Re: Whitley Strieber's New Breakthrough

Discussion in 'Computer Support' started by Baron Maximillian von Schtuldeworfshiseundurheimh, Oct 19, 2003.

  1. Geoff Blackmore wrote:
    > A Personal Breakthrough: A Huge Question Answered
    > Thursday October 16th, 2003
    > By Whitley Strieber
    > http://www.unknowncountry.com/journal/
    >
    > Ever since I realized that something strange had happened to me on
    > December 26, 1985, I have held the question open of what that might
    > have been. In Communion, I was careful to preserve this question
    > throughout the book, and I have always stayed loyal to this question,
    > no matter how much pressure I have been under to resolve it in one
    > way or another.
    >
    > However, I have also always believed that it is essential not to
    > cling to questions after they have been answered, and this one has
    > been answered. I know what happened to me on that night, and I know,
    > if not who did it, then certainly who did not. I also know that the
    > United States government is actively engaged in a process of
    > debunking the truth about the situation, and the ‘why’ of that.
    >
    > It has taken me nearly twenty years to reach these conclusions.
    > Oddly, the change in my position has not been a slow process but a
    > relatively quick one. Let me tell you how it came about.
    >
    > In 1989, I was in anguish. I knew that something truly extraordinary
    > was happening to me, and also that our degenerate culture was
    > laughing it off with rectal probe jokes. I am a very private man, and
    > on a personal, sexual level very conservative, and I found this not
    > only humiliating but depressing. It was depressing to see that the
    > amazingly rich and complex experience that I was having was being
    > rejected. But I also knew that there was no historical record of
    > anything similar. I had made a very special sort of a breakthrough
    > that could have been a rich source of new scientific knowledge, but
    > it was being treated as a joke.
    >
    > In those days, radio and television shows, eager to be as cruel to me
    > as possible for the entertainment of their audiences, used to try to
    > obtain copies of my second hypnosis tape. They wanted to get a laugh
    > out of a man describing how he had felt while being raped.
    >
    > I would sometimes send them copies, if they were especially vicious
    > in their threats of how they would treat me on the air if I didn’t,
    > but I would remove from the copies everything about the ‘rectal
    > probe.’
    >
    > Then I stopped altogether even taking calls from the media. I
    > confined my media appearances to book tours only. But then, as I was
    > publishing Confirmation, Parade Magazine suddenly published a false
    > article stating that I had admitted that I had temporal lobe epilepsy
    > and had become a celebrity supporter of the Epilepsy Foundation.
    >
    > This was completely false, literally made up out of whole cloth, and
    > I was able to force Parade to print a retraction as prominent as the
    > original article. The editor confidentially told me that the source
    > of the story had been Parade’s publisher. I soon discovered that he
    > was a prominent U.S. Air Force personality, a general in the
    > reserves, and an Air Force loyalist.
    >
    > I have always believed that this story was concocted as part of a
    > debunking effort being carried out by the Air Force. Also as part of
    > this effort, the U.S. intimidated agents, film studios and television
    > outlets into not doing anything with Communion, even though it was a
    > tremendous bestseller and would obviously make a highly successful
    > movie. As a result, no studio would touch the book, and the film was
    > made independently on a tiny budget and was hardly distributed at all.
    >
    > Finally, I quit writing about my experiences so that I wouldn’t have
    > to go on book tours. Art Bell took me in like a orphan in a storm,
    > giving me a frequent voice as a guest on Coast-to- Coast AM, and
    > eventually giving me Dreamland. So I still had an ability to tell
    > people what I was doing, but without exposing myself to the
    > humiliation, willful ignorance and rabid lying of the general media.
    >
    > Long before the publication of Confirmation, I had become unable to
    > listen to the second hypnosis tape. In fact, I lost it. All I had
    > were a couple of copies of the edited version. The last time I
    > listened to the whole tape was in late 1986, to transcribe it for
    > Communion. I all but sweated blood during that process.
    >
    > Until about two weeks ago, I thought that the tape was gone forever.
    > Then I had the experience that I described in my last journal entry,
    > “The Capture House.” The tape reappeared. It showed up in the drawer
    > of my bedside table. I am too careful to claim outright that it
    > hadn’t been there all along, because I cannot prove that, but
    > frankly, I have looked in that drawer hundreds of times in the years
    > it has been beside my bed, and I never saw the tape.
    >
    > A few days after I found the tape, I received an e-mail from a reader
    > of this website that proved to be of tremendous, even epochal,
    > importance in my life. The reader theorized that I had been the
    > victim of something called electroejaculation. This involves the
    > insertion of a probe into the rectum, and the application of an
