Hi, Awhile ago, I bought a DSC-P72 for my daughter. She's been using it for awhile, and has been getting good results. So, when it came time for my birthday, I asked for a DSC-P92. I figured that if the P72 was all right, the P92 should be even better (3MP vs. 5MP). I've been using the P92 for about 2 months now, and I note that I am getting quite a few out-of-focus shots. At first I thought it was because of camera shake, but in a lot of these shots, I can tell that it isn't (e.g., by looking at background edges, etc. I did a side-by-side comparison of the P72 vs. the P92 tonight, with both cameras set at 1.2MP/Fine (which is what my daughter was using), and I had both cameras set for center AF (rather than the default multi AF) and I noted that the P92 has a slightly longer lens (min 8mm vs. 6mm for the P72). Also, it seems to me that the P92 takes longer to focus lock than the P72 takes, for the same subject and lighting (stationary subject, indoor lighting). Finally, it also seems that the pics from the P72 just are sharper than the ones from the P92, again with the same subject and lighting. I was wondering if this is just me, or has anyone experienced this (or explain it?), i.e., has anyone used both of these cameras and seen these same differences? Thanks, Jim