traffic-shaping limit ftp traffic

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Hypno999, Oct 7, 2005.

  1. Hypno999

    Hypno999 Guest

    I'm trying to limit the ftp traffic on 512 frame link to 400000 bits,
    so there is still some space left for telnet, http, etc.

    This is what I've setup so far but no luck:

    interface Serial0/0
    traffic-shape group 101 400000 400000 400000 1000
    traffic-shape group 102 400000 400000 400000 1000

    access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq ftp
    access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq ftp-data
    access-list 102 permit tcp any eq ftp any
    access-list 102 permit tcp any eq ftp-data any

    any ideas? THanks, Tom.
    Hypno999, Oct 7, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Hypno999

    Make Guest

    Any hits: show access-list 101?
    show traffic-shape
    show traffic-shape statistics

    try this: traffic-shape group 101 400000


    > interface Serial0/0
    > traffic-shape group 101 400000 400000 400000 1000
    > traffic-shape group 102 400000 400000 400000 1000
    >
    > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq ftp
    > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq ftp-data
    > access-list 102 permit tcp any eq ftp any
    > access-list 102 permit tcp any eq ftp-data any
    Make, Oct 7, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Hypno999

    Hypno999 Guest

    I get hits on access lists but the traffic-shaping shows as inactive:

    Acc. Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes
    Shaping
    I/F List Depth Delayed Delayed
    Active
    Se0/0 101 0 3 140 0 0
    no
    Se0/0 102 0 0 0 0 0
    no
    Hypno999, Oct 7, 2005
    #3
  4. Hypno999

    Hypno999 Guest

    I get hits on access lists but the traffic-shaping shows as inactive:

    Acc. Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes
    Shaping
    I/F List Depth Delayed Delayed
    Active
    Se0/0 101 0 3 140 0 0
    no
    Se0/0 102 0 0 0 0 0
    no
    Hypno999, Oct 7, 2005
    #4
  5. Hypno999

    Igor Mamuzic Guest

    If your ACL is ok then I think that your shaped traffic transmission does
    not achieve 400000 bps at all....(and you defined a large bursts, lower the
    bursts to lowest possible value). For the test: try to shape on 200000
    (again lower the bursts lowest you can) and then see whether TS is active or
    not... Let me know....

    B.R.
    Igor




    "Hypno999" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > I'm trying to limit the ftp traffic on 512 frame link to 400000 bits,
    > so there is still some space left for telnet, http, etc.
    >
    > This is what I've setup so far but no luck:
    >
    > interface Serial0/0
    > traffic-shape group 101 400000 400000 400000 1000
    > traffic-shape group 102 400000 400000 400000 1000
    >
    > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq ftp
    > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq ftp-data
    > access-list 102 permit tcp any eq ftp any
    > access-list 102 permit tcp any eq ftp-data any
    >
    > any ideas? THanks, Tom.
    >
    Igor Mamuzic, Oct 7, 2005
    #5
  6. Hypno999

    Make Guest

    Its only active when there is ftp traffic over 400k.
    Try traffic-shape group 101 50000.


    >I get hits on access lists but the traffic-shaping shows as inactive:
    >
    > Acc. Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes
    > Shaping
    > I/F List Depth Delayed Delayed
    > Active
    > Se0/0 101 0 3 140 0 0
    > no
    > Se0/0 102 0 0 0 0 0
    > no
    >
    Make, Oct 8, 2005
    #6
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Kenny D
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    646
    Remien, Carsten
    Dec 5, 2003
  2. Skybuck Flying
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    4,834
    Skybuck Flying
    Jan 19, 2006
  3. Helge Olav Helgesen

    Rate limit or traffic shaping

    Helge Olav Helgesen, Nov 27, 2006, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    395
    Helge Olav Helgesen
    Nov 27, 2006
  4. Nova
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    947
    ~misfit~
    Mar 20, 2006
  5. Replies:
    1
    Views:
    676
    Ios2012
    Oct 4, 2011
Loading...

Share This Page