    > electrical current that stimulates muscles to erect the penis and
    > cause an ejaculation. It is used in animal husbandry and in sex
    > clinics.
    >
    > I had never heard of such a thing, but a little research quickly
    > revealed that the machines exist and have been around for years. In
    > listening to the tape again, it became obvious that I was describing
    > being electroejaculated. First, I describe the insertion of the probe
    > into my body. A moment later, I express surprise that I have suddenly
    > gotten an erection, then react as I am aware of my ejaculation. I
    > remember one of the creatures who were doing this to me running off
    > with it in a little container.
    >
    > The innocent confusion on that tape is eloquent. I was being
    > subjected, back in December of 1986, to a clinical procedure that I
    > did not even known existed until October of 2003. My description of
    > what was happening to me is an exact description of the procedure.
    >
    > To me, this has closed the door on any possibility that what happened
    > to me that night was in any way imaginary or illusory. It was a real
    > event, and I do not believe that it was done by people in disguise,
    > but by nonhuman creatures of unknown origin. The reason that I am so
    > firm about this second part is that I believe not only my own eyes,
    > but the testimony of hundreds of thousands of people, and most
    > especially, the recent British Columbia abduction case of “Cynthia,”
    > which is the best documented case of this kind in history.
    >
    > Cynthia was not alone when she entered the initial phase of the
    > encounter. She was with another witness who shared her perceptions
    > and her experience, exactly as people do in normal life. Not only
    > that, both women suffered physical after- effects, and the other
    > witness experienced a mysterious burn above her coccyx that was
    > severe enough to require medical attention. In addition, researcher
    > Brian Vike has identified witnesses who observed unusual lights in
    > the sky in the area where Cynthia and the other witness were having
    > their encounter, at the time that it was taking place.
    >
    > Even if I did not have thousands of other abduction cases to point
    > to, I would have to be very thick-headed indeed to continue to
    > entertain the idea that there was anything imaginary or false about
    > this. It is real experience. It involves abduction by creatures that
    > do not walk the streets here on earth, and it is concerned with the
    > taking of tissue and/or sexual material from the victims.
    >
    > Not only that, the United States government is engaged in a ferocious
    > coverup of this activity. I say ferocious because I believe that a
    > lot of the debunking that goes on is carefully designed by
    > professional sociologists. What was done to me in Parade Magazine
    > showed sophistication and skill, and did immense damage to me. If I
    > could ever obtain proof, I would certainly sue the United States,
    > although I have no doubt that they would claim that it had been done
    > legally, in the name of national security.
    >
    > And they would be quite right to make this claim. The Air Force
    > doesn’t have a vendetta against me. It is evidently charged with
    > controlling public acceptance of the UFO phenomenon, and is simply
    > carrying out orders.
    >
    > But why? Why not warn us that somebody might enter our bedrooms in
    > the night and steal our most precious contents from us? Why not
    > attempt to protect us instead of seek to make it easier for them to
    > do this?
    >
    > The conclusion is inescapable that the government is making sure that
    > the public remains passive and thus vulnerable. The U.S. government is
    > proactively assisting the creatures that are attacking us. If there
    > was general public knowledge, people would take steps to protect
    > themselves. Ways and means could and would be found. If this was not
    > true, if we were indeed helpless, then there would be no reason for
    > the secrecy. The creatures would simply come and do their will in an
    > open and obvious way and that would be that.
    >
    > Government secrecy is a weapon. It is being used against us. When the
    > Air Force debunks and lies about UFOs and close encounters, it is
    > attacking the American people with a powerful and brutal weapon. When
    > the CIA lies and says it knows nothing about this, it is striking a
    > blow against the country it is supposed to serve.
    >
    > They aren’t doing this out of hatred of the American people or the
    > people of the world. They are doing it out of fear that, if they
    > don’t do it, we will suffer even worse consequences.
    >
    > What might they be? What danger would be great enough to turn a
    > government against its own people—indeed, its own species and its
    > world? My uncle, Col. E. M. Strieber, told me that he was aware of
    > the arrival of materials from the Roswell crash at Wright Field in
    > the summer of 1947. He also told me that he’d understood that the
    > secrecy initially came from concern that they might represent a new
    > type of Soviet craft, but later that there was a threat, if the
    > secret of the presence of these intruders was not kept, to destroy
    > the earth in an instant.
    >
    > General Arthur Exon, who was for many years my uncle’s commanding
    > officer, told me that he had been a member for the Air Force of a
