Steve's review of the Nikon D50

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by deryck lant, Aug 6, 2005.

  1. deryck  lant

    deryck lant Guest

    deryck lant, Aug 6, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. deryck lant wrote:
    > http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/nikon_d50.html
    >
    > There are comparison test shots with the Canon 350D.
    >
    > So now you can argue to your hearts content.
    >

    Too late! Arguments are down the hall, and have been concluded.

    But there's much to re-argue!

    Thanks for the setup.

    --
    John McWilliams
     
    John McWilliams, Aug 6, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. deryck  lant

    Brian Baird Guest

    Brian Baird, Aug 6, 2005
    #3
  4. deryck  lant

    Brian Baird Guest

    In article <>,
    says...
    > http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/nikon_d50.html
    >
    > There are comparison test shots with the Canon 350D.
    >
    > So now you can argue to your hearts content.
    >
    > Deryck


    It's times like this I love having two monitors.

    Anyhoo, the D50 with the Nikon 18-55mm lens seems to exhibit some CA
    towards the edge of the frame in a couple of shots that the 350D/XT
    doesn't. The 350D/XT certainly benefits from the extra two megapixels.

    That said, I can't see anyone being disappointed in the D50. For its
    price and market it gives good results.
    --
    http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird
     
    Brian Baird, Aug 6, 2005
    #4
  5. deryck  lant

    Mike Engles Guest

    Brian Baird wrote:
    >
    > In article <>,
    > says...
    > > http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/nikon_d50.html
    > >
    > > There are comparison test shots with the Canon 350D.
    > >
    > > So now you can argue to your hearts content.
    > >
    > > Deryck

    >
    > It's times like this I love having two monitors.
    >
    > Anyhoo, the D50 with the Nikon 18-55mm lens seems to exhibit some CA
    > towards the edge of the frame in a couple of shots that the 350D/XT
    > doesn't. The 350D/XT certainly benefits from the extra two megapixels.
    >
    > That said, I can't see anyone being disappointed in the D50. For its
    > price and market it gives good results.
    > --
    > http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird

    Hello

    Actually they both show similar amounts of CA, especially noticable in
    the two parallel cables in the top left. The Nikon looks very sharp, but
    has considerable haloing.

    Mike Engles
     
    Mike Engles, Aug 6, 2005
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Mikey
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    3,615
    Tonester
    Sep 14, 2006
  2. deryck  lant

    Nikon D50 Full Review

    deryck lant, Jul 23, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    13
    Views:
    493
    SimonLW
    Jul 25, 2005
  3. deryck  lant

    Nikon D50: In-depth Technical Review

    deryck lant, Aug 14, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    340
    deryck lant
    Aug 14, 2005
  4. deryck  lant

    Nikon D80 review: Steve's Digicams

    deryck lant, Oct 28, 2006, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    362
    deryck lant
    Oct 28, 2006
  5. dslr_shooter
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    698
Loading...

Share This Page