Tired of Cisco IPSec bugs...Is Juniper any better?

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Hansang Bae, Feb 13, 2004.

  1. Hansang Bae

    Hansang Bae Guest

    Is the grass really greener on the other side?

    Has anyone here used Juniper (M class) with the VPN module? I'd like to
    hear some real world stories from people with Juniper experience.
    Things like how it fails over, real world throughput etc.

    Basically, it has to support one or two OC3's with IPSec enabled. The
    other side of the OC3s will be branch routers with T1s (3600's, 2600s,
    3700s)

    Currently, we use 7200VXRs with ISA and VAM cards. Can't use VAM-II's
    since the IOS code required is not our standard....nor does is support
    RSA Encryption as far as I know. Afterall, Cisco had to write in
    support for RSA Encr (VAM) for us in the train we're on.

    Also, due to BW point limitations as well as weak IPSec throughput, we
    can't even load it up with HSSI cards.

    We will evaluate 6500 VPN appliance boxes, but I might as well as try
    out Juniper.

    Thanks


    --

    hsb

    "Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding" Calvin
    *************** USE ROT13 TO SEE MY EMAIL ADDRESS ****************
    ********************************************************************
    Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not not be able to
    reply to emails sent to my account. Please post a followup instead.
    ********************************************************************
    Hansang Bae, Feb 13, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Hansang Bae

    Ivan Ostres Guest

    In article <>,
    says...
    > We will evaluate 6500 VPN appliance boxes, but I might as well as try
    > out Juniper.
    >


    We're having more or less the same kind of trouble. Could you share the
    results with the rest of us?


    --
    Ivan
    Ivan Ostres, Feb 13, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Hansang Bae

    Hansang Bae Guest

    > In article <>,
    > says...
    > > We will evaluate 6500 VPN appliance boxes, but I might as well as try
    > > out Juniper.


    In article <c0hur6$181bie$-berlin.de>,
    says...
    > We're having more or less the same kind of trouble. Could you share the
    > results with the rest of us?



    Juniper eval or the 6500 VPN eval? (or both?)


    --

    hsb

    "Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding" Calvin
    *************** USE ROT13 TO SEE MY EMAIL ADDRESS ****************
    ********************************************************************
    Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not not be able to
    reply to emails sent to my account. Please post a followup instead.
    ********************************************************************
    Hansang Bae, Feb 14, 2004
    #3
  4. Hansang Bae

    Rob Guest

    What bugs??



    On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 05:26:47 GMT, Hansang Bae <> wrote:

    >> In article <>,
    >> says...
    >> > We will evaluate 6500 VPN appliance boxes, but I might as well as try
    >> > out Juniper.

    >
    >In article <c0hur6$181bie$-berlin.de>,
    > says...
    >> We're having more or less the same kind of trouble. Could you share the
    >> results with the rest of us?

    >
    >
    >Juniper eval or the 6500 VPN eval? (or both?)
    Rob, Feb 14, 2004
    #4
  5. Hansang Bae

    Ivan Ostres Guest

    In article <>,
    says...
    > > In article <>,
    > > says...
    > > > We will evaluate 6500 VPN appliance boxes, but I might as well as try
    > > > out Juniper.

    >
    > In article <c0hur6$181bie$-berlin.de>,
    > says...
    > > We're having more or less the same kind of trouble. Could you share the
    > > results with the rest of us?

    >
    >
    > Juniper eval or the 6500 VPN eval? (or both?)
    >


    Both.


    --
    Ivan
    Ivan Ostres, Feb 16, 2004
    #5
  6. Hansang Bae

    Hansang Bae Guest

    Rob <> wrote in message news:<>...
    > What bugs??


    For starters....

    CSCdy41412
    CSCed51546
    CSCed62129
    CSCed13108

    And we have one more to add (router goes bye-bye) but no clue as to
    what's causing it yet. Our account team tells us it's been escalated
    as far as possible within Cisco.

    Hansang
    Hansang Bae, Feb 18, 2004
    #6
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Hansang Bae
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    413
    Hansang Bae
    Feb 13, 2004
  2. Debra Rosiu

    Tired of being tired??

    Debra Rosiu, Sep 22, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    443
    Tina - AffordableHOST.com
    Sep 22, 2003
  3. Jason

    Bugs and Bugs...get rid of them

    Jason, Jan 31, 2006, in forum: Computer Security
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    466
    Hellish
    Jan 31, 2006
  4. Networking Student
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    1,251
    vreyesii
    Nov 16, 2006
  5. networkuserjedi
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    645
    networkuserjedi
    Jan 5, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page