New anti-blaster worm attempts to fix RPC/DCOM vuln - W32/Nachi.worm

Discussion in 'Computer Security' started by Lord Shaolin, Aug 19, 2003.

  1. Lord Shaolin

    Lord Shaolin Guest

    Info from:

    UPDATED: New variants of the MS Blast worm have been detected in the wild.
    A new worm has also been discovered that exploits the MSRPC DCOM
    vulnerability that is not related to the MS Blast variants. This new worm
    has been labeled "Nachi", and also labeled incorrectly as a LovSan.D. The
    Nachi worm has improved scanning logic, feature improvements, and auto-
    patching functionality. It also propagates by an additional exploit vector,
    exploiting the WebDAV vulnerability in Microsoft's IIS 5 Web Server.

    UPDATED: The Nachi worm will infect vulnerable Windows XP machines using
    the same exploit used by the MS Blast worm family. The main difference
    between Nachi and MS Blast, is that Nachi will remove and disable MS Blast
    infections that it encounters, and download and install the correct MSRPC
    DCOM patch from Microsoft. This action will permanently close the MSRPC
    DCOM vulnerability. The Nachi worm will not patch the WebDAV vulnerability
    on Windows 2000 Servers.

    UPDATED: Nachi Worm
    The Nachi worm is technically superior to its predecessors. Its scanning
    logic is more robust, it has the ability to propagate more quickly and it
    will clean computers infected with MS Blast. It contains an additional
    vector which exploits Microsoft IIS 5.0 via WebDAV. The Nachi worm seems to
    been designed for benevolent purposes only. There is no viral or DDoS
    payload. Expanded technical details are included below:

    From ISS -

    Full info from Symantec:

    Removal tool:

    Original Blaster info:



    -+ Shaolin +-
    Discard what is useless, absorb what is not and
    add what is uniquely your own.

    .: :.
    Lord Shaolin, Aug 19, 2003
    1. Advertisements

  2. Lord Shaolin

    donut Guest

    What is to prevent that from changing, once the creator(s) have discovered
    how effective it is?

    As with any worm, scour, disallow, disinfect, and protect (first and
    donut, Aug 19, 2003
    1. Advertisements

  3. Wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft had released this worm in an effort to
    protect their own arse (ie. the windowsupdate site)..

    R Green
    Technical Support
    R Green, Aug 19, 2003
  4. Lord Shaolin

    J. Reilink Guest

    Yeah, right... If you've read the article(s) you'd know that the worm does a
    little more than patching the RPC DCOM hole. Among other things, it exploits
    a vulnerability in NTDLL.DLL (MS03-007) and overwrites some files (such as
    J. Reilink, Aug 20, 2003
  5. Gee, wouldn't it be a great move for someone to write a DESTRUCTIVE virus
    and name it "FixBlast" or "FixBlaster" so that people would PURPOSELY
    download it!!!
    Hü©klëßë®®ÿ, Aug 20, 2003
  6. Lord Shaolin

    John Tate Guest

    It could well have been the same person who did blaster, so what if it
    isnt viral or ddosing, maybe he just wanted to flood the internet with
    crap. making it the third worm this year to do it, and all 3 being
    Microsoft Products.

    And they say they know security.
    John Tate, Aug 20, 2003
  7. Lord Shaolin

    John Tate Guest

    Really, I should try reading, this enforces my thought that it might just
    be the same guy who did blaster.
    John Tate, Aug 20, 2003
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.