FWSM/PIX and Dynamic PAT using global IP range vs. global interface vs. global IP

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Hoffa, Oct 25, 2006.

  1. Hoffa

    Hoffa Guest

    Greetings all

    I was just woundering one thing while configuring a new PAT setup in
    our FWSM. You have the option of using an IP range, a single IP or the
    IP of the "external" interface as GLOBAL address for the PAT.
    I've searched some of the guides regarding this subject but haven't
    really seen any recommendation when to use the different methods other
    than the possible shortage of ports when using single IP and large
    number of computers.

    Does anyone have any experience in using the different methods and have
    any recommendations? Is there a disadvantage when using GLOBAL
    interface instead of GLOBAL IP for example?

    Regards
    Fredrik Hofreb
     
    Hoffa, Oct 25, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
  1. Replies:
    4
    Views:
    7,247
    mostro
    Oct 29, 2005
  2. BinSur
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    6,382
    BinSur
    Jan 13, 2006
  3. swapnendu
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,194
    swapnendu
    Nov 4, 2006
  4. Hoffa
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    3,111
    Walter Roberson
    Oct 25, 2006
  5. Robert Feinman

    Scene range vs dynamic range

    Robert Feinman, Jun 30, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,097
    Marvin
    Jul 4, 2005
  6. Hrdalen
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    786
    Hrdalen
    Jun 15, 2007
  7. Replies:
    7
    Views:
    3,614
    Marc Luethi
    Nov 26, 2007
  8. Diego Balgera
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    8,281
    Johann Lo
    Feb 8, 2008
Loading...