RTP Header Compression: How does it effect flow through network?

Discussion in 'VOIP' started by CCGolfer, Jun 8, 2004.

  1. CCGolfer

    CCGolfer Guest

    It seems that RTP header compression would be a good idea, but as the
    packets flow through the network they need to be uncompressed at each
    hop don't they? What's the trade-off in todays routing equipment for
    handling RTP header compressed packets vs. the bandwidth that they
    save?

    Thanks,

    Greg in MA
     
    CCGolfer, Jun 8, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. CCGolfer

    shope Guest

    "CCGolfer" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > It seems that RTP header compression would be a good idea, but as the
    > packets flow through the network they need to be uncompressed at each
    > hop don't they? What's the trade-off in todays routing equipment for
    > handling RTP header compressed packets vs. the bandwidth that they
    > save?


    it depends. (stock answer - sorry)

    1st - a lot of soho type routers dont seem to do this anyway. You need to
    support compression at both ends of the link, (or VPN tunnel).
    2nd - devices that do support (eg cisco), tend to run compression in
    software for this - hit on the router CPU depends on router, line speed, and
    the amount of voice traffic.
    3rd - the "choke point" is often a router at a aggregation point - eg a
    frame relay site where lots of PVCs terminate - you need to check processor
    load at each RTP compression point.
    4th - you need to be careful about interactions between compression, QoS and
    call admission control. Basically, the router may not look at compressed
    data to calculate QoS thresholds, so you may end up deliberately
    misconfiguring things to compensate (e.g. with RSVP) - which is great until
    someone alters the config and "corrects" the mistake.

    since you can get compression in hardware as an option in many routers (and
    you may have to use that in an aggregation router to get enough compression
    without CPU overload), it may make more sense to compress everything - that
    way you gain on data traffic as well.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Greg in MA

    --
    Regards

    Stephen Hope - return address needs fewer xxs
     
    shope, Jun 10, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. love0503hk
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    583
    love0503hk
    Jan 25, 2004
  2. BruceatATX

    Problems with RTP Header Compression

    BruceatATX, Sep 15, 2005, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    1,873
    www.networking-forum.com
    Sep 16, 2005
  3. CCGolfer
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    3,976
    CCGolfer
    Jun 8, 2004
  4. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    567
  5. v

    RTP packet flow

    v, Aug 6, 2006, in forum: VOIP
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,420
    Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
    Aug 7, 2006
Loading...

Share This Page