sec@phazen.net message

Discussion in 'NZ Computing' started by Geopelia, Apr 3, 2007.

  1. Geopelia

    Geopelia Guest

    I suppose this is just another bit of virus spam?
    I'm not opening the attachment.

    Geopelia
     
    Geopelia, Apr 3, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. In article <eutd0o$ln6$>, "Geopelia" <> wrote:
    >I suppose this is just another bit of virus spam?
    >I'm not opening the attachment.


    If you have to ask, you already know the answer :)
     
    Bruce Sinclair, Apr 4, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Geopelia

    Geopelia Guest

    "Bruce Sinclair" <> wrote
    in message news:euuqa2$m96$...
    > In article <eutd0o$ln6$>, "Geopelia" <>
    > wrote:
    >>I suppose this is just another bit of virus spam?
    >>I'm not opening the attachment.

    >
    > If you have to ask, you already know the answer :)


    I had my suspicions, but thought I'd better check. Thanks.
    Geopelia
     
    Geopelia, Apr 5, 2007
    #3
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Clemens Schwaighofer

    No PAT from Higher Sec to Lower Sec interface

    Clemens Schwaighofer, Oct 20, 2005, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    500
    Clemens Schwaighofer
    Oct 20, 2005
  2. =?Utf-8?B?QW1hbiBCLg==?=

    Upgrade path: MCSA2000:Sec -> MCSA2003 -> MCSE2003:Sec ?

    =?Utf-8?B?QW1hbiBCLg==?=, Sep 7, 2005, in forum: MCSE
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    888
  3. Bob Christian
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    490
    =?Utf-8?B?QW1hbiBCLg==?=
    Dec 13, 2005
  4. The Rev [MCT]
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    443
    The Rev [MCT]
    Dec 13, 2005
  5. =?Utf-8?B?QW1hbiBCLg==?=
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    434
    =?Utf-8?B?QW1hbiBCLg==?=
    Dec 13, 2005
Loading...

Share This Page