[QUOTE]\nThat is irrelevant. The last time I had in depth discussions about\nsharpening with someone who know what that means and uses PS was about\ntwo months ago.\n\n\nBut do you know the difference between UnSharpMask, High Pass,\nand Deconvolutional sharpening? That's what counts, not using\nGIMP or PS.\n[/QUOTE]\n\nI hope I do.\nHowever what really counts is what works for the user. One method may be\n"better" in a technical sense, but if I am satisfied with the results of\nmy methods, who can say a different method is better. OTOH should I\nbecome dissatisfied with the look of my work, I certainly would feel\nfree to try other suggestions. Indeed Topaz InFocus uses a deconvolution\nalgorithm, for sharpening.