Re: Mike Stark, the computer crminal

Discussion in 'Computer Support' started by Desk Rabbit, Jan 5, 2009.

  1. Desk Rabbit

    Desk Rabbit Guest

    WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    > I just received notice from Yahoo this Mike Stark is more than just a
    > harasser, he's also a computer criminal forging emails to make them look
    > like he's sending them from Yahoo when he's actually not.
    >
    > Here's one of his crimes with full (forged) headers he continually sends, or
    > sent to me.
    >
    > Can you computer snoops take a look at this 'work of art' and let me know
    > the 411? Thank you, Scott.
    >
    > Return-Path: <>
    > X-Original-To:
    >
    > Delivered-To:
    > Received: from smtp06.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [206.71.160.249])
    > by iepop3-02.ixpres.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848B83A6088C
    > for <>; Sun,
    > 4 Jan 2009 17:48:58 -0800 (PST)
    > Received: from web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    > [68.142.207.250])
    > by smtp06.ixpres.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9004F315E51E
    > for <>; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    > Received: (qmail 65183 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2009 01:49:40 -0000
    > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
    > s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
    > h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
    > b=vAHSAzbzxk7tIn1Df9map2G7YJo6xziIvYDPEmJtx8EWMQNTLxmHRdD3py6tRSOxyjathES5dNW319QOEP7wNladRenU5WnGoWzGNZOb3o3I9LpmqEG2l9rE7u7QD86tq23BcZywrYPcIfmOzsyQ3kLx0RaDZWOYUB4Vc5Z9JPc=;
    > X-YMail-OSG:
    > mxK.jc0VM1kpiHLeCwIPNygRD8MhbgMmW9JeAK92ft04wNBNq2pd.D9IfDtlIezDkybXpOpQiX3vt79wih_m2OWeaKpN65re5.7H5V5uuIcv9TDhdKkyQFeJKJZ170WLi41V67Skv50UK9CLWpzOldZ6OzoYQTTLdupTTOx6YrBGLiima3AX1zy.Wt_t
    > Received: from [98.112.201.119] by web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
    > Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:49:40 PST
    > X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
    > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    > From: Mike Stark <>
    > Reply-To:
    > Subject: more lies...
    > To: Wereo Boy <>
    > MIME-Version: 1.0
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    > Message-ID: <>


    Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are forged
    and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?
     
    Desk Rabbit, Jan 5, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Desk Rabbit hurled:

    > WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    >> I just received notice from Yahoo this Mike Stark is more than just a
    >> harasser, he's also a computer criminal forging emails to make them
    >> look like he's sending them from Yahoo when he's actually not.
    >>
    >> Here's one of his crimes with full (forged) headers he continually
    >> sends, or sent to me.
    >>
    >> Can you computer snoops take a look at this 'work of art' and let me
    >> know the 411? Thank you, Scott.
    >>
    >> Return-Path: <>
    >> X-Original-To:
    >>
    >> Delivered-To:
    >> Received:
    >> from smtp06.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [206.71.160.249])
    >> by iepop3-02.ixpres.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848B83A6088C
    >> for
    >> <>;
    >> Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from
    >> web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    >> (web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.250])
    >> by smtp06.ixpres.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9004F315E51E
    >> for <>; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >> Received: (qmail 65183 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2009 01:49:40
    >> -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
    >> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
    >>
    >> h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
    >> b=vAHSAzbzxk7tIn1Df9map2G7YJo6xziIvYDPEmJtx8EWMQNTLxmHRdD3py6tRSOxyjathES5dNW319QOEP7wNladRenU5WnGoWzGNZOb3o3I9LpmqEG2l9rE7u7QD86tq23BcZywrYPcIfmOzsyQ3kLx0RaDZWOYUB4Vc5Z9JPc=;
    >> X-YMail-OSG:
    >> mxK.jc0VM1kpiHLeCwIPNygRD8MhbgMmW9JeAK92ft04wNBNq2pd.D9IfDtlIezDkybXpOpQiX3vt79wih_m2OWeaKpN65re5.7H5V5uuIcv9TDhdKkyQFeJKJZ170WLi41V67Skv50UK9CLWpzOldZ6OzoYQTTLdupTTOx6YrBGLiima3AX1zy.Wt_t
    >> Received: from [98.112.201.119] by web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com via
    >> HTTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:49:40 PST
    >> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
    >> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >> From: Mike Stark <>
    >> Reply-To:
    >> Subject: more lies...
    >> To: Wereo Boy <>
    >> MIME-Version: 1.0
    >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >> Message-ID: <>

    >
    > Looks like that came from Yahoo.


