Re: Scenario

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Michael Voight, Jul 19, 2003.

  1. What are the masks of the routers?

    Munzir Khalid Khan wrote:
    > I have the following scenario
    >
    > I have two location City-1 and City-2
    >
    > on City-1 the following setup is performed.
    >
    > on cisco 1721 router
    >
    > ethernet ip 192.168.0.1
    >
    > Serial IP 10.1.1.1
    >
    > ip route 192.168.18.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2
    >
    > --------------------------------------------
    >
    > on city-2
    >
    > on cisco 1721
    >
    > ethernet IP 192.168.18.250
    > Serial 10.1.1.2
    >
    > IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1
    >
    > the result is both site serial can ping each other
    > both side ethernet can ping each other router IP's
    >
    > at city-2 all the workstations can ping 192.168.0.x network while router can
    > not ping 192.168.0.x, it can ping only upto the city-1 router 192.168.0.1
    > and not the entire network that is 192.168.0.x
    >
    > any idea why is that???
    >
    >
    >
     
    Michael Voight, Jul 19, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. it is /24 255.255.255.0 for Ethernet
    /30 for serial 255.255.255.252


    "Michael Voight" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > What are the masks of the routers?
    >
    > Munzir Khalid Khan wrote:
    > > I have the following scenario
    > >
    > > I have two location City-1 and City-2
    > >
    > > on City-1 the following setup is performed.
    > >
    > > on cisco 1721 router
    > >
    > > ethernet ip 192.168.0.1
    > >
    > > Serial IP 10.1.1.1
    > >
    > > ip route 192.168.18.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2
    > >
    > > --------------------------------------------
    > >
    > > on city-2
    > >
    > > on cisco 1721
    > >
    > > ethernet IP 192.168.18.250
    > > Serial 10.1.1.2
    > >
    > > IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1
    > >
    > > the result is both site serial can ping each other
    > > both side ethernet can ping each other router IP's
    > >
    > > at city-2 all the workstations can ping 192.168.0.x network while router

    can
    > > not ping 192.168.0.x, it can ping only upto the city-1 router

    192.168.0.1
    > > and not the entire network that is 192.168.0.x
    > >
    > > any idea why is that???
    > >
    > >
    > >

    >
     
    Munzir Khalid Khan, Jul 19, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. There still is enough information.
    The routing table of the involved devices and a sniffer trace might be
    helpful.

    Possible

    1. mask on client or server incorrect
    2. client, server, or in between device does not permit ping
    3. Broken client, server, or in between device


    Munzir Khalid Khan wrote:
    > it is /24 255.255.255.0 for Ethernet
    > /30 for serial 255.255.255.252
    >
    >
    > "Michael Voight" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    >
    >>What are the masks of the routers?
    >>
    >>Munzir Khalid Khan wrote:
    >>
    >>>I have the following scenario
    >>>
    >>>I have two location City-1 and City-2
    >>>
    >>>on City-1 the following setup is performed.
    >>>
    >>>on cisco 1721 router
    >>>
    >>>ethernet ip 192.168.0.1
    >>>
    >>>Serial IP 10.1.1.1
    >>>
    >>>ip route 192.168.18.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2
    >>>
    >>>--------------------------------------------
    >>>
    >>>on city-2
    >>>
    >>>on cisco 1721
    >>>
    >>>ethernet IP 192.168.18.250
    >>>Serial 10.1.1.2
    >>>
    >>>IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1
    >>>
    >>>the result is both site serial can ping each other
    >>>both side ethernet can ping each other router IP's
    >>>
    >>>at city-2 all the workstations can ping 192.168.0.x network while router

    >>

    > can
    >
    >>>not ping 192.168.0.x, it can ping only upto the city-1 router

    >>

    > 192.168.0.1
    >
    >>>and not the entire network that is 192.168.0.x
    >>>
    >>>any idea why is that???
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>

    >>

    >
    >
     
    Michael Voight, Jul 20, 2003
    #3
  4. Michael Voight

    Ciku Guest

    Try this:
    City-1
    serial 192.168.0.1/30
    ethernet 10.0.0.1/30
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.2

    City-2
    serial 192.168.0.2/30
    ethernet 10.0.1.1/30
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1

    It should work

    IP Addr 192.168.x.x is private IP and normaly it used for WAN IP and ip addr
    10.x.x.x is private IP for LAN

    "Munzir Khalid Khan" <> wrote in message
    news:3f190a91$...
    > it is /24 255.255.255.0 for Ethernet
    > /30 for serial 255.255.255.252
    >
    >
    > "Michael Voight" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > What are the masks of the routers?
    > >
    > > Munzir Khalid Khan wrote:
    > > > I have the following scenario
    > > >
    > > > I have two location City-1 and City-2
    > > >
    > > > on City-1 the following setup is performed.
    > > >
    > > > on cisco 1721 router
    > > >
    > > > ethernet ip 192.168.0.1
    > > >
    > > > Serial IP 10.1.1.1
    > > >
    > > > ip route 192.168.18.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2
    > > >
    > > > --------------------------------------------
    > > >
    > > > on city-2
    > > >
    > > > on cisco 1721
    > > >
    > > > ethernet IP 192.168.18.250
    > > > Serial 10.1.1.2
    > > >
    > > > IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1
    > > >
    > > > the result is both site serial can ping each other
    > > > both side ethernet can ping each other router IP's
    > > >
    > > > at city-2 all the workstations can ping 192.168.0.x network while

    router
    > can
    > > > not ping 192.168.0.x, it can ping only upto the city-1 router

    > 192.168.0.1
    > > > and not the entire network that is 192.168.0.x
    > > >
    > > > any idea why is that???
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >

    > >

    >
    >
     
    Ciku, Jul 20, 2003
    #4
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Trond Hindenes
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,174
    Trond Hindenes
    Jul 22, 2003
  2. Dejan Gambin
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    759
    Dejan Gambin
    Oct 16, 2003
  3. Afshin

    NAT on DVB based scenario

    Afshin, Oct 22, 2003, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    407
    Afshin
    Oct 22, 2003
  4. wonknose
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    688
    wonkcity
    Apr 20, 2004
  5. ae
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    601
Loading...

Share This Page