Re: RIPv2 between Cisco 851 and 871

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by bod43, Mar 9, 2009.

  1. bod43

    bod43 Guest

    On 9 Mar, 00:32, Paul <> wrote:
    > I have a small lab topology that can be viewed here:
    >
    > http://www.nyclimits.org/mynetwork/mynetwork.jpg
    >
    > Here is what I am trying to do:
    >
    > 1) Get RIP v2 working between routers R1 and R2.
    > 2) Have the routes of 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.4.1  advertised to R2.
    >
    > The problem I having is that R1 has no problems receiving info from R2 but R2 has problems receiving any updates from
    > R1.
    >
    > I want to save space in this post so I haven't posted the config. Here is some debug output though:
    >
    > R1 (Cisco 851)
    >
    > 1124912: .Mar  8 16:02:58.129 PCTime: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0..9 via Vlan1 (192.168.1.1)
    > 1124913: .Mar  8 16:02:58.129 PCTime: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
    > 1124914: .Mar  8 16:02:58.129 PCTime: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0..9 via Vlan1 (192.168.2.1)
    > 1124915: .Mar  8 16:02:58.129 PCTime: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
    > 1124916: .Mar  8 16:02:58.129 PCTime: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0..9 via Vlan1 (192.168.4.1)
    > 1124917: .Mar  8 16:02:58.129 PCTime: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
    > 1124945: .Mar  8 16:04:39.842 PCTime: RIP: received v2 update from 192.168.2.2 on Vlan1
    > 1124946: .Mar  8 16:04:39.846 PCTime:      192.168.3.0/24 via 0.0..0.0 in 1 hops
    > 1124947: .Mar  8 16:04:39.846 PCTime: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
    >
    > R2 (Cisco 871)
    >
    > *Mar  2 10:50:18.747: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via FastEthernet4 (192.168.2.2)
    > *Mar  2 10:50:18.747: RIP: build update entries
    > *Mar  2 10:50:18.747:   192.168.3.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
    > *Mar  2 10:50:18.747: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
    > *Mar  2 10:50:18.747: RIP: Update queued
    > *Mar  2 10:50:18.747: RIP: Update sent via FastEthernet4
    > *Mar  2 10:50:18.747: RIP: ignored v2 packet from 192.168.2.2 (sourced from one of our addresses)
    >
    > I have occasionally seen an error message: RIP: ignored the request received from unlisted network.
    >
    > My understanding is that all routes should be advertised between the 2 interfaces and everything should just work.
    >
    > The main questions I have is:
    >
    > 1) Why isn't R2 receiving updates? Is there something with the 851/71 that needs to be configured differently?
    >
    > My understanding is that all routes should be advertised between the 2 interfaces and everything should just work.
    >
    > --Paul


    I have not read and studied fully all of the detail and
    maybe I missed something, however:-

    From your diagram, the first thought is that
    192.168.2.1 may be a secondary
    address on R1. Dynamic
    routing protocols do not work with secondary
    addresses is the model that I use.

    Perhaps the source address fro the RIP from R1 is
    192.168.1.1 and R2 (192.168.2.2) is ignoring the
    updates.

    I doubt that many people read this group on 9600bps
    modems now so I would not worry about
    posting a couple of configs:)
     
    bod43, Mar 9, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. bod43

    bod43 Guest

    On 9 Mar, 03:37, Paul <> wrote:
    > Yes, it is a secondary address but I've not known this to be a problem with RIP. Perhaps someone else can confirm this?


    You might find -
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/11_3/np1/configuration/guide/1crip.html

    interesting. You should verify that later IOS behaviour has
    not changed.

    I have mostly used OSPF and it ignores secondary addresses.
    I wonder if "redistribute connected" includes them?
    I was surprised to note recently (studying obsolete rubbish
    for cisco exams) that not all routing protocols had similar
    behaviour. Sadly remembering obsolete rubbish for long enough
    to pass is proving to be quite tough:(

    Secondary addresses are in any case a horrible knudge.
     
    bod43, Mar 9, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. xlr8

    RipV2 & Subnets

    xlr8, Jun 4, 2005, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,084
    Hansang Bae
    Jun 8, 2005
  2. Douglas McIver

    PIX 501 or 851/871 router?

    Douglas McIver, Sep 11, 2005, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    3,379
    Walter Roberson
    Sep 12, 2005
  3. KB
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    627
  4. libra2222
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    836
    libra2222
    Sep 20, 2007
  5. Zedsquared
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    609
    Zedsquared
    Feb 3, 2010
Loading...

Share This Page