    > What makes you think they are forged
    > and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?


    Yahoo?
     
    Kain Rathbone, Jan 5, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. WeReo_ScoTTy exuded:

    > "Kain Rathbone" <> wrote in message
    > news:gjtejo$s4t$...
    >> Desk Rabbit hurled:
    >>
    >>> WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    >>>> I just received notice from Yahoo this Mike Stark is more than
    >>>> just a harasser, he's also a computer criminal forging emails to
    >>>> make them look like he's sending them from Yahoo when he's
    >>>> actually not. Here's one of his crimes with full (forged) headers he
    >>>> continually
    >>>> sends, or sent to me.
    >>>>
    >>>> Can you computer snoops take a look at this 'work of art' and let
    >>>> me know the 411? Thank you, Scott.
    >>>>
    >>>> Return-Path: <>
    >>>> X-Original-To:
    >>>>
    >>>> Delivered-To:
    >>>>
    >>>> Received: from smtp06.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [206.71.160.249])
    >>>> by iepop3-02.ixpres.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848B83A6088C
    >>>> for
    >>>> <>;
    >>>> Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from
    >>>> web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    >>>> (web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.250])
    >>>> by smtp06.ixpres.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9004F315E51E
    >>>> for <>; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800
    >>>> (PST) Received: (qmail 65183 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2009
    >>>> 01:49:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
    >>>> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
    >>>>
    >>>> h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
    >>>> b=vAHSAzbzxk7tIn1Df9map2G7YJo6xziIvYDPEmJtx8EWMQNTLxmHRdD3py6tRSOxyjathES5dNW319QOEP7wNladRenU5WnGoWzGNZOb3o3I9LpmqEG2l9rE7u7QD86tq23BcZywrYPcIfmOzsyQ3kLx0RaDZWOYUB4Vc5Z9JPc=;
    >>>> X-YMail-OSG:
    >>>> mxK.jc0VM1kpiHLeCwIPNygRD8MhbgMmW9JeAK92ft04wNBNq2pd.D9IfDtlIezDkybXpOpQiX3vt79wih_m2OWeaKpN65re5.7H5V5uuIcv9TDhdKkyQFeJKJZ170WLi41V67Skv50UK9CLWpzOldZ6OzoYQTTLdupTTOx6YrBGLiima3AX1zy.Wt_t
    >>>> Received: from [98.112.201.119] by web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com via
    >>>> HTTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:49:40 PST
    >>>> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
    >>>> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >>>> From: Mike Stark <>
    >>>> Reply-To:
    >>>> Subject: more lies...
    >>>> To: Wereo Boy <>
    >>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
    >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >>>> Message-ID: <>
    >>>
    >>> Looks like that came from Yahoo.

    >>
    >>> What makes you think they are forged
    >>> and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?

    >>
    >> Yahoo?

    > Can you believe it?


    Unfuckingbelievable.
     
