MCSE, MCP+I in NT 4.0 still accredited?

I got my MCSE and MCP + Internet in Windows NT 4.0 back in 1999.

Am I still allowed to use the MCSE and MCP+ Internet on my business
cards and letterheads?



Filthy Rich
Music House

 

Depends on what your electives were. The IIS3 exam is no longer credited, so
if you did IIS4 then you shoudl still be OK.

"Filthy Rich" <> wrote in message
news:...
> I got my MCSE and MCP + Internet in Windows NT 4.0 back in 1999.
>
> Am I still allowed to use the MCSE and MCP+ Internet on my business
> cards and letterheads?
>
>
>
> Filthy Rich
> Music House

 

Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
dont carry over.

good luck to you..

>-----Original Message-----
>I got my MCSE and MCP + Internet in Windows NT 4.0 back
in 1999.
>
>Am I still allowed to use the MCSE and MCP+ Internet on
my business
>cards and letterheads?
>
>
>
>Filthy Rich
>Music House
>.
>

 

Possibly incorrect Ron.

It depends entirely on what exams he did for the NT4 MCSE.

From: http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcp/mcse/faq.asp

Q. I was an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0. One of my elective exams, Exam 70-077:
Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Internet Information Server 3.0 and
Microsoft Index Server 1.1, was discontinued on June 30, 2000, and I did not
pass a current replacement exam before the June 30, 2001, deadline. Am I
still certified as an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0?

A. You are no longer certified as an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0. To be
certified as an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0, you must have met both the core and
elective requirements for NT 4.0. Exam 70-077 was discontinued in June 2000
as part of the Windows NT 3.51 exam discontinuations. If you did not meet
the upgrade requirements for Exam 70-077 by June 30, 2001, then you are no
longer certified on Windows NT 4.0. See Discontinuation of Exams for more
information.


Q. In the case above, if I now pass a current MCSE elective exam to replace
discontinued Exam 70-077, will I be certified again?

A. Yes, if you pass a current MCSE elective now, you will again be
certified as an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0. Please see the MCSE on Windows NT
4.0 requirements page for details on electives that are currently available.



"Ron Williams" <> wrote in message
news:044d01c3611f$30121e00$...
> Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
> generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
> take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
> dont carry over.
>
> good luck to you..
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >I got my MCSE and MCP + Internet in Windows NT 4.0 back
> in 1999.
> >
> >Am I still allowed to use the MCSE and MCP+ Internet on
> my business
> >cards and letterheads?
> >
> >
> >
> >Filthy Rich
> >Music House
> >.
> >

 

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:15:07 -0700, "Ron Williams"
<> wrote:

>Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
>generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
>take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
>dont carry over.
>
>good luck to you..

Another thing... can you stop with the ass-backwards posting? Do you
answer people in person before they ask you a question?


A: Top posters
Q: What's one of the most annoying things on usenet?

 

i resent that ;-)

"|{evin" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:15:07 -0700, "Ron Williams"
> <> wrote:
>
> >Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
> >generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
> >take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
> >dont carry over.
> >
> >good luck to you..
>
> Another thing... can you stop with the ass-backwards posting? Do you
> answer people in person before they ask you a question?
>
>
> A: Top posters
> Q: What's one of the most annoying things on usenet?
>

 

Who the f*ck do you think that you are to dictate how
anyone post in this newsgroup. If you don't like the way
they're posted, skip em. Perhaps you're ass backwards!
Some of the crap complained about in here borders on
ridiculous. If that's the only thing you have to worry
about you're living a divine life. You bottom posting...
oh nevermind.

>-----Original Message-----
>On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:15:07 -0700, "Ron Williams"
><> wrote:
>
>>Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
>>generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
>>take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
>>dont carry over.
>>
>>good luck to you..
>
>Another thing... can you stop with the ass-backwards
posting? Do you
>answer people in person before they ask you a question?
>
>
>A: Top posters
>Q: What's one of the most annoying things on usenet?
>
>.
>

 

"Maestro" <> wrote in message
news:09bd01c361b2$28b21be0$...
> Who the f*ck do you think that you are to dictate how
> anyone post in this newsgroup.

