Unannounced Windows updates

Discussion in 'Computer Information' started by JTJersey, Sep 15, 2007.

  1. JTJersey

    JTJersey Guest

    Microsoft surreptitiously installed some updates to XP and Vista around
    August 24 in the early morning hours that bypassed users update
    settings. Even if you are set to only do manual updates or to only be
    alerted to updates that might be available, these updates were done
    anyway, without your knowledge or permission. Despite my Linux
    preferences, I run two Windows XP machines here and unauthorized hacking
    into my system concerns me. With a closed source OS like Windows there
    have always been unsubstantiated rumors of back-doors made available to
    (fill in the blank) agencies. I like XP and hate to think that Microsoft
    has the capability and determination to invade my privacy at will. At
    this date all MS offers is that it's an update to it's update program,
    but nothing about why it proceeded like this.

    http://tinyurl.com/33gsft


    --
    Registered Linux User #267152
     
    JTJersey, Sep 15, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. JTJersey

    Mr. Arnold Guest

    "JTJersey" <> wrote in message
    news:3dGGi.36690$...
    > Microsoft surreptitiously installed some updates to XP and Vista around
    > August 24 in the early morning hours that bypassed users update
    > settings. Even if you are set to only do manual updates or to only be
    > alerted to updates that might be available, these updates were done
    > anyway, without your knowledge or permission. Despite my Linux
    > preferences, I run two Windows XP machines here and unauthorized hacking
    > into my system concerns me. With a closed source OS like Windows there
    > have always been unsubstantiated rumors of back-doors made available to
    > (fill in the blank) agencies. I like XP and hate to think that Microsoft
    > has the capability and determination to invade my privacy at will. At
    > this date all MS offers is that it's an update to it's update program,
    > but nothing about why it proceeded like this.
    >


    So? There is nothing can be done about it other than not use M$. So, why
    worry about it. And who is to say that the same thing couldn't happen with
    Novell and Suse. You got more problems worrying about Identify Theft (some
    real damage) running around out here on the Internet, than one has worrying
    about this.
     
    Mr. Arnold, Sep 15, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. JTJersey

    nsag Guest

    Unless you can parse the source code how do you know what is in Linux?
    Open source means anyone can insert anything into a Linux program.
    Most Linux users do not employ effective security strategies because, like
    Mac users, they are lulled by the low number of attacks to think that
    malware/viruses do not exist in their little world.
    Wrong again . . . .
    Most analysts find that the Mac OS is actually less secure than Windows and
    Linux hardly any better.
     
    nsag, Sep 15, 2007
    #3
  4. JTJersey

    Mr. Arnold Guest

    "nsag" <> wrote in message
    news:RAVGi.53912$...
    > Unless you can parse the source code how do you know what is in Linux?
    > Open source means anyone can insert anything into a Linux program.
    > Most Linux users do not employ effective security strategies because, like
    > Mac users, they are lulled by the low number of attacks to think that
    > malware/viruses do not exist in their little world.
    > Wrong again . . . .
    > Most analysts find that the Mac OS is actually less secure than Windows
    > and Linux hardly any better.


    I got Linux on my network as well. Linux is just another piece of crap O/S
    written by fallible Human Beings, just like the other pieces of crap O/S(s),
    with fallible Human Beings sitting behind the wheel doing the clicking and
    typing. There is nothing special about Linux -- nothing.
     
    Mr. Arnold, Sep 15, 2007
    #4
  5. JTJersey

    JTJersey Guest

    On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:34:25 +0000, nsag wrote:

    > Unless you can parse the source code how do you know what is in Linux?
    > Open source means anyone can insert anything into a Linux program. Most
    > Linux users do not employ effective security strategies because, like
    > Mac users, they are lulled by the low number of attacks to think that
    > malware/viruses do not exist in their little world. Wrong again . . . .
    > Most analysts find that the Mac OS is actually less secure than Windows
    > and Linux hardly any better.



    Oh please. The fact that anybody can look at the Linux source code in
    itself would preclude someone writing in a backdoor such as this Windows
    exploit, because somebody else would see it and it would be all over the
    world in hours. And how would you know what most Linux users do about
    their security?

    --
    Registered Linux User #267152
     
    JTJersey, Sep 15, 2007
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. The Celtic Warrior

    Did today's Windows updates break wireless??

    The Celtic Warrior, Jul 14, 2004, in forum: Wireless Networking
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,220
    Guest
    Jul 15, 2004
  2. =?Utf-8?B?a2Vob2xtZXM=?=

    Cisco 350 card, XP and Windows Updates

    =?Utf-8?B?a2Vob2xtZXM=?=, May 5, 2005, in forum: Wireless Networking
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    465
    =?Utf-8?B?a2Vob2xtZXM=?=
    May 5, 2005
  3. =?Utf-8?B?UGVhZGFy?=

    windows Critical updates xp 2

    =?Utf-8?B?UGVhZGFy?=, Feb 22, 2005, in forum: Microsoft Certification
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    516
    =?Utf-8?B?UGVhZGFy?=
    Feb 22, 2005
  4. =?Utf-8?B?Qy5SaW5hbGRp?=

    Windows/Office recommended updates

    =?Utf-8?B?Qy5SaW5hbGRp?=, Sep 29, 2005, in forum: Microsoft Certification
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    570
    =?Utf-8?B?Qy5SaW5hbGRp?=
    Sep 29, 2005
  5. =?Utf-8?B?d2xzNTA4?=

    checking "Show Updates" doesn't reveal any Windows XP updates

    =?Utf-8?B?d2xzNTA4?=, May 24, 2006, in forum: Windows 64bit
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    725
    Martin S.
    May 26, 2006
Loading...

Share This Page