    Grahame Welsh, Jan 5, 2009
    #3
  4. Desk Rabbit

    Desk Rabbit Guest

    WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    > "Desk Rabbit" <> wrote in message
    > news:gjtd8v$rbj$...
    >> WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    >>> I just received notice from Yahoo this Mike Stark is more than just a
    >>> harasser, he's also a computer criminal forging emails to make them look
    >>> like he's sending them from Yahoo when he's actually not.
    >>>
    >>> Here's one of his crimes with full (forged) headers he continually sends,
    >>> or sent to me.
    >>>
    >>> Can you computer snoops take a look at this 'work of art' and let me know
    >>> the 411? Thank you, Scott.
    >>>
    >>> Return-Path: <>
    >>> X-Original-To:
    >>>
    >>> Delivered-To:
    >>>
    >>> Received: from smtp06.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [206.71.160.249])
    >>> by iepop3-02.ixpres.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848B83A6088C
    >>> for <>;
    >>> Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:48:58 -0800 (PST)
    >>> Received: from web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    >>> [68.142.207.250])
    >>> by smtp06.ixpres.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9004F315E51E
    >>> for <>; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >>> Received: (qmail 65183 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2009 01:49:40 -0000
    >>> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
    >>> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
    >>>
    >>> h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
    >>>
    >>> b=vAHSAzbzxk7tIn1Df9map2G7YJo6xziIvYDPEmJtx8EWMQNTLxmHRdD3py6tRSOxyjathES5dNW319QOEP7wNladRenU5WnGoWzGNZOb3o3I9LpmqEG2l9rE7u7QD86tq23BcZywrYPcIfmOzsyQ3kLx0RaDZWOYUB4Vc5Z9JPc=;
    >>> X-YMail-OSG:
    >>> mxK.jc0VM1kpiHLeCwIPNygRD8MhbgMmW9JeAK92ft04wNBNq2pd.D9IfDtlIezDkybXpOpQiX3vt79wih_m2OWeaKpN65re5.7H5V5uuIcv9TDhdKkyQFeJKJZ170WLi41V67Skv50UK9CLWpzOldZ6OzoYQTTLdupTTOx6YrBGLiima3AX1zy.Wt_t
    >>> Received: from [98.112.201.119] by web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
    >>> Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:49:40 PST
    >>> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
    >>> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >>> From: Mike Stark <>
    >>> Reply-To:
    >>> Subject: more lies...
    >>> To: Wereo Boy <>
    >>> MIME-Version: 1.0
    >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >>> Message-ID: <>

    >> Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are forged and
    >> what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?

    > Anything you say, the opposite is true. Thanks for confirming.



    There is no evidence within those headers that this email is a fake. So
    once again I'll ask you,
    What makes you think they are forged and what did Yahoo say that makes
    you think they are forged?
     
    Desk Rabbit, Jan 5, 2009
    #4
  5. Desk Rabbit

    Dale Chapman Guest

    WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    news:iLv8l.41078$:

    > "Grahame Welsh" <> wrote in message
    > news:gjtmtk$1hn$...
    >> WeReo_ScoTTy exuded:
    >>
    >>> "Kain Rathbone" <> wrote in message
    >>> news:gjtejo$s4t$...
    >>>> Desk Rabbit hurled:
    >>>>
    >>>>> WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    >>>>>> I just received notice from Yahoo this Mike Stark is more than
    >>>>>> just a harasser, he's also a computer criminal forging emails to
    >>>>>> make them look like he's sending them from Yahoo when he's
    >>>>>> actually not. Here's one of his crimes with full (forged)
    >>>>>> headers he continually
    >>>>>> sends, or sent to me.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Can you computer snoops take a look at this 'work of art' and let
    >>>>>> me know the 411? Thank you, Scott.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Return-Path: <>
    >>>>>> X-Original-To:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Delivered-To:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Received: from smtp06.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com
    >>>>>> [206.71.160.249]) by iepop3-02.ixpres.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
    >>>>>> id 848B83A6088C for
    >>>>>> <>;
    >>>>>> Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from
    >>>>>> web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    >>>>>> (web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.250])
    >>>>>> by smtp06.ixpres.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9004F315E51E
    >>>>>> for <>; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800
    >>>>>> (PST) Received: (qmail 65183 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2009
    >>>>>> 01:49:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
    >>>>>> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
    >>>>>> b=vAHSAzbzxk7tIn1Df9map2G7YJo6xziIvYDPEmJtx8EWMQNTLxmHRdD3py6tRSOxyjathES5dNW319QOEP7wNladRenU5WnGoWzGNZOb3o3I9LpmqEG2l9rE7u7QD86tq23BcZywrYPcIfmOzsyQ3kLx0RaDZWOYUB4Vc5Z9JPc=;
    >>>>>> X-YMail-OSG:
    >>>>>> mxK.jc0VM1kpiHLeCwIPNygRD8MhbgMmW9JeAK92ft04wNBNq2pd.D9IfDtlIezDkybXpOpQiX3vt79wih_m2OWeaKpN65re5.7H5V5uuIcv9TDhdKkyQFeJKJZ170WLi41V67Skv50UK9CLWpzOldZ6OzoYQTTLdupTTOx6YrBGLiima3AX1zy.Wt_t
    >>>>>> Received: from [98.112.201.119] by web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    >>>>>> via HTTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:49:40 PST
    >>>>>> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
    >>>>>> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >>>>>> From: Mike Stark <>
    >>>>>> Reply-To:
    >>>>>> Subject: more lies...
    >>>>>> To: Wereo Boy <>
    >>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
    >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >>>>>> Message-ID: <>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Looks like that came from Yahoo.
    >>>>
    >>>>> What makes you think they are forged
    >>>>> and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?
    >>>>
    >>>> Yahoo?
    >>> Can you believe it?

