solaris 10 and windows x64 dual boot redux

Discussion in 'Windows 64bit' started by woland, Mar 7, 2006.

  1. woland

    woland Guest

    A question regarding previous posts on this, and sorry if I missed
    anything: would it be better to use the windows x64 boot manager or
    grubs(?) that comes with Solaris 10, when dual booting these two
    systems?

    I've dual booted linux and win before, but I've never done it with
    solaris, and this will be the first go with solaris for me. I hate
    messing up my MBR, which I've done before with LILO (I'm not sure
    exactly what I did to achieve this). So, any help is welcome.

    woland
     
    woland, Mar 7, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. You don't have a choice. The MS boot manager will not let you choose
    anything but MS OS types. You can use a third party boot manager if you wish
    (I usually do on machines I boot across to both UNIX and Windows) or you can
    install Windows, then install Solaris. I like to create my partitions
    first - creating multiple primary partitions and leaving the first one for
    UNIX (some of them didn't like not being in the first 1024 cylinders, at
    least in the old days), and then installing Windows onto the second one.
    This requires partitioning software that allows you to create multiple
    primary partitions. Another way around this is a bios that allows you to
    change the order of hard drives. IAC, Solaris should have a way to boot over
    to Windows, though I don't have any familiarity with it, I confess.

    --
    Charlie.
    http://msmvps.com/xperts64

    woland wrote:
    > A question regarding previous posts on this, and sorry if I missed
    > anything: would it be better to use the windows x64 boot manager or
    > grubs(?) that comes with Solaris 10, when dual booting these two
    > systems?
    >
    > I've dual booted linux and win before, but I've never done it with
    > solaris, and this will be the first go with solaris for me. I hate
    > messing up my MBR, which I've done before with LILO (I'm not sure
    > exactly what I did to achieve this). So, any help is welcome.
    >
    > woland
     
    Charlie Russel - MVP, Mar 7, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. This might be useful for some possibilities:
    http://michael.gasperi.priv.at/documents/solaris-9-dual-boot-with-windows-xp

    Tom
    MSMVP
    Windows Shell/User


    "woland" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    |A question regarding previous posts on this, and sorry if I missed
    | anything: would it be better to use the windows x64 boot manager or
    | grubs(?) that comes with Solaris 10, when dual booting these two
    | systems?
    |
    | I've dual booted linux and win before, but I've never done it with
    | solaris, and this will be the first go with solaris for me. I hate
    | messing up my MBR, which I've done before with LILO (I'm not sure
    | exactly what I did to achieve this). So, any help is welcome.
    |
    | woland
    |
     
    Thomas Ferguson, Mar 7, 2006
    #3
  4. We are all limited by what we like, once the only other loader I knew about
    was LILO - now, there seem to be wide concent that GRUB is a more modern
    job. If you find that is the way to go - here is where you can get the GRUB
    manual (some 85 pages of all the gory details in PDF). Should keep you on
    the 'straight and narrow'.


    Tony. . .


    "woland" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >A question regarding previous posts on this, and sorry if I missed
    > anything: would it be better to use the windows x64 boot manager or
    > grubs(?) that comes with Solaris 10, when dual booting these two
    > systems?
    >
    > I've dual booted linux and win before, but I've never done it with
    > solaris, and this will be the first go with solaris for me. I hate
    > messing up my MBR, which I've done before with LILO (I'm not sure
    > exactly what I did to achieve this). So, any help is welcome.
    >
    > woland
    >
     
    Tony Sperling, Mar 7, 2006
    #4
  5. Sorry - forgot to paste!

    http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.pdf


    Tony. . .


    "Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > We are all limited by what we like, once the only other loader I knew
    > about was LILO - now, there seem to be wide concent that GRUB is a more
    > modern job. If you find that is the way to go - here is where you can get
    > the GRUB manual (some 85 pages of all the gory details in PDF). Should
    > keep you on the 'straight and narrow'.
    >
    >
    > Tony. . .
    >
    >
    > "woland" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    >>A question regarding previous posts on this, and sorry if I missed
    >> anything: would it be better to use the windows x64 boot manager or
    >> grubs(?) that comes with Solaris 10, when dual booting these two
    >> systems?
    >>
    >> I've dual booted linux and win before, but I've never done it with
    >> solaris, and this will be the first go with solaris for me. I hate
    >> messing up my MBR, which I've done before with LILO (I'm not sure
    >> exactly what I did to achieve this). So, any help is welcome.
    >>
    >> woland
    >>

    >
    >
     
    Tony Sperling, Mar 7, 2006
    #5
  6. woland

    jacob navia Guest

    woland a écrit :
    > A question regarding previous posts on this, and sorry if I missed
    > anything: would it be better to use the windows x64 boot manager or
    > grubs(?) that comes with Solaris 10, when dual booting these two
    > systems?
    >
    > I've dual booted linux and win before, but I've never done it with
    > solaris, and this will be the first go with solaris for me. I hate
    > messing up my MBR, which I've done before with LILO (I'm not sure
    > exactly what I did to achieve this). So, any help is welcome.
    >
    > woland
    >


    I have windows server 64 bits coexisting peacefully with linux
    mandrake 64 bits, windows server 2003 (32 bits) windows xp (32 bits)
    and some others

    The BEST solution I have found so far is having each OS in a separate
    disk, and having the boot menu letting me choose which OS I want
    to drive by choosing the boot disk.

