Windows XP x64 Edition Installation Issues

Discussion in 'Windows 64bit' started by =?Utf-8?B?andoMjA=?=, May 30, 2005.

  1. I'm trying to install the Windows XP x64 Edition on the following hardware:

    DFI LANPARTY nF4 Ultra-D motherboard
    AMD Athlon 64 3000+ CPU
    2GB PC3200 DDR RAM
    Seagate 200GB ATA/100 Hard Drive
    Kaser Radeon X300SE PCI-Express Video

    After the initial boot from CD and file installation the system reboots to
    the Windows GUI installation welcom screen and goes for a while. About 2/3 of
    the way through the "Installing Devices" section I get a BSOD which says:

    A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent damage
    to
    your computer.

    An attempt was made to write to read-only memory.

    etc....

    STOP: 0x000000BE (0xFFFFFADFC0E29000, 0x8000000030C01100,
    0xFFFFFADFC8C62040, 0x000000000000000E)

    I can restart the installation and the same thing happens exactly. This
    hardware
    operates perfectly under Windows XP Pro SP2.
    =?Utf-8?B?andoMjA=?=, May 30, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Are there any connected devices such as scanners or printers?
    --

    Andre
    http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
    FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

    "jwh20" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > I'm trying to install the Windows XP x64 Edition on the following
    > hardware:
    >
    > DFI LANPARTY nF4 Ultra-D motherboard
    > AMD Athlon 64 3000+ CPU
    > 2GB PC3200 DDR RAM
    > Seagate 200GB ATA/100 Hard Drive
    > Kaser Radeon X300SE PCI-Express Video
    >
    > After the initial boot from CD and file installation the system reboots to
    > the Windows GUI installation welcom screen and goes for a while. About
    > 2/3 of
    > the way through the "Installing Devices" section I get a BSOD which says:
    >
    > A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent
    > damage
    > to
    > your computer.
    >
    > An attempt was made to write to read-only memory.
    >
    > etc....
    >
    > STOP: 0x000000BE (0xFFFFFADFC0E29000, 0x8000000030C01100,
    > 0xFFFFFADFC8C62040, 0x000000000000000E)
    >
    > I can restart the installation and the same thing happens exactly. This
    > hardware
    > operates perfectly under Windows XP Pro SP2.
    Andre Da Costa, May 30, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. No, the only devices are those built-in to the motherboard, the video card, a
    floppy, a DVD/CD-RW drive (IDE), and an IDE HDD.


    "Andre Da Costa" wrote:

    > Are there any connected devices such as scanners or printers?
    > --
    >
    > Andre
    > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
    > FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
    >
    > "jwh20" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > I'm trying to install the Windows XP x64 Edition on the following
    > > hardware:
    > >
    > > DFI LANPARTY nF4 Ultra-D motherboard
    > > AMD Athlon 64 3000+ CPU
    > > 2GB PC3200 DDR RAM
    > > Seagate 200GB ATA/100 Hard Drive
    > > Kaser Radeon X300SE PCI-Express Video
    > >
    > > After the initial boot from CD and file installation the system reboots to
    > > the Windows GUI installation welcom screen and goes for a while. About
    > > 2/3 of
    > > the way through the "Installing Devices" section I get a BSOD which says:
    > >
    > > A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent
    > > damage
    > > to
    > > your computer.
    > >
    > > An attempt was made to write to read-only memory.
    > >
    > > etc....
    > >
    > > STOP: 0x000000BE (0xFFFFFADFC0E29000, 0x8000000030C01100,
    > > 0xFFFFFADFC8C62040, 0x000000000000000E)
    > >
    > > I can restart the installation and the same thing happens exactly. This
    > > hardware
    > > operates perfectly under Windows XP Pro SP2.

    >
    >
    >
    =?Utf-8?B?andoMjA=?=, May 30, 2005
    #3
  4. Are you using the download version of XP x64?
    Wayne Wastier, May 30, 2005
    #4
  5. Yes, I downloaded it from MSDN.



    "Wayne Wastier" wrote:

    > Are you using the download version of XP x64?
    >
    >
    >
    =?Utf-8?B?andoMjA=?=, May 30, 2005
    #5
  6. jwh20 wrote:
    > Yes, I downloaded it from MSDN.
    >


    Now you need to make sure your download was correct. Check to make sure that
    the checksum is correct.



    Note: I always half my burn speed, say my CDRW burner does 52, I set it for
    24. :)


    Wayne
    Wayne Wastier, May 30, 2005
    #6
  7. I recommend doing it at 16x. :)
    --

    Andre
    http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
    FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

    "Wayne Wastier" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > jwh20 wrote:
    >> Yes, I downloaded it from MSDN.
    >>

    >
    > Now you need to make sure your download was correct. Check to make sure
    > that the checksum is correct.
    >
    >
    >
    > Note: I always half my burn speed, say my CDRW burner does 52, I set it
    > for 24. :)
    >
    >
    > Wayne
    >
    Andre Da Costa, May 31, 2005
    #7
  8. I guess I don't see the point. No checksum is provided by Microsoft on the
    MSDN site so there is nothing to compare my copy to...