    >>
    >> Unfuckingbelievable.

    > Another instance of computer crime directed towards the Wereo. The
    > Wereo handles awl and crushes awl in it's path.


    Ooo! Frightening!
     
    Dale Chapman, Jan 5, 2009
    #5
  6. Desk Rabbit

    Evan Platt Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0000, Desk Rabbit <>
    wrote:

    >Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are forged
    >and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?


    Scott suffers from multiple delusional paranoid schizophrenia.
    --
    To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious from my e-mail address.
     
    Evan Platt, Jan 5, 2009
    #6
  7. Desk Rabbit

    Mara Guest

    On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0000, Desk Rabbit <> wrote:

    <snip>
    >Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are forged
    >and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?


    Doesn't yahoo reply with that to every complaint? From the looks of my archives,
    it sure seems like it.

    --
    Goodbye, Army, dear old Army of the Potomac. Tattered and torn,
    you are crowned with the victor's laurels at last.
    -- Elisha Hunt Rhodes, Col. 2nd R. I., July 15, 1865
     
    Mara, Jan 5, 2009
    #7
  8. Mara <> wrote in message
    news::

    > On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0000, Desk Rabbit <>
    > wrote:
    >
    > <snip>
    >> Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are forged
    >> and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?

    >
    > Doesn't yahoo reply with that to every complaint? From the looks of
    > my archives, it sure seems like it.


    Shut it, Mary!
     
