civl rights? or just another law breaker?

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/14/georgia.student.immigration/index.html


While some are crying "civil rights violations" in the actions against a
student in Georgia, she is also knowingly violating the laws.

Although she may have legally entered the country, she failed to return
home when that permission was denied. As she becomes of age, she begins to
drive a car. She gets stopped and can't produce a driver's license. In the
meantime, she's also attending a college. So why are certain people
claiming "civil rights"? "Rights" do not belong to lawbreakers who can not
or will not become official residents.

 

On Sun, 16 May 2010 17:23:12 -0700, in the land of
24hoursupport.helpdesk, Evan Platt

Unfortunately for you, in this one specific instance, his stance is
supported by law. Settled law. She is in fact an illegal alien. There
is no doubt. The law is quite clear and while it may be morally
repugnant to enforce it upon a woman that has been here since age 11,
worked hard to become an educated and contributing member of society,
it is the law.

Now, if only st00pid was worth as much to society as that young woman
is now and would have been in the future.

 

Evan is a bleeding heart liberal who feels that simply because a person is
within the country, has all the rights he has.
In this case, the woman entered the country legally. Passports are issued
for a fix time so her passport would not be valid when she turned 18. When
the passport expires, you are in violation of the law. She refused to go
home, let alone apply for a valid passport. Therefore, she knowingly
violated the law.

As far as I'm concerned, even the college violated the law by not verifying
her legal right to be in the country. The state of Georgia is acting
correctly. Enforcing the law.

 

And you are a waste of oxygen and a drag upon the economy. Unlike that
educated and motivated young lady.

You are worth less than the lowest of the illegal aliens. Yet you feel
some need to feel superior. What exactly do you contribute to society?

Rest snipped because I am sure it was st00pid.

 

I fail to see how a law, which *has* been properly passed, legal or
not, out of Arizona's jurisdiction or not, has anything to do with the
very specific entries in the US bill of rights, which *do* apply to
*everyone* in the US BTW, whether they're a citizen or not.

Boot her out. Tomorrow. She's lost her bond, showed contempt of court
and was in the US illegally before that. She doesn't *get* any more
chances. You mess with a judge and you lose. Every time. Anyone that
doesn't maintain that reality has no interest in law and order at all.

I feel for the Mexican people. Especially now with the turmoil going on
in their country and money so close they can almost smell it, but this is
no way to change their lot in life.

Sure it's prejudice - in favour of one black idiot ruining it for the
others who are honest and decent people.

 

Read the constitution. It defines who is a citizen and who gets "rights".
She was stopped for a traffic violation. When she could not produce a
license or any other legal document stating she was a citizen, motions were
put in place to deport her.

The state says you need a driver's license. She had none. So why is the
violation of a state law a civil rights issue? Perhaps the "cause" is using
this incident for lack of anything else to use.

 

Oh, so If I visit the US, then I'm not allowed the right to remain
silent if I happen to be arrested? Of course I am. And they *have* to
merandize me as well. Just like they had to do with her.

And no, she was in the process of being deported before she ever got in
that car. That's *why* she didn't have a driver's licence in the first
place - she couldn't get one.

No, you completely missed (the somewhat twisted) point: her rights were
allegedly violated because Arizona has no jurisdiction to make
immigration laws. So therefore she couldn't have been arrested for it by
any Arizona cop. (I did say twisted).