Re: Using Cisco 836 as ISDN Router

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Leif K?re, Apr 1, 2004.

  1. Leif K?re

    Leif K?re Guest

    (AnyBody43) wrote in message news:<>...
    > (Leif K?re) wrote in message news:<>...
    > > After checking the connection with the debug isdn q931 command i got
    > > the following;

    >
    > I am not an expert in this but since the ISDN layer 3 seems to be OK
    > you need to look at "debug ppp" with whatever options (all:) seem
    > appropriate. The most likely thing in my experience is an authentication
    > problem.
    >
    > deb ppp auth
    > deb ppp neg
    >
    > spring (possibly incorreectly) to mind.


    Forgot to add this in previous post. The result of a show ip route command

    Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0

    130.67.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
    C 130.67.246.180 is directly connected, Dialer0
    C 130.67.245.128 is directly connected, Dialer0
    10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    C 10.10.10.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
    S* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Dialer0
     
    Leif K?re, Apr 1, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Leif K?re

    Ivan Ostres Guest

    In article <>,
    says...
    > (AnyBody43) wrote in message news:<>...
    > > (Leif K?re) wrote in message news:<>...
    > > > After checking the connection with the debug isdn q931 command i got
    > > > the following;

    > >
    > > I am not an expert in this but since the ISDN layer 3 seems to be OK
    > > you need to look at "debug ppp" with whatever options (all:) seem
    > > appropriate. The most likely thing in my experience is an authentication
    > > problem.
    > >
    > > deb ppp auth
    > > deb ppp neg
    > >
    > > spring (possibly incorreectly) to mind.

    >
    > Forgot to add this in previous post. The result of a show ip route command
    >
    > Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0
    >
    > 130.67.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
    > C 130.67.246.180 is directly connected, Dialer0
    > C 130.67.245.128 is directly connected, Dialer0
    > 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    > C 10.10.10.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
    > S* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Dialer0
    >


    If I remember correctly from your config, you do not have a NAT. And you
    should have one...

    Search CCO for NAT keyword.

    --
    Ivan
     
    Ivan Ostres, Apr 1, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Thierry
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    3,191
    Stefan Dambeck
    Jan 27, 2004
  2. Christian Knoblauch

    Cisco 836 bri-isdn

    Christian Knoblauch, Feb 19, 2004, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    2,607
    Christian Knoblauch
    Feb 25, 2004
  3. Leif K?re

    Re: Using Cisco 836 as ISDN Router

    Leif K?re, Apr 1, 2004, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    480
    Leif K?re
    Apr 1, 2004
  4. Garry
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    552
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Axel_G=E4rtner?=
    Aug 16, 2005
  5. sync
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    623
Loading...

Share This Page