    Zachary Coghlin, Jan 5, 2009
    #8
  9. Desk Rabbit

    Desk Rabbit Guest

    WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    > "Desk Rabbit" <> wrote in message
    > news:gjtqi9$ng9$...
    >> WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    >>> "Desk Rabbit" <> wrote in message
    >>> news:gjtd8v$rbj$...
    >>>> WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    >>>>> I just received notice from Yahoo this Mike Stark is more than just a
    >>>>> harasser, he's also a computer criminal forging emails to make them
    >>>>> look like he's sending them from Yahoo when he's actually not.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Here's one of his crimes with full (forged) headers he continually
    >>>>> sends, or sent to me.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Can you computer snoops take a look at this 'work of art' and let me
    >>>>> know the 411? Thank you, Scott.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Return-Path: <>
    >>>>> X-Original-To:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Delivered-To:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Received: from smtp06.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [206.71.160.249])
    >>>>> by iepop3-02.ixpres.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848B83A6088C
    >>>>> for <>;
    >>>>> Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:48:58 -0800 (PST)
    >>>>> Received: from web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    >>>>> [68.142.207.250])
    >>>>> by smtp06.ixpres.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9004F315E51E
    >>>>> for <>; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >>>>> Received: (qmail 65183 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2009 01:49:40 -0000
    >>>>> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
    >>>>> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
    >>>>>
    >>>>> h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
    >>>>>
    >>>>> b=vAHSAzbzxk7tIn1Df9map2G7YJo6xziIvYDPEmJtx8EWMQNTLxmHRdD3py6tRSOxyjathES5dNW319QOEP7wNladRenU5WnGoWzGNZOb3o3I9LpmqEG2l9rE7u7QD86tq23BcZywrYPcIfmOzsyQ3kLx0RaDZWOYUB4Vc5Z9JPc=;
    >>>>> X-YMail-OSG:
    >>>>> mxK.jc0VM1kpiHLeCwIPNygRD8MhbgMmW9JeAK92ft04wNBNq2pd.D9IfDtlIezDkybXpOpQiX3vt79wih_m2OWeaKpN65re5.7H5V5uuIcv9TDhdKkyQFeJKJZ170WLi41V67Skv50UK9CLWpzOldZ6OzoYQTTLdupTTOx6YrBGLiima3AX1zy.Wt_t
    >>>>> Received: from [98.112.201.119] by web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com via
    >>>>> HTTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:49:40 PST
    >>>>> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
    >>>>> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >>>>> From: Mike Stark <>
    >>>>> Reply-To:
    >>>>> Subject: more lies...
    >>>>> To: Wereo Boy <>
    >>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
    >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >>>>> Message-ID: <>
    >>>> Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are forged
    >>>> and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?
    >>> Anything you say, the opposite is true. Thanks for confirming.

    >>
    >> There is no evidence within those headers that this email is a fake. So
    >> once again I'll ask you,
    >> What makes you think they are forged and what did Yahoo say that makes you
    >> think they are forged?

    > Because Yahoo told me they (or this) is forged. That is proof enough for me.
    > I just want someone here to review it.
    >
    >

    Utter bollocks. Why would he forge it anyway and then address it to you
    and put his correct name and email address in? It makes no sense to a
    logical sane mind. Ah, I see where the problem is now.......
     
    Desk Rabbit, Jan 6, 2009
    #9
  10. Desk Rabbit

    Dan C Guest

    On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:18:17 +0000, Desk Rabbit wrote:

    > Utter bollocks. Why would he forge it anyway and then address it to you
    > and put his correct name and email address in? It makes no sense to a
    > logical sane mind. Ah, I see where the problem is now.......


    Hey dumbass. Quit feeding the fucking troll.


    --
    "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
    The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
    Ahhhhhhh!: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/relieve.jpg
     
    Dan C, Jan 6, 2009
    #10
  11. Desk Rabbit

    Dan C Guest

    Dan C <> wrote in message
    news:p:

    > On Tue, [Revile] [Bow-wow] [Drone] [Drone] +0000, Desk Rabbit [breathe
    > fire]


    > [Drone] dumbass. Quit feeding the [moan] troll.
     
    Dan C, Jan 6, 2009
    #11
  12. Desk Rabbit

    Dan C Guest

    Dan C <> wrote in message
    news:p:

    > On FUCKING ANAL BUCCANEER! Tue, 06 Jan 2009 FUCKING BITCHY! 09:18:17
    > +0000, Desk Rabbit FUCKING CLAM DIGGER! BROTHEL-KEEPER! SLAPPER!
    > CONCUBINE! ASS BLOW! wrote: GNOME! BLANCMANGE! BALL-BREAKER!


    > Hey FUCKING BLACK MOUTH! dumbass. Quit feeding FUCKING FLAPPER! ACE
    > QUEEN! PIECE-OF-TAIL! the fucking troll. PENIS BREATH! BITCH'S
    > BASTARD!
     
    Dan C, Jan 6, 2009
    #12
  13. Desk Rabbit

    John Mercer Guest

    Mike Hunt <> wrote in message
    news::

    > Zachary Coghlin "contributed" in 24hoursupport.helpdesk:
    >
    >> Mara <> wrote in message
    >> news::
    >>
    >>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0000, Desk Rabbit <>
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> <snip>
    >>>> Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are
    >>>> forged and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?
    >>>
    >>> Doesn't yahoo reply with that to every complaint? From the looks of
    >>> my archives, it sure seems like it.