    "Wayne Wastier" wrote:

    > jwh20 wrote:
    > > Yes, I downloaded it from MSDN.
    > >

    >
    > Now you need to make sure your download was correct. Check to make sure that
    > the checksum is correct.
    >
    >
    >
    > Note: I always half my burn speed, say my CDRW burner does 52, I set it for
    > 24. :)
    >
    >
    > Wayne
    >
    >
    >
    =?Utf-8?B?andoMjA=?=, May 31, 2005
    #8
  9. Help arrived from tech support at DFI. To quote:

    >Dear Sir:
    >
    >I have noticed a number of real world users in the 64 bit forums at www.dfi-street.com , trying to load 64 bit and it
    >seems they have to go into bios and set CPC in dram configuration to DISABLE and load with a single stick in the topmost
    >Orange memory slot to get this early nearly untested 64 bit O/s to install. Thank you.
    >
    >Sincerely,
    >Robert AKA RGone...



    The CPC setting in the BIOS seems to be the culprit. The default setting is
    "Auto". I found that either "Auto" or "Enable" caused the BSOD on
    installation and also repeated reboots after installation. Setting to
    "Disable" made the installer happy as well made Windows happy after
    installation as well.



    "jwh20" wrote:

    > I'm trying to install the Windows XP x64 Edition on the following hardware:
    >
    > DFI LANPARTY nF4 Ultra-D motherboard
    > AMD Athlon 64 3000+ CPU
    > 2GB PC3200 DDR RAM
    > Seagate 200GB ATA/100 Hard Drive
    > Kaser Radeon X300SE PCI-Express Video
    >
    > After the initial boot from CD and file installation the system reboots to
    > the Windows GUI installation welcom screen and goes for a while. About 2/3 of
    > the way through the "Installing Devices" section I get a BSOD which says:
    >
    > A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent damage
    > to
    > your computer.
    >
    > An attempt was made to write to read-only memory.
    >
    > etc....
    >
    > STOP: 0x000000BE (0xFFFFFADFC0E29000, 0x8000000030C01100,
    > 0xFFFFFADFC8C62040, 0x000000000000000E)
    >
    > I can restart the installation and the same thing happens exactly. This
    > hardware
    > operates perfectly under Windows XP Pro SP2.
    =?Utf-8?B?andoMjA=?=, May 31, 2005
    #9

  10. >> this early nearly untested 64 bit O/s to install. Thank you.
    >>


    Nearly untested? What in the ....??? I think they have their heads up
    their collective a$$e$.
    Wayne Wastier, May 31, 2005
    #10
  11. Its just a reluctance thing to embrace 64 bit by most of these computer
    companies in the industry, which just a shame.
    --
    Andre
    Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
    Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
    http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
    FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

    "Wayne Wastier" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >
    >>> this early nearly untested 64 bit O/s to install. Thank you.
    >>>

    >
    > Nearly untested? What in the ....??? I think they have their heads up
    > their collective a$$e$.
    >
    Andre Da Costa [Extended64], May 31, 2005
    #11
  12. Andre Da Costa [Extended64] wrote:
    > Its just a reluctance thing to embrace 64 bit by most of these
    > computer companies in the industry, which just a shame.
    >


    Yup. :)
    Wayne Wastier, May 31, 2005
    #12
  13. I interpreted that to mean untested on DFI's part. That could very well be.

    Regardless, the suggestion worked perfectly, so at least someone seems to
    have a clue.

    Regards,


    jwh

    "Wayne Wastier" wrote:

    >
    > >> this early nearly untested 64 bit O/s to install. Thank you.
    > >>

    >
    > Nearly untested? What in the ....??? I think they have their heads up
    > their collective a$$e$.
    >
    >
    >
    =?Utf-8?B?andoMjA=?=, Jun 1, 2005
    #13
  14. jwh20 wrote:
    > I interpreted that to mean untested on DFI's part. That could very
    > well be.
    >


    And they call themselves business professionals. LOL


    Wayne
    Wayne Wastier, Jun 1, 2005
    #14
  15. Makes no sense to me.

    They (DFI) have designed a motherboard around a 64-bit CPU (AMD Athlon 64)
    with a 64-bit chipset, and they are reluctant to support a 64-bit OS? Go
    figure!!



    "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote:

    > Its just a reluctance thing to embrace 64 bit by most of these computer
    > companies in the industry, which just a shame.
    > --
    > Andre
    > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
    > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
    > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
    > FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
    >
    > "Wayne Wastier" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > >
    > >>> this early nearly untested 64 bit O/s to install. Thank you.
    > >>>

    > >
    > > Nearly untested? What in the ....??? I think they have their heads up
    > > their collective a$$e$.
    > >

    >
    >
    >
    =?Utf-8?B?andoMjA=?=, Jun 1, 2005
    #15
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. william tripney

    installation cd for windows xp home edition

    william tripney, Apr 12, 2004, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    397
    =?UTF-8?B?UGFsaW5kcuKYu21l?=
    Apr 12, 2004
  2. =?Utf-8?B?UGFzY2Fs?=
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    600
    Wayne Wastier
    Sep 25, 2005
  3. =?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?=

    CrystalCPUID Pure x64 Edition 4.8.2.311 (Vista/XP x64)

    =?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?=, Sep 21, 2006, in forum: Windows 64bit
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    706
    =?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?=
    Sep 21, 2006
  4. No Spam
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    414
    No Spam
    Jan 7, 2007
  5. umwhat
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    306
    umwhat
    Jun 19, 2008
Loading...

Share This Page