On Thursday, June 5, 2014 1:44:17 AM UTC-4, David Taylor wrote: > On 05/06/2014 00:10, RichA wrote: > >  > > > Number five could have been a Heinz ad, if the bottle had been turned around. > > > > I find the backgrounds extremely unattractive. How are they supposed to > > differ from a regular wide-aperture lens? Does anyone really consider > > them an improvement? I find the backgrounds animated but not objectionable. They do seem to improve a bit on the 3rd dimensional look of the image.