Difference between SanDisk Ultra II versus Extreme compact flash card?

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Warren, Oct 31, 2004.

  1. Warren

    Warren Guest

    What is the difference between these two cards? They seem to have the same
    read/write speed specifications.
     
    Warren, Oct 31, 2004
    #1

    1. Advertisements

  2. Warren

    Warren Guest

    Supplementary question. Is either card of any value in performance over and
    above the standard Sandisk card for a Canon A95 camera?
     
    Warren, Oct 31, 2004
    #2

    1. Advertisements

  3. Warren

    Bill Hilton Guest

    From: "Warren"
    I think they are the same speed (66x) but the Extreme is rated for a wider
    operating temperature range, from -25 to +85 Celsius ...
    http://www.sandisk.com/pressrelease/20040211a.html ...

    I have a 2 GB card of each of these and when measured in a Canon 1D Mark II
    they were almost identical, 3.71 MB/sec and 3.77 MB/sec.

    Bill
     
    Bill Hilton, Oct 31, 2004
    #3
  4. Warren

    S Lee Guest

    Warren choreographed a chorus line of high-kicking electrons to spell
    out:
    Probably not too significant.

    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canona95/page4.asp
     
    S Lee, Oct 31, 2004
    #4

    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. Will SanDisk Compact Flash card work in Nikon 5700?

  2. I Gb compact flash vs 512Mb (or even 256) compact flash

  3. Sandisk 1Gig ultra II compact flash card--any experiences?

  4. Problem with SanDisk 4GB Ultra II compact flash card

  5. Sandisk CF extreme vs.ultra II ??

  6. Difference between Sandisk Ultra II CF Cards???

  7. Sandisk 512MB Ultra II Cheaper Than Sandisk 512MB Regular SD Card

  8. SanDisk 64GB Ultra PLUS and Extreme SD

Loading...