"L" lens technology or "DO" technology??

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by °..Jan Plexy..°, Oct 2, 2005.

  1. Which one is better?

    thx
     
    °..Jan Plexy..°, Oct 2, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. °..Jan Plexy..°

    Bill Guest

    The two are not mutually exclusive.

    The L designator refers to the high end optical quality of Canon lenses,
    while DO merely refers to a specific type of element within a lense.
     
    Bill, Oct 3, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. °..Jan Plexy..°

    Jim Townsend Guest

    Canon's DO lenses are part of their 'L' line.. Since DO lenses
    are 'L' lenses, it's hard to say which is better.

    For a given focal length, the 'L' DO lenses are smaller and
    lighter than their non DO 'L' counterparts...

    That's the difference.
     
    Jim Townsend, Oct 3, 2005
    #3
  4. °..Jan Plexy..°

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Not true. There are two DO lenses and neither is an L lens.
    (400mm f4 DO & 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO).

    Which is "better"? Well, the L lenses tend to produce better
    images while the DO lenses tend to be a lot more compact.
    So it depends upon what is important.
     
    Ray Fischer, Oct 4, 2005
    #4
  5. °..Jan Plexy..°

    SamSez Guest

    (Ray Fischer) wrote in @bolt.sonic.net:
    They also have their 'quirks'. See:

    http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/70_300/index.htm
    http://www.photo.net/equipment/canon/70-300do/
    http://www.photo.net/equipment/canon/70-300do_2/
     
    SamSez, Oct 4, 2005
    #5
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.