    I leave the default OS in the IDE1 disk, that boots windows 2003 64 bits.
    When I need linux for some customer request I press F11 at boot and
    I boot from lilo in the second SATA disk, that allows me to boot
    either Mandrake or Debian linux. Note that lilo allows you to boot
    from the SATA disk, but windows doesn't, so it is a good idea to
    use SATA for linux systems, and leave the IDE disks for windows.

    The second IDE disk contains windows server 32 bits, and windows
    xp 32 bits. When I boot this disk I arrive into a secondary boot
    menu.

    Each OS thinks it is the only one. No problems at all. The only
    time I lost an OS was when I tried to install windows VISTA that
    destroyed my windows XP (32) system and the boot loader in the drive.
    The other OSses were not affected.

    jacob

    P.S. Something unrelated: Linux sees NTFS partitions and can read them.
    It would be nice if Windows could read linux partitions. Someone here
    knows about an EXT3 file system support for Windows?
     
    jacob navia, Mar 7, 2006
    #6
  7. Yes, I've seen it - I think it was on PAMD64. . .


    Tony. . .


    "jacob navia" <> wrote in message
    news:uR%...
    > woland a écrit :
    > > A question regarding previous posts on this, and sorry if I missed
    > > anything: would it be better to use the windows x64 boot manager or
    > > grubs(?) that comes with Solaris 10, when dual booting these two
    > > systems?
    > >
    > > I've dual booted linux and win before, but I've never done it with
    > > solaris, and this will be the first go with solaris for me. I hate
    > > messing up my MBR, which I've done before with LILO (I'm not sure
    > > exactly what I did to achieve this). So, any help is welcome.
    > >
    > > woland
    > >

    >
    > I have windows server 64 bits coexisting peacefully with linux
    > mandrake 64 bits, windows server 2003 (32 bits) windows xp (32 bits)
    > and some others
    >
    > The BEST solution I have found so far is having each OS in a separate
    > disk, and having the boot menu letting me choose which OS I want
    > to drive by choosing the boot disk.
    >
    > I leave the default OS in the IDE1 disk, that boots windows 2003 64 bits.
    > When I need linux for some customer request I press F11 at boot and
    > I boot from lilo in the second SATA disk, that allows me to boot
    > either Mandrake or Debian linux. Note that lilo allows you to boot
    > from the SATA disk, but windows doesn't, so it is a good idea to
    > use SATA for linux systems, and leave the IDE disks for windows.
    >
    > The second IDE disk contains windows server 32 bits, and windows
    > xp 32 bits. When I boot this disk I arrive into a secondary boot
    > menu.
    >
    > Each OS thinks it is the only one. No problems at all. The only
    > time I lost an OS was when I tried to install windows VISTA that
    > destroyed my windows XP (32) system and the boot loader in the drive.
    > The other OSses were not affected.
    >
    > jacob
    >
    > P.S. Something unrelated: Linux sees NTFS partitions and can read them.
    > It would be nice if Windows could read linux partitions. Someone here
    > knows about an EXT3 file system support for Windows?
     
    Tony Sperling, Mar 7, 2006
    #7
  8. woland

    VWWall Guest

    woland wrote:
    > A question regarding previous posts on this, and sorry if I missed
    > anything: would it be better to use the windows x64 boot manager or
    > grubs(?) that comes with Solaris 10, when dual booting these two
    > systems?


    If you let GRUB install on the x64 system partition MBR, it will offer a
    choice of "Windows" on boot-up. This will take you to the Win x64
    boot.ini which can offer other Windows dual boot options. I've edited
    the GRUB "menu.1st" to make Windows the default with a 5 second delay.
    boot.ini is edited to go to WinXP32 as default, and WinXP x64 a choice.

    If you install Windows after Linux, it will re-write the MBR and ignore
    GRUB. Most Linux distros have a "boot repair" to fix this
    >
    > I've dual booted linux and win before, but I've never done it with
    > solaris, and this will be the first go with solaris for me. I hate
    > messing up my MBR, which I've done before with LILO (I'm not sure
    > exactly what I did to achieve this). So, any help is welcome.


    FIXMBR from the Win CD will "un-mess" the MBR, but will also "un-seat"
    GRUB! A sure way to avoid all this is to make a floppy boot-loader to
    start Solaris.

    --
    Virg Wall, P.E.
     
