SIP with Siemens HiPath 2000

Discussion in 'UK VOIP' started by alexd, Aug 20, 2007.

  1. alexd

    alexd Guest

    Anyone had any experience with the above?
    I've tried an Atcom AT-320, X-lite, a Fujitsu FDX-840 and a Mitel 5220
    handset, and none of them will register to the PBX if password
    authentication is enabled. If I disable password authentication, the
    extensions register and can make and receive calls fine [although the Atcom
    wouldn't register at all unless I set the registration timeout to be
    exactly the same as what the HiPath wanted].

    Also, has anyone managed to get a HiPath<->Asterisk SIP trunk working? My
    best efforts have resulted in '603 Decline':

    <-- SIP read from 192.168.13.2:5060:
    SIP/2.0 100 Trying
    Call-ID: 5080936e49400afb72fb3ba86aa5e966@192.168.3.119
    CSeq: 102 INVITE
    From: "Alex D" <sip:2001@192.168.3.119>;tag=as1b2bc26e
    To: <sip:15@192.168.13.2>;tag=9495b74cdee172b
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.119:5060;branch=z9hG4bK75cf93c4;rport
    Content-Length: 0
    User-Agent: HiPath 2000 V1.0 M5T SIP-UA SAFE/v3.6.5.9


    --- (8 headers 0 lines) ---
    asterisk1*CLI>
    <-- SIP read from 192.168.13.2:5060:
    SIP/2.0 603 Decline
    Call-ID: 5080936e49400afb72fb3ba86aa5e966@192.168.3.119
    CSeq: 102 INVITE
    From: "Alex D" <sip:2001@192.168.3.119>;tag=as1b2bc26e
    To: <sip:15@192.168.13.2>;tag=9495b74cdee172b
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.119:5060;branch=z9hG4bK75cf93c4;rport
    Content-Length: 0
    Reason:Q.850; cause=0; text=""
    User-Agent: HiPath 2000 V1.0 M5T SIP-UA SAFE/v3.6.5.9


    --- (9 headers 0 lines) ---
    -- Got SIP response 603 "Decline" back from 192.168.13.2
    Transmitting (NAT) to 192.168.13.2:5060:
    ACK sip:15@192.168.13.2 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.119:5060;branch=z9hG4bK75cf93c4;rport
    From: "Alex D" <sip:2001@192.168.3.119>;tag=as1b2bc26e
    To: <sip:15@192.168.13.2>;tag=9495b74cdee172b
    Contact: <sip:2001@192.168.3.119>
    Call-ID: 5080936e49400afb72fb3ba86aa5e966@192.168.3.119
    CSeq: 102 ACK
    User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
    Max-Forwards: 70
    Content-Length: 0


    --
    <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ()
    13:04:01 up 33 days, 18:49, 3 users, load average: 0.26, 0.57, 0.81
    09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0
     
    alexd, Aug 20, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. alexd

    Tim Guest

    alexd wrote:
    > Anyone had any experience with the above?
    > I've tried an Atcom AT-320, X-lite, a Fujitsu FDX-840 and a Mitel 5220
    > handset, and none of them will register to the PBX if password
    > authentication is enabled. If I disable password authentication, the
    > extensions register and can make and receive calls fine [although the Atcom
    > wouldn't register at all unless I set the registration timeout to be
    > exactly the same as what the HiPath wanted].


    I don't the 2000 is really designed to support SIP handsets. Only the
    8000 does.



    Tim
     
    Tim, Aug 20, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. alexd

    alexd Guest

    Tim wrote:

    > alexd wrote:
    >> Anyone had any experience with the above?
    >> I've tried an Atcom AT-320, X-lite, a Fujitsu FDX-840 and a Mitel 5220
    >> handset, and none of them will register to the PBX if password
    >> authentication is enabled. If I disable password authentication, the
    >> extensions register and can make and receive calls fine [although the
    >> Atcom wouldn't register at all unless I set the registration timeout to
    >> be exactly the same as what the HiPath wanted].

    >
    > I don't the 2000 is really designed to support SIP handsets.


    FSVO 'support'. That probably explains why I couldn't find a way to create
    SIP extensions through the web interface, then. I had to use Manager-E, and
    then use the web interface to configure them. I did think it was a
    particularly obtuse way of doing things. However, once done, they work just
    fine.

    --
    <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ()
    21:04:32 up 34 days, 2:49, 3 users, load average: 3.96, 2.96, 1.85
    09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0
     
    alexd, Aug 20, 2007
    #3
  4. alexd

    Tim Guest

    alexd wrote:
    > FSVO 'support'. That probably explains why I couldn't find a way to create
    > SIP extensions through the web interface, then. I had to use Manager-E, and
    > then use the web interface to configure them. I did think it was a
    > particularly obtuse way of doing things. However, once done, they work just
    > fine.


    But with no authentication support?

    Tim
     
    Tim, Aug 20, 2007
    #4
  5. alexd

    alexd Guest

    Tim wrote:

    > alexd wrote:
    >> FSVO 'support'. That probably explains why I couldn't find a way to
    >> create SIP extensions through the web interface, then. I had to use
    >> Manager-E, and then use the web interface to configure them. I did think
    >> it was a particularly obtuse way of doing things. However, once done,
    >> they work just fine.

    >
    > But with no authentication support?


    Correct. It must be trying to use some oddball auth scheme or something.
    Just install asterisk on it if you want authentication - any idea what the
    root password is? ;-)

    --
    <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ()
    10:09:40 up 34 days, 15:55, 3 users, load average: 1.17, 1.21, 1.29
    09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0
     
    alexd, Aug 21, 2007
    #5
  6. alexd

    Tim Guest

    alexd wrote:
    > Correct. It must be trying to use some oddball auth scheme or something.
    > Just install asterisk on it if you want authentication - any idea what the
    > root password is? ;-)
    >


    The bit of Siemens I deal with is a different department to HiPath.

    I'm wondering if a C460IP will authenticate.

    Tim
     
    Tim, Aug 21, 2007
    #6
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Georgi Sinapov

    HiPath 3570 and Cisco 1760 via ISDN BRI

    Georgi Sinapov, May 14, 2004, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,844
    punyot
    May 17, 2008
  2. Guest
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    814
    Guest
    Jul 4, 2005
  3. Sandeep Bharihoke
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    3,062
    Sandeep Bharihoke
    Sep 25, 2003
  4. Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,776
    Soren Rathje
    Apr 3, 2005
  5. cawan2000
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    864
    cawan2000
    Jan 23, 2010
Loading...

Share This Page