IPSEC Tunnel - LAN TO LAN - 3DES - SHA1 - 3K CONCENTRATOR to BEFSX41 ( LINKSYS )

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by none, Sep 11, 2006.

  1. none

    none Guest

    2006-09-10 01:59:54 Local6.Notice 192.168.1.250 10614 09/10/2006 01:59:54.480 SEV=4 IKE/119 RPT=222 x.x.x.x Group
    [x.x.x.x] PHASE 1 COMPLETED


    2006-09-10 02:00:50 Local6.Warning 192.168.1.250 10616 09/10/2006 02:00:50.350 SEV=3 IKE/134 RPT=19 x.x.x.x
    Group [x.x.x.x] Mismatch: Configured LAN-to-LAN proposal differs from negotiated proposal. Verify local and remote
    LAN-to-LAN connection lists.


    2006-09-10 02:00:50 Local6.Notice 192.168.1.250 10618 09/10/2006 02:00:50.350 SEV=4 IKE/119 RPT=223 x.x.x.x Group
    [x.x.x.x] PHASE 1 COMPLETED

    notice the local6.warning

    Is there a difference in the way the Linksys and Cisco devices handle the Phase I ISAKMP negotiation parameters?


    This is syslog snipet from 3K concentrator doing lan-to-lan session to a remote site on a dsl connection with a
    BEFSX41
     
    none, Sep 11, 2006
    #1

    1. Advertisements

  2. none

    Walter Roberson Guest

    My reading of that would be that the access-list on the Cisco side
    might not match the gui-entered destinations on the BEFSX41 side.
     
    Walter Roberson, Sep 11, 2006
    #2

    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. Has anyone successfully created a VPN tunnel between a Cisco 2600 and Linksys BEFSX41

  2. IPSec tunnel works to one concentrator, not another

  3. PIX 501 -> Linksys BEFSX41 via IPSec

  4. PIX lan-to-lan IPSEC comes up...no traffic passes tunnel

  5. lan-lan tunnel, pix-concentrator

  6. PIX & VPN Concentrator LAN-to-LAN Tunnel Disconnected

  7. Split-Tunneling on a PIX LAN-to-LAN Ipsec Tunnel

Loading...