Another camera ditches the AA filter

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by RichA, Apr 16, 2013.

  1. RichA

    RichA Guest

    RichA, Apr 16, 2013
    1. Advertisements

  2. Bad lens. :)
    Probably made from plastics, just to make RichA unhappy.
    That may be a pattern ...

    Wolfgang Weisselberg, Apr 17, 2013
    1. Advertisements

  3. RichA

    RichA Guest

    I don't think they believe it'll be a real issue. The cost saving by
    eliminating the AA filter might be a consideration. Even though some
    companies actually charge more for a camera without one than with.
    RichA, Apr 18, 2013
  4. The D800E is said to be without an AA filter. In fact it has 1/2 an AA
    filter followed by a negative half AA filter. Or something like that.
    A case of WYSINWYG. Which is part of the reason for the extra cost.
    Chris Malcolm, Apr 18, 2013
  5. RichA

    RichA Guest

    RichA, Apr 19, 2013
  6. Bull.

    It would be far costlier if you need to produce 2 different
    camera bodies with different optical paths. Remember that's
    mass manufacturing for a mass market, and only in that way
    you can have such complicated exact tools for such prices.

    The reason for the extra cost is that THE MAKET WILL BEAR IT.
    It's very hard to understand, I know, I know, but manufacturing
    costs and the money you pay for the item has absolutely
    no relation. Think "loss leader" and "hybrid costing" ---
    manufacturing costs are not even guaranteed to be a lower limit.

    Wolfgang Weisselberg, May 2, 2013
  7. RichA

    PeterN Guest

    OMG The world is about to come to an end. I am forced to agree.
    PeterN, May 3, 2013
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.