NAT versus NO NAT

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by interflex, Jul 27, 2006.

  1. interflex

    interflex Guest

    We currently have several web servers behind a firewall in the DMZ (DMZ
    port of the firewall). Each server has a public facing IP address. We
    will be switching firewalls and I would like to get opinions if we
    should implement NAT for the web servers or stay with the current
    configuration?

    Thanks for responding.
     
    interflex, Jul 27, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Depends upon what application is running in your servers, i.e. some
    protocols can not cope with NAT.
    I recommend running public IP in the DMZ, to avoid such implication, now
    aswell in the future.

    No problem.
    Regards
    Martin
     
    Martin Bilgrav, Jul 27, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.