Hook Up DVD Player to a Flat Screen PC Monitor?

Discussion in 'DVD Video' started by weft2, Feb 5, 2006.

  1. weft2

    weft2 Guest

    Is it possible to hook up a stand alone dvd player to a flat screen pc
    monitor? I notice the plug end which goes into the pc from the monitor
    is the typical squarish, multi pinned type. Is there an adaptor out
    there which will fit on this end and then input into the typical round
    yellow video jack on most dvd players, vcrs and tvs? I ask, because I
    created a vcd of a friend's vacation photos and tried playing the video
    cd for them on their dvd player (which also plays vcd's). However, I
    found the picture quality, though full screen and inputting into their
    decent quality Sony 20" TV, to be much, much poorer than when I watched
    the photos full screen on my flat screen pc monitor at home (which
    unfortunately is attached to a pc tower which I don't want to lug over
    to my friend's pc-less place.) OTOH, my small, flat screen Ben-Q
    monitor I could easily transport if I could get a hookup for it to
    attach to a dvd player. Thanks for any advice.
    weft2, Feb 5, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  2. Most monitors have at least one of the following: VGA (15 pin usu. blue
    cable), and DVI (pin number varies by type). Ideally, their DVD player
    has the same (or a compatible) DVI interface (for a list:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVI). If their DVD player has VGA out,
    that will probably be the easiest (no need to worry about
    compatibility). Some monitors also offer composite (yellow cable),
    S-Video (4 pin cable), or Component (red, blue, green) in, but chances
    are the monitor won't display in a higher resolution with those inputs
    (the exception being component).
    Nicholas Andrade, Feb 5, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  3. weft2

    Rich Clark Guest

    But the vast majority of monitors have only a VGA input (as the OP
    describes), and the vast majority of DVD players have only analog video
    outputs (component, s-video, composite). So the likelihood is that the OP
    will need a scan converter to accomplish his hookup, which means spending
    $60 or more and not getting very good results.

    The reason for the difference in photo quality the OP noticed is because the
    video resolution of a VCD (640x480 maximum) is far lower than that of the
    original PC display and display card (at least 1024x768, probably much
    higher). Plus, the change in pixel shape converting to NTSC usually makes
    photos look like crap unless you (or your software) compensates for it.

    Rich Clark, Feb 6, 2006
  4. weft2

    Roy L. Fuchs Guest

    Purchase the ViewSonic video processor. It even accepts progressive
    scan input, and pipes it to your PC monitor. It also has a cable
    tuner in it!

    Roy L. Fuchs, Feb 6, 2006
  5. weft2

    Roy L. Fuchs Guest

    There are plenty of VERY GOOD video processors out there.


    Hahahaha... this makes no sense. Pixel shape? Sure.... OK.
    Roy L. Fuchs, Feb 6, 2006
  6. weft2

    Rich Clark Guest

    None of which can make NTSC video look like a computer display.
    Analog video has rectangular pixels. Computer displays have square pixels.
    "Pixel shape." Get it?

    Rich Clark, Feb 6, 2006
  7. weft2

    Roy L. Fuchs Guest

    Bullshit. They are up to NS-5 now, and even my NS-2 puts out NTSC as
    well as HDTV inputs to my PC monitor at 1280x1024 just fine.
    Flawlessly in fact.
    Yes, except it has nothing to do with signal content. The pixels
    are fired by the electron gun and managed by the shadow mask, or
    aperture grill(e).


    You are outside your realm of knowledge apparently, or you are making
    something more complex than it is. Either way, your opinion seems to
    be tainted by an experience with OLD technology.

    Do you have a cite that describes anything about the signal managing
    pixel shape? No, you cannot. Why? They manage scan lines and scan
    line count... period. The signal content has NOTHING to do with pixel

    You should refrain from making remarks based on a very old
    technology with which you are familiar with, ie "scan converters". It
    is not related to the modern version. Also, your knowledge of the
    subject itself seems outdated. Reminds me of the old video cards that
    could not put out to an HDTV monitor, despite having a DVI output.
    You claim scan converters suck because you haven't even looked at one
    since the crappy version you apparently experienced some years ago.
    You need to look at them again, because they are fairly flawless these

    The viewsonic device I have here is MADE to put out to a VGA
    monitor. It accepts several forms of input up to and including
    progressive scan HDTV signaling. It converts them all just fine, and
    does so quite precisely. It even has a cable tuner in it, so I think
    it handles NTSC just fine.

    Try again.
    Roy L. Fuchs, Feb 6, 2006
  8. weft2

    Rich Clark Guest

    The OP's source is a VCD. Nothing a scan converter can do to change that.
    I love you guys who spew all your advanced knowledge without trying to solve
    the OP's problem. He wants to know why his VCD's look like crap on his TV,
    and whether connecting his DVD player to an LCD monitor would help. It
    won't, and you know it. Tell him to buy a scan converter if you want to. It
    won't make his VCDs look any better than they do on an analog TV.

    Rich Clark, Feb 6, 2006
  9. weft2

    Roy L. Fuchs Guest

    That still does NOT preclude the fact that a video processor is the
    best way to get DVD output onto a PC monitor.
    I answered the question asked in the topic quite precisely, dumbass.
    VCDs look like crap on anything except a tiny 320x200 or 640x480
    window on your PC monitor's higher res screen.
    I never once said that it would.
    See above. I never said it would.
    That answers the question he posed in the topic header.
    I never said it would. I also didn't notice you giving him any
    links to a cite regarding lossy compression.

    Roy L. Fuchs, Feb 6, 2006
  10. weft2

    Roy L. Fuchs Guest

    You need to re-scan them at a higher resolution with a lossless
    method. Look into the manner that Kodak uses as their products do not
    appear the way you describe on larger TV monitors.
    Roy L. Fuchs, Feb 6, 2006
  11. weft2

    Roy L. Fuchs Guest

    Not only did I answer the question he posed in the topic header, but
    I also answered the very first question he asked in the body of the

    No. he specifically wanted to know what I answered him about. He
    MENTIONED a problem with his picture CD. The "answer" you gave wasn't
    even correct. He said they looked bad on the LARGER TV monitor.
    Therefore the answer to his problem was to re-scan the STILL images
    with a lossless manner that DVD players will still recognize, like the
    way Kodak does it, as most will play that format.
    Nope. He didn't ask if it would help. He STATED that that
    particular monitor was easy to transport and that he would use that
    Roy L. Fuchs, Feb 6, 2006
  12. weft2

    M.B. Guest

    My God you are an asshole, aren't you!? Heaven forbid you should answer
    a question or make a post without insulting someone. Forgive us O
    Mighty One for not being as smart as you!

    M.B., Feb 6, 2006
  13. weft2

    TB Guest

    "Roy L. Fuchs" whined like a litle girl:
    Cool. So you can actually brag that you're better than someone who filters
    you, seeing as you're a "usenet retard" n' all. LOL!

    TB, Feb 6, 2006
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.