rebel 300d iso 100 vs nikon d70 iso 200

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by cohibakid, Jul 14, 2004.

  1. cohibakid

    cohibakid Guest

    I am just wonder if there is a lot of image quality difference between
    the two cameras at these settings?
    thanks
    Cohibakid
    cohibakid, Jul 14, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. cohibakid

    Matthias Guest

    (cohibakid) writes:
    > I am just wonder if there is a lot of image quality difference between
    > the two cameras at these settings?
    > thanks
    > Cohibakid


    The difference would be in the noise. On the bottom of
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond70/page14.asp
    there's a graph comparing noise levels.

    The difference between Rebel 100 and D70 200 is slightly smaller than
    between D70 200 and D70 800. However, I've no idea how the axes are
    scaled and what they actually measure.

    Matthias
    Matthias, Jul 14, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. see the above post

    it seems one supports and respects its customers far better than the other

    Artie

    "cohibakid" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > I am just wonder if there is a lot of image quality difference between
    > the two cameras at these settings?
    > thanks
    > Cohibakid
    Arte Phacting, Jul 14, 2004
    #3
  4. cohibakid

    Tom Scales Guest

    Pretty biased thread, don't you think?

    D70 is a better camera than the 300d. Hands down.

    That said, they're both fine cameras.

    Tom
    "Arte Phacting" <> wrote in message
    news:ZUhJc.939$...
    > see the above post
    >
    > it seems one supports and respects its customers far better than the other
    >
    > Artie
    >
    > "cohibakid" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > I am just wonder if there is a lot of image quality difference between
    > > the two cameras at these settings?
    > > thanks
    > > Cohibakid

    >
    >
    Tom Scales, Jul 15, 2004
    #4
  5. "Tom Scales" <> wrote:
    >
    > D70 is a better camera than the 300d. Hands down.


    In features, it kicks the 300D's butt. All the way across the playground and
    out into the street. Splat! But it doesn't have the seriously low-noise ISO
    100 the 300D does, and the weaker AA filter means that in exchange for
    apparently sharper images you occassionally see some really ugly Moire. Very
    occasionaly, I realize.

    > That said, they're both fine cameras.


    They're both flipping amazing cameras. My preference is for the 300D. But
    the D70 features make it better for anyone who can use said features,
    especially the much faster burst and continuous shooting rates. The D70 has
    a nore useful kit lens as well.

    David J. Littleboy
    Tokyo, Japan
    David J. Littleboy, Jul 15, 2004
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Paolo Pizzi

    Nikon D70 samples (ISO 200 & 1000)

    Paolo Pizzi, Feb 11, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    15
    Views:
    812
    Mike Latondresse
    Feb 18, 2004
  2. Albert Voss

    Light tele for D70: Sigma 55-200 or Nikon 28-200?

    Albert Voss, Apr 9, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    2,643
    Paolo Pizzi
    Apr 11, 2004
  3. J. Cod
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    408
    J. Cod
    Sep 29, 2004
  4. Replies:
    10
    Views:
    892
    Joseph Miller
    Jun 7, 2005
  5. Larry R Harrison Jr

    D70 ISO 200 Noise vs EOS 300D ISO 100

    Larry R Harrison Jr, Jul 17, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    406
Loading...

Share This Page