Has anyone else noticed...

Discussion in 'MCSE' started by Susan, Dec 31, 2003.

  1. Susan

    Susan Guest

    Hey...passed the 296, have to re-take the 292, though. Just wondering for
    those who are getting the 2003 upgrade, if they thought that 70-292 was very
    very hard?? The choices for answers seemed to have such minute differences.

    Disclaimer: In case I gave to much information about the test, I take it
    back. Otherwise, what do y'all think?
    Susan, Dec 31, 2003
    1. Advertisements

  2. Susan

    Guest Guest

    I did 292 and 296 beginning of December (292 on 4th, 296 on 5th). I also thought that 292 was harder than 296 (only slightly though). Maybe it was the large number of DNS questions at the start of the exam

    MCDBA in SQL Server 200
    MCSE in Windows Server 2003 (early achiever
    MCSA in Windows Server 2003 (early achiever
    MCSE in Windows 2000 (early achiever
    MCSA in Windows 2000 (charter member
    MCSE in Windows NT

    *** And now for a long rest :) ***
    Guest, Dec 31, 2003
    1. Advertisements

  3. thought that 292 was harder than 296 (only slightly
    Hello Richard,

    I took and passed easily the 292 test becoming MCSA 2003 "early achiever"!

    You really think that 296 is easier as 292 ?

    For information, I already passed the beta test of 294 (AD).

    Another way could be to take the 293(Network), is it a good idea?

    I'm not sure of that!


    MCSE in Windows 2000 (early achiever)
    MCSA in Windows 2000
    MCSE in Windows NT4
    MCSE in Windows NT3.51
    MCDBA 7 and 2000

    Meilleurs voeux pour cette année 2004!

    [MCSE option Messaging, MCSA 2003].
    Site personnel: http://webfamilial.dyndns.org/thierry/pageprincipale.htm
    Thierry DEMAN [MVP], Jan 3, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.