IP unnumbered..in a ring?

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by A. Andrews, Jan 15, 2004.

  1. A. Andrews

    A. Andrews Guest

    Can you use IP unnumbered in you have your routers in a ring topology
    (serial WAN links, all T1s)?


    .....router A...........router b..........router c...
    . .
    . .
    .....router d.........router e.......................

    all devices having a loopback IP.

    thx
     
    A. Andrews, Jan 15, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. ~ Can you use IP unnumbered in you have your routers in a ring topology
    ~ (serial WAN links, all T1s)?
    ~
    ~
    ~ .....router A...........router b..........router c...
    ~ . .
    ~ . .
    ~ .....router d.........router e.......................
    ~
    ~ all devices having a loopback IP.
    ~
    ~ thx

    Sure.
     
    Aaron Leonard, Jan 16, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. A. Andrews

    A. Andrews Guest

    Thanks Aaron

    What about Cisco works 2000, I guess you will just use the loopback IP
    for management.

    Any ideas about MRTG, would yoou be able to get it to work then?
    Wondering?



    Aaron Leonard <> wrote in message news:<>...
    > ~ Can you use IP unnumbered in you have your routers in a ring topology
    > ~ (serial WAN links, all T1s)?
    > ~
    > ~
    > ~ .....router A...........router b..........router c...
    > ~ . .
    > ~ . .
    > ~ .....router d.........router e.......................
    > ~
    > ~ all devices having a loopback IP.
    > ~
    > ~ thx
    >
    > Sure.
     
    A. Andrews, Jan 16, 2004
    #3
  4. No idea about the SNMP stuff. SNMP should look
    at interfaces rather than IP addresses, so it SHOULD
    be cool with this design, but I've heard of some
    SNMP management software that has attitude about
    how you're supposed to address things.

    Aaron

    ---

    ~ Thanks Aaron
    ~
    ~ What about Cisco works 2000, I guess you will just use the loopback IP
    ~ for management.
    ~
    ~ Any ideas about MRTG, would yoou be able to get it to work then?
    ~ Wondering?
    ~
    ~
    ~
    ~ Aaron Leonard <> wrote in message news:<>...
    ~ > ~ Can you use IP unnumbered in you have your routers in a ring topology
    ~ > ~ (serial WAN links, all T1s)?
    ~ > ~
    ~ > ~
    ~ > ~ .....router A...........router b..........router c...
    ~ > ~ . .
    ~ > ~ . .
    ~ > ~ .....router d.........router e.......................
    ~ > ~
    ~ > ~ all devices having a loopback IP.
    ~ > ~
    ~ > ~ thx
    ~ >
    ~ > Sure.
     
    Aaron Leonard, Jan 16, 2004
    #4
  5. On 16 Jan 2004 04:41:30 -0800, A. Andrews wrote:
    > Thanks Aaron
    >
    > What about Cisco works 2000, I guess you will just use the loopback IP
    > for management.


    I don't know about cw2000, earlier versions used matching subnets
    to connect 2 routers, but I believe later versions can use CDP
    too, and then it should be able to work it out.

    > Any ideas about MRTG, would yoou be able to get it to work then?
    > Wondering?


    MRTG will work just fine, all it needs is a address it can use to
    communicate with the router, which you have.

    --
    Jesper Skriver, CCIE #5456, FreeBSD committer
     
    Jesper Skriver, Jan 17, 2004
    #5
  6. A. Andrews

    A. Andrews Guest

    thats everyone. We mocked it up and it worked fine.

    Aaron Leonard <> wrote in message news:<>...
    > No idea about the SNMP stuff. SNMP should look
    > at interfaces rather than IP addresses, so it SHOULD
    > be cool with this design, but I've heard of some
    > SNMP management software that has attitude about
    > how you're supposed to address things.
    >
    > Aaron
    >
    > ---
    >
    > ~ Thanks Aaron
    > ~
    > ~ What about Cisco works 2000, I guess you will just use the loopback IP
    > ~ for management.
    > ~
    > ~ Any ideas about MRTG, would yoou be able to get it to work then?
    > ~ Wondering?
    > ~
    > ~
    > ~
    > ~ Aaron Leonard <> wrote in message news:<>...
    > ~ > ~ Can you use IP unnumbered in you have your routers in a ring topology
    > ~ > ~ (serial WAN links, all T1s)?
    > ~ > ~
    > ~ > ~
    > ~ > ~ .....router A...........router b..........router c...
    > ~ > ~ . .
    > ~ > ~ . .
    > ~ > ~ .....router d.........router e.......................
    > ~ > ~
    > ~ > ~ all devices having a loopback IP.
    > ~ > ~
    > ~ > ~ thx
    > ~ >
    > ~ > Sure.
     
    A. Andrews, Jan 19, 2004
    #6
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
  1. Evgeny Vainerman
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    670
    Helmut Ulrich
    Jan 15, 2004
  2. AM

    Ip unnumbered loopback0

    AM, Sep 12, 2005, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    9,941
  3. Slumpy

    Ring ring....ring ring....

    Slumpy, Jul 6, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    963
    Brian H¹©
    Jul 6, 2003
  4. Jim Hawkins

    Digi-slave L-Ring Ultra II LED Ring Light

    Jim Hawkins, Aug 16, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    2,144
    Jim Hawkins
    Aug 16, 2005
  5. Ring Ring This Away

    , Nov 5, 2005, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    932
  6. tua
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    924
  7. PAJ
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    2,738
    Dave Saville
    Dec 1, 2008
  8. tweety

    ip unnumbered

    tweety, Jan 28, 2009, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    2,255
    poori401
    Nov 11, 2011
Loading...