    Norwegian Formula, Jun 26, 2004
  11. Julie P.

    Nemesis Guest

    Suggest you read the thread and you will see how it unfolded. Then you
    might have the grace to withdraw that false claim.
     
    Nemesis, Jun 26, 2004
  12. John Bokma wrote:

    [snip unread]
    Damn. You had me beaten to a pulp until you wrote that. Now I know for sure
    that you're just telling porkies.
     
    John Bokma, the dye maker, Jun 26, 2004
  13. Julie P.

    John Bokma Guest

    pearls for the swines
     
    John Bokma, Jun 26, 2004
  14. Nemesis wrote:

    Please feel free to insert random snips in this reply. Also feel free to
    ignore any of the more salient points. It doesn't even matter if you don't
    read a single word of it. Others probably will.
    A) You forgot to check the followup headers, you incompetent oaf.

    B) Your deliberate avoidance of personal pronouns to indicate and draw
    attention to yourself is noted.
    I have a much better idea. How about _you_ go back through the messages and,
    using copy/paste, compile a sound argument as to why he should retract and
    why his claim is wrong? You do know how to construct an argument, don't you?
    Maybe you are more familiar with bleating self-justifications.

    Anyway, if you ever get around to 'developing an argument', you will also
    need to deal with this little gem... Focus your beady, close-set eye on your
    own question:
    Don't know what's so telling about that question? Can't see the forest for
    the trees? You wouldn't be waiting for me to tell you, would you?
    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
     
    Nemesis, the foggy, joying weevil, Jun 26, 2004
  15. Oh. Please feel free to infer total devastation on my part, brought about by
    your cutting, incisive wit.

    Of course, it won't matter to your delusional mind that the truth is my
    nitrous oxide cylinder is empty and I just can't be arsed wasting a belly
    laugh on your inept mangling of even the most rudimentary of clichés.
     
    John Bokma, the pit winch operator, Jun 26, 2004
  16. Julie P.

    John Bokma Guest

    Don't make jokes about it. It took a great effort to go down to your
    level. I am afraid I can not manage to wander there much longer, so
    don't be amazed when I no longer reply.
     
    John Bokma, Jun 26, 2004
  17. Don't make jokes about what? Your delusional mind or your hilarious mangling
    of simple clichés?

    Anyway, I do as I please. You can only stew in your phthisis of the
    intellect.
    Eh? Copying and pasting a reference from dictionary.com took great effort on
    your part?
    Maybe you should have a nap, you poor dear.
    I won't infer an "I won't reply anymore therefore I win" lame. Instead I
    will merely assume that you're having that extended nap you need, you poor
    dear.
     
    John Bokma, the knavish, disculpating motherfucker, Jun 26, 2004
  18. Incorrect perception. You were actually suspended upside-down and
    simply had the impression of moving downwards when, in actual fact,
    your rear end was making its way top-side.
     
    John Blockhead, Jun 26, 2004
  19. It may have been far more advantageous to you to have ignored Bokma's post
    entirely. Given all the bleating and mooing like a calf that's lost it's
    mother you've been doing lately, some people might be inclined to infer that
    you're trying to suck on a tit that isn't there. Know what I mean?
     
    John Blockhead, the surfeited, extemporising puffb, Jun 26, 2004
  20. You have me confused with someone who actually gives a damn what
    Useneters may or may not think. I have no identity. It was, however, fun
    seeing them scour around like confused rats under the belief that you were
    recruiting.
     
    John Blockhead, Jun 26, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.