Earth Photography: It's Harder Than It Looks

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by me, Feb 27, 2012.

  1. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Yes. Are you babbling irrelevant nonsense because yo're being paid by
    Big Oil to push disinformation and propaganda?
    So what?
    You mean when an asteroid caused massive amounts of dust to be thrown
    up into the atmosphere, causing worldwide cooling?

    Kind of like the pollution that caused cooling 40 years ago?
    Nobody said that it was, idiot.
    You're arguing against your own strawman and certainly not addressing
    anything that I actually wrote.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 21, 2012
    1. Advertisements

  2. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Kerby continues to be an obsessed little stalker.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 21, 2012
    1. Advertisements

  3. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    So fracking and cooking tar sands is no longer needed, denier?
    You're an idiot.
    The facts which you try very hard to ignore.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 21, 2012
  4. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    BZZZT! You tripped the bullshit detector.

    It's not "technical literature". It's "science journals".
    Reading the opinions of people who tell you what you want to hear and
    feed into your conspiracy nonsense.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 21, 2012
  5. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    No, you won't. You never moan about your complete lack of facts.
    And there's the denier bullshit again. No facts, no evidence. Just
    one lie after another.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 21, 2012
  6. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Are you crazy or stupid? You're whining about events that happened
    millions of years ago because you can't deal with the present?
    Ray Fischer, Mar 21, 2012
  7. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    But you claimed that it's not hard to extract oil and gas. Why would
    anybody need to deal with tar sands?
    Ray Fischer, Mar 21, 2012
  8. Regards???

    IAE, Ray will not cite facts, just call you names.

    And, you guys, trim your damned posts!
    John McWilliams, Mar 21, 2012
  9. Yo, Duck- You have no idea how many folks are reading this illuminating

    John McWilliams, Mar 22, 2012
  10. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Nope. Only four hits, none relevant.

    Without the quotes, I don't see any relevant. Maybe you should be
    specific instead of spouting your usual denier bullshit.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  11. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Back at you, hypocrite. I keep asking you for cites and references and
    you just fart more bullshit and lies.

    Where is YOUR evidence for your claim about air pollution?
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  12. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    AND a certain yap-yap dog.

    "arf-arf -- arf (pant) arf-arf (pant) (pant) arf"
    kerby in <C6CD2583.33D14%>
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  13. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    You're the obsessed little stalker.

    I'm not.
    Maybe before you started drinking so heavily.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  14. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Notice that the denier can't even explain his own little whining,
    cvan't provide facts, can't provide cites for his claims, can't even
    justify his absurd conspiracy nonsense.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  15. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Oh, so you're saying that it is EXPENSIVE to extract oil from tar
    sands. One wonders why anybody would use an expensive extraction
    method when oil is so plentiful, according to you.
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  16. Truth.

    Wolfgang Weisselberg, Mar 22, 2012
  17. Awww, the drunkard is denying that he's drunk again. And doesn't
    know what he's saying. (His parents will rotate in their graves.)

    Poor Ray.

    Denial isn't just a river in Egypt ... you also project your
    faults onto others, Ray.

    Wolfgang Weisselberg, Mar 22, 2012
  18. [/QUOTE]
    Ah, that explains a lot.

    Some of us seem to live in a completely different world, and
    it seems in Disc-World tree ring climate data is indeed direct
    temperature data.

    Wolfgang Weisselberg, Mar 22, 2012
  19. So why do you want us to believe in the work of fiction
    called "global warming is man-made and ongoing"?

    Facts are *supposed* to be grounded in reality, not just look
    like they agree with you, Ray?

    Your strawman.

    Ray, you're projecting again: you are denying all facts against
    your fixed opinion. That makes you a crackpot.

    And according to your own global warming logic, you are producing
    lots of carbon dioxide. E.g. by using computers, getting foodstuff
    and generally living. Maybe you should reduce your CO2 impact ...

    Wolfgang Weisselberg, Mar 22, 2012
  20. *You* claimed categorucally that it is fiction, so *you* have to
    prove now that it is fiction.

    Since you have closed your eyes very firmly, this may even be
    completely true.

    You aren't a scientist either. You are not even particularly
    well informed, nor are you citing lots of studies.

    Which makes you --- by your *own* standards --- even less
    reputable than the autor, a know-nothing.

    You are insisting that thousands of the world's scientists are
    all wrong when they claim something that's detrimal (to the point
    of half sucicide) to their careers?

    You claim that massive political and peer pressure isn't happening?

    And as a proof you cite your own (non-scientistic) words that
    you flog because you're a fanatic?!?

    Says you, who isn't a scientist and can't back up his own words.
    You're not even "any sort of credible authority", you're a
    completely disbelievable non-authority.

    So, by your own logic, why should we take *your* word on anything?

    Wolfgang Weisselberg, Mar 22, 2012
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.