Do any P4's over a gig speed use PC-133 Ram?

Ah, using "we" trying to co-opt the "strength of the group" to support your
own pissy little rant.

And you figure your ineffectual whining is going to improve it?

So you feel computer repair is unrelated to electronics and that those with
an interest in electronics are not likely to be into computer repair. Sure
thing.

So a query about computer hardware has no place in groups specifically
related to computer hardware.

To follow this to it's ludicrous conclusion would eliminate the point of
newsgroups altogether. The advantage to getting "live" responses is that you
get detail and feedback if something isn't clear, and the info is likely to
be more current. In addition, you get multiple points of view on a topic.
Just because something is on a website doesn't make it accurate or complete.

Hey, and it gives people like you a forum to vent your angst.

You mean like the non-informational noise you've introduced?

Ah, well now that's an interesting point. Disagreement between those
supposedly knowledgeable about a topic means someone's wrong. These pissing
contests arise in every forum I've ever seen, in many threads I had no input
into. Noone's forcing any of the participants to argue. You're shaking your
fist at human nature. When it's actually about a point of information, not
just carping such as you're engaging in, this is actually beneficial since
as I mentioned previously, it gives you more than one point of view, food
for thought and makes one aware of various issues. There are lots of folks
who claim to be knowledgeable who might have dubious credentials.

Only if they read the thread, which you're still not required to do.

If you're that worked up over it, start a moderated forum and you can play
netgod.

Ah, the calling card of the 2nd rate mind.

You're unable to control your compulsion to read a thread, and continue to
rant when it's not going to change anything. The dunce cap clearly fits you
the best.

Ready?

Here it comes.


5....4....3.....2....1


*plonk*

 

Ah, the royal "we". Still pontificating are you,
koRny?

*TimDaniels*

 

Unfortunately my newsreader has no convenient means of ignoring
articles on the basis of foolish over cross-posting without setting
follow-ups. So it is necessary to PLONK the thread.

--
Some informative links:
http://www.geocities.com/nnqweb/
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html

 

"We" were reading a thread that could be answered with a
search engine instead of excessive cross posting. That
truth contributes to the topic of the thread, as posted.
This is objective truth that contributes to the proper
function of usenet for everyone, "we", except the one
having the subjectively "odd" perception of it.

 

If you see a topic it either interests you or it doesn't. If it doesn't, you
don't have to read it. What else do you need to do to ignore a thread?