He was not dictating, he was asking.

> If you don't like the way
> they're posted, skip em.

That would be fine if there was some way to know before opening the post
that it was top-posted. I don't see to many subject lines with [Warning:
Top poster] included.

> Perhaps you're ass backwards!

Do you read from bottom to top? Do you also read from right to left?
Shalom!

> Some of the crap complained about in here borders on
> ridiculous. If that's the only thing you have to worry
> about you're living a divine life. You bottom posting...
> oh nevermind.

We'll cross that border someday. Stay tuned.


--
Fris "Please, Mr. Postman" bee® MCNGP #13

http://www.mcngp.tk
The MCNGP Team - We're here to help

 

Your inline posting is difficult to read. Please refrain from doing so in
the future. Or if possible create a diagram so that I may better follow
your discussion.

Thank you.

 

> k

Your ready complience offends me. Please refrain from being so easy going
in the future.


Thank you.

 

top posting/ bottom posting.. it's really the content that matters..
hmmm, well you know what i mean

"Maestro" <> wrote in message
news:01cc01c361ba$82a0bf50$...
I went off on a rant, but my only real point was that
there are some that prefer top posting and have their
reasons and some that prefer bottom posting and have their
reasons. Neither is right or wrong regardless of our
personal opinions. It made no sense to me to attack the
previous poster for being a top poster. No I don't read
bottom to top, but at the same time if I already know
what's been posted I don't want to have to scroll through
a bunch of old stuff to get to the new stuff. That may
not make sense to you and that's fine. Like I said we
have preferences (reasons).

As a side note though, if I had my way top posting would
be the law...

>-----Original Message-----
>"Maestro" <> wrote in message
>news:09bd01c361b2$28b21be0$...
>> Who the f*ck do you think that you are to dictate how
>> anyone post in this newsgroup.
>
>He was not dictating, he was asking.
>
>> If you don't like the way
>> they're posted, skip em.
>
>That would be fine if there was some way to know before
opening the post
>that it was top-posted. I don't see to many subject
lines with [Warning:
>Top poster] included.
>
>> Perhaps you're ass backwards!
>
>Do you read from bottom to top? Do you also read from
right to left?
>Shalom!
>
>> Some of the crap complained about in here borders on
>> ridiculous. If that's the only thing you have to worry
>> about you're living a divine life. You bottom
posting...
>> oh nevermind.
>
>We'll cross that border someday. Stay tuned.
>
>
>--
>Fris "Please, Mr. Postman" bee® MCNGP #13
>
>http://www.mcngp.tk
>The MCNGP Team - We're here to help
>
>.
>

 

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:01:28 -0700, "Consultant"
<> wrote:

>i resent that ;-)
>

Hehehe.. but you do, knowing it's wrong,. just to be a butt... he's
doing it because he's clueless.

 

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:46:57 -0700, "Maestro" <>
wrote:


>As a side note though, if I had my way top posting would
>be the law...

Thank goodness you don't have your way. The millions of people who
know how to post properly would likely try to hunt you down and 'show
you the way'

 

No, because I'd send them all to Top Posting Bootcamp.

>-----Original Message-----
>On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:46:57 -0700, "Maestro"
<>
>wrote:
>
>
>>As a side note though, if I had my way top posting would
>>be the law...
>
>Thank goodness you don't have your way. The millions of
people who
>know how to post properly would likely try to hunt you
down and 'show
>you the way'
>
>.
>

 

true, true

"|{evin" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:01:28 -0700, "Consultant"
> <> wrote:
>
> >i resent that ;-)
> >
>
> Hehehe.. but you do, knowing it's wrong,. just to be a butt... he's
> doing it because he's clueless.
>