    VWWall, Mar 7, 2006
    #8
  9. woland

    woland Guest

    Thank you all for all your help. This was very helpful. Since I
    already have Win x64 installed, I'll try letting Grub install on the
    x64 partition. I'm going to have a separate hard drive for Solaris 10.

    I forgot to mention this, but does having two SATA hard drives make a
    difference in any of your suggestions? That's what I'm going to do,
    have win x64 on one SATA drive and Solaris 10 on another SATA. If it
    doesn't make a difference, then I guess I'll know.

    Again, thank you everyone for your posts.

    woland
     
    woland, Mar 8, 2006
    #9
  10. Your only worry is if Solaris needs driver support to see the SATA. I'm
    affraid I cannot be of much assistance on that matter. Personally, I wanted
    to have 64bit SUSE on my other SATA, but the only driver I could find was
    source, so I would need to compile to install, and I cannot compile until I
    have installed. (sic!) Instead I set up a RAID 0 for my winx64, certainly
    not the same thing, but I am fairly happy.

    Tony. . .


    "woland" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Thank you all for all your help. This was very helpful. Since I
    > already have Win x64 installed, I'll try letting Grub install on the
    > x64 partition. I'm going to have a separate hard drive for Solaris 10.
    >
    > I forgot to mention this, but does having two SATA hard drives make a
    > difference in any of your suggestions? That's what I'm going to do,
    > have win x64 on one SATA drive and Solaris 10 on another SATA. If it
    > doesn't make a difference, then I guess I'll know.
    >
    > Again, thank you everyone for your posts.
    >
    > woland
    >
     
    Tony Sperling, Mar 8, 2006
    #10
  11. woland

    Randy Guest

    Care to summarize your impressions of Solaris 10, especially versus 64bit
    Windows (if you've been able to use solaris yet)? I've been toying with the
    idea of multi-booting a test system to Solaris as well, but only have an
    older 32bit version (8), so not worth installing on my 64bit system...

    "woland" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Thank you all for all your help. This was very helpful. Since I
    > already have Win x64 installed, I'll try letting Grub install on the
    > x64 partition. I'm going to have a separate hard drive for Solaris 10.
    >
    > I forgot to mention this, but does having two SATA hard drives make a
    > difference in any of your suggestions? That's what I'm going to do,
    > have win x64 on one SATA drive and Solaris 10 on another SATA. If it
    > doesn't make a difference, then I guess I'll know.
    >
    > Again, thank you everyone for your posts.
    >
    > woland
    >
     
    Randy, Mar 8, 2006
    #11
  12. woland

    woland Guest

    I'm still waiting for my hard drive to come, so I haven't installed it
    yet.

    Solaris 10 is a free download and is 64 bit. You can download it at
    www.sun.com, just follow the links for Solaris 10.

    woland
    Randy wrote:
    > Care to summarize your impressions of Solaris 10, especially versus 64bit
    > Windows (if you've been able to use solaris yet)? I've been toying with the
    > idea of multi-booting a test system to Solaris as well, but only have an
    > older 32bit version (8), so not worth installing on my 64bit system...
    >
    > "woland" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > Thank you all for all your help. This was very helpful. Since I
    > > already have Win x64 installed, I'll try letting Grub install on the
    > > x64 partition. I'm going to have a separate hard drive for Solaris 10.
    > >
    > > I forgot to mention this, but does having two SATA hard drives make a
    > > difference in any of your suggestions? That's what I'm going to do,
    > > have win x64 on one SATA drive and Solaris 10 on another SATA. If it
    > > doesn't make a difference, then I guess I'll know.
    > >
    > > Again, thank you everyone for your posts.
    > >
    > > woland
    > >
     
    woland, Mar 8, 2006
    #12
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. =?Utf-8?B?dGNoYW5uYQ==?=

    Solaris 10 and x64 dual boot setup

    =?Utf-8?B?dGNoYW5uYQ==?=, Sep 7, 2005, in forum: Windows 64bit
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    470
    NoNoBadDog!
    Sep 7, 2005
  2. =?Utf-8?B?Z25zdXJlc2g=?=

    Dual Boot for Windows 2000 server and Windows XP x64

    =?Utf-8?B?Z25zdXJlc2g=?=, Dec 5, 2005, in forum: Windows 64bit
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    516
    John Barnes
    Dec 5, 2005
  3. Dual Boot XP and Solaris

    , Sep 18, 2009, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    18
    Views:
    780
    Richard
    Sep 25, 2009
  4. Hugh Sutherland

    dual boot or not to dual boot

    Hugh Sutherland, Jan 20, 2010, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    688
    Mike Easter
    Jan 20, 2010
  5. Hugh Sutherland

    to dual boot or not to dual boot

    Hugh Sutherland, Jan 20, 2010, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    477
    thanatoid
    Jan 21, 2010
Loading...

Share This Page