Linksys GIG v's Cisco Gig

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Gary, Oct 14, 2006.

  1. Gary

    Gary Guest

    I can buy a linksys GIG Switch for about $400 while the same port density on
    a Cisco costs $3000

    If I do not need any of the bells and whistles like VLAN's/QoS etc. can I
    assume the Linksys will perform at the same speeds and performance.

    As Cisco have bought em I assume they were becoming a threat in some way.

    G
     
    Gary, Oct 14, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. In article <iC9Yg.7803$eZ4.3331@dukeread06>, Gary <> wrote:
    >I can buy a linksys GIG Switch for about $400 while the same port density on
    >a Cisco costs $3000


    >If I do not need any of the bells and whistles like VLAN's/QoS etc. can I
    >assume the Linksys will perform at the same speeds and performance.


    No, that's not a good assumption at all; it would be false for most
    inexpensive gigabit switches. And unfortunately it is often quite
    difficult to find independant reviews that aren't just a rewriting
    of the advertising brochure.

    Someone did point out an inexpensive linksys to me recently, for which
    I -was- able to find a positive independant review; it was the SD2008
    (a design from a couple of years ago), and the review is at
    http://soltesz.net/sd2008/part3.html
    It's pretty good considering the price, but it does *not* get
    gigabit at minimum packet size (which is what Cisco measures),
    and the latency creeps up with packet size. The SD2008 is completely
    unmanaged. I found a number of reviews that says that the fan on it
    is quite noisy and that it runs hot; one review said it ran quiet and
    cool, so it is possible they changed the fan design along the way.
     
    Walter Roberson, Oct 14, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Gary

    Gary Guest

    "Walter Roberson" <> wrote in message
    news:iS9Yg.139517$5R2.4951@pd7urf3no...
    > In article <iC9Yg.7803$eZ4.3331@dukeread06>, Gary <>
    > wrote:
    >>I can buy a linksys GIG Switch for about $400 while the same port density
    >>on
    >>a Cisco costs $3000

    >
    >>If I do not need any of the bells and whistles like VLAN's/QoS etc. can I
    >>assume the Linksys will perform at the same speeds and performance.

    >
    > No, that's not a good assumption at all; it would be false for most
    > inexpensive gigabit switches. And unfortunately it is often quite
    > difficult to find independant reviews that aren't just a rewriting
    > of the advertising brochure.
    >
    > Someone did point out an inexpensive linksys to me recently, for which
    > I -was- able to find a positive independant review; it was the SD2008
    > (a design from a couple of years ago), and the review is at
    > http://soltesz.net/sd2008/part3.html
    > It's pretty good considering the price, but it does *not* get
    > gigabit at minimum packet size (which is what Cisco measures),
    > and the latency creeps up with packet size. The SD2008 is completely
    > unmanaged. I found a number of reviews that says that the fan on it
    > is quite noisy and that it runs hot; one review said it ran quiet and
    > cool, so it is possible they changed the fan design along the way.
    >


    Trying to find reviews of the SR2024 and tech sheet but there is precious
    little. Blurb says:
    The 24-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch provides non-blocking, wire speed
    switching

    Price comarison is $400 v's $Loads for anything Gig from Cisco.

    Gary
     
    Gary, Oct 14, 2006
    #3
  4. In article <L6bYg.7808$eZ4.4268@dukeread06>, Gary <> wrote:

    >Trying to find reviews of the SR2024 and tech sheet but there is precious
    >little. Blurb says:
    >The 24-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch provides non-blocking, wire speed
    >switching


    Consider the SRW2024 instead -- at least you'll get WebView so
    you can do some remote configuration.

    The SR2024 and SRW2024 both review as having a loud fan.

    Real information... hard to find. There's some nuggets here,
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustratingReview.asp?item=N82E16833124049


    I found a mid-sized thread from someone using the SRW's who couldn't
    get more than 300 Mbit/s throughput; no-one was able to come up
    with anything that helped his particular situation (whatever the
    actual cause was.) There was a useful resource in there,

    http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/nethub/article.php/3485486
    "Squeeze Your Gigabit NIC for Top Performance"


    I skimmed over lots of other links, but the rest was just fluff or
    ads or people asking whether anyone knew anything about them...
     
    Walter Roberson, Oct 15, 2006
    #4
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
  1. Pavlov
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    680
    Aaron Leonard
    Jan 12, 2004
  2. Denny B

    Internet Explorer v 5.5 to v 6.0 worth it ?

    Denny B, Jul 19, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    891
    Boomer
    Jul 20, 2003
  3. David Ellis

    dye v. pigment and glossy v. mat?

    David Ellis, Oct 13, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    13
    Views:
    3,376
    Tony Whitaker
    Oct 24, 2003
  4. Beck

    zoom V's spot metering V's macro

    Beck, May 9, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    631
  5. grappletech
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    874
    grappletech
    Mar 9, 2007
  6. Al K

    OneCare v Kaspersky6 v ZoneAlarm7 v McAfee

    Al K, May 28, 2007, in forum: Computer Security
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    526
    David H. Lipman
    May 28, 2007
  7. Great Deals
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,126
    Trendkill
    Sep 10, 2007
  8. Will
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    4,283
    seanpaul
    Nov 25, 2011
Loading...