    > committee that studied this situation for many years, and indeed, as
    > late as 1988, was still attending meetings at Wright-Patterson. He
    > said that his belief was that the secrecy was for a more positive
    > reason, which was that we would be culturally destroyed if we were
    > exposed to much higher visitor knowledge, much as primitive
    > civilizations have been destroyed on earth when exposed to
    > scientifically advanced cultures.
    >
    > As I have written in these columns before, I also believe that there
    > is another possible reason for the secrecy, which is that official
    > admission of the reality of the visitors might be a sort of trigger
    > that enables them to come swarming into our world—to actually make
    > our world part of theirs.
    >
    > Certainly, in dealing with an unknown as toxic as this one is on so
    > many different levels, any government would be extremely cautious. If
    > it found that it had to give up a little of the dignity of a few of
    > its people, and perhaps a few lives, in return for not causing the
    > collapse of civilization or worse, the total destruction of the
    > planet, then there is no question that it would decide to sacrifice
    > the lives.
    >
    > Unfortunately, I cannot tell you where the truth about these various
    > dangers lies. I can only tell you this: the visitors are entirely
    > real and they are here taking sexual material and tissues from human
    > beings. I am sorry that it has taken me so many years to feel that I
    > can make this statement unequivocally, but I am not given to
    > asserting things that I don’t think I can back up. I can back this
    > up. The evidence is sufficient.
    >
    > In addition, the U.S. government is actively covering up the
    > activities of whoever is doing this, denying that they exist and
    > seeking to destroy the reputations and credibility of anybody who
    > makes an efficient effort to convince the public otherwise. I think
    > that the operation that was carried out against me in the pages of
    > Parade magazine is sufficient evidence of this. But that is really
    > such a small part of the overall picture, it hardly even qualifies as
    > an iceberg tip. The evidence of coverup and official lying is
    > literally vast. It has been addressed elsewhere by many others, and,
    > except insofar as it concerns my own personal experience of it, is
    > not the subject of this journal entry.
    >
    > So, what is to be done? Should people continue to press for official
    > disclosure, even suspecting that the consequences could be extremely
    > dire?
    >
    > This is a powerful and important question, but it is one that I am
    > not yet prepared to answer. I do not have enough evidence, but I do
    > have some building ideas that I intend to work on. Chief among them
    > is a need, that strikes me as quite urgent, to understand what the
    > motives of our visitors might be. Why are they taking this material
    > from us?
    >
    > If we make that our next key question, then I think that we will also,
    > inevitably, gain knowledge of whether or not the coverup is a valid
    > means of protecting mankind, or another lie in a tissue of lies that
    > is designed not to protect us, but to make us vulnerable to somebody
    > who needs us a good deal more than we need them.
    >
    > Subscribers to Unknowncountry.com can listen to my second hypnosis
    > session in the subscriber section of this website. It can also be
    > stolen from there and spread widely, and passwords to this section
    > can be given away, as is being done, in order to reduce our income
    > from the website and thus our ability to keep it going.
    >
    > But, if you do this, please reflect on the importance of what you are
    > doing. You are helping the visitors and the government to accomplish
    > a task they must very much want to accomplish, which is to see my
    > voice silenced. Do you really want to help the rapists of mankind?
    >
    > In my next journal entry, I will get into the question of why they
    > don’t simply kill people like me and Budd Hopkins and the others who
    > are presenting credible and believable evidence to the public. We are
    > oppressed by the masters of the lie and their minions, no doubt of
    > it, but there is good out there, too, as we shall see, and it comes
    > from a very surprising direction.


    !
     
    Baron Maximillian von Schtuldeworfshiseundurheimh, Oct 19, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Lord Avner Williamsburr Smythe

    Re: Whitley Strieber

    Lord Avner Williamsburr Smythe, Oct 6, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    737
    Ubiquitous
    Oct 18, 2003
  2. Lord Avner Williamsburr Smythe

    Re: Whitley Strieber, Oct 11th 2003

    Lord Avner Williamsburr Smythe, Oct 14, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    541
    Lord Avner Williamsburr Smythe
    Oct 14, 2003
  3. Jill

    A remarkable breakthrough: Sony DSC-F828

    Jill, Oct 15, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    24
    Views:
    1,222
    PTRAVEL
    Oct 28, 2003
  4. REED BOXIN

    A breakthrough in lens technology: must read

    REED BOXIN, Mar 6, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    316
    Fred A. Miller
    Mar 7, 2004
  5.  @ . 

    Scientific breakthrough: magnetic lenses

     @ . , Apr 5, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    676
     @ . 
    Apr 5, 2004
Loading...

Share This Page