    >>
    >> Shut it, Mary!
    >>

    >
    > What? Her ****?


    You getting the same draft?
     
    John Mercer, Jan 6, 2009
    #13
  14. Desk Rabbit

    Lucas Bennie Guest

    WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    news:W0R8l.30845$:

    > Regards,
    >
    > Diamond


    FROGGER! FROGGER!! SPORGER! FROGGER!!

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!!!!!!

    > Yahoo! Customer Care
    >
    > 56736227
    >
    > For assistance with all Yahoo! services please visit:
    >
    > http://help.yahoo.com/
     
    Lucas Bennie, Jan 6, 2009
    #14
  15. WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    news:YkS8l.41514$:

    > "Zachary Coghlin" <> wrote in
    > message news:gju31p$96a$...
    >> Mara <> wrote in message
    >> news::
    >>
    >>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0000, Desk Rabbit <>
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> <snip>
    >>>> Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are
    >>>> forged and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?
    >>>
    >>> Doesn't yahoo reply with that to every complaint? From the looks of
    >>> my archives, it sure seems like it.

    >>
    >> Shut it, Mary!

    > No YOU shut it.


    Why don't you make him?
     
    Tommy Collier, Jan 7, 2009
    #15
  16. WeReo_ScoTTy dislodged:

    > "Lucas Bennie" <> wrote in message
    > news:gk0mid$s80$...
    >> WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    >> news:W0R8l.30845$:
    >>
    >>> Regards,
    >>>
    >>> Diamond

    >>
    >> FROGGER! FROGGER!! SPORGER! FROGGER!!
    >>
    >> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!!!!!!
    >>
    >>> Yahoo! Customer Care
    >>>
    >>> 56736227
    >>>
    >>> For assistance with all Yahoo! services please visit:
    >>>
    >>> http://help.yahoo.com/

    > I hope you mean HIM and not me. I believe I've proven my case that
    > these are forged-header emails from the sceeving computer criminal
    > "Mike Stark". These emails are very unwanted, but they do serve one
    > purpose. That's to sink the computer criminal/unwanted harasser.


    Are you having him sink to your level yet?
     
    Wim van Bladharker, Jan 7, 2009
    #16
  17. Desk Rabbit

    Desk Rabbit Guest

    WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    > "Mara" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    >> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0000, Desk Rabbit <> wrote:
    >>
    >> <snip>
    >>> Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are forged
    >>> and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?

    >> Doesn't yahoo reply with that to every complaint? From the looks of my
    >> archives,
    >> it sure seems like it.

    > Hi Mara,
    >
    > Thank you for your help. For all the naysayers, if there are any, I'd like
    > to see what they have to say about this:


    So you sent Yahoo an unrelated spam you got and then attributed the
    email you got back to Mike's unforged legitimate email. You really are a
    grade one moron.
     
    Desk Rabbit, Jan 7, 2009
    #17
  18. Desk Rabbit

    Kev Stratton Guest

    WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    news:qCA9l.737$:

    > "Grahame Welsh" <> wrote in message
    > news:gjtmtk$1hn$...
    >> WeReo_ScoTTy exuded:
    >>
    >>> "Kain Rathbone" <> wrote in message
    >>> news:gjtejo$s4t$...
    >>>> Desk Rabbit hurled:
    >>>>
    >>>>> WeReo_ScoTTy wrote:
    >>>>>> I just received notice from Yahoo this Mike Stark is more than
    >>>>>> just a harasser, he's also a computer criminal forging emails to
    >>>>>> make them look like he's sending them from Yahoo when he's
    >>>>>> actually not. Here's one of his crimes with full (forged)
    >>>>>> headers he continually
    >>>>>> sends, or sent to me.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Can you computer snoops take a look at this 'work of art' and let
    >>>>>> me know the 411? Thank you, Scott.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Return-Path: <>
    >>>>>> X-Original-To:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Delivered-To:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Received: from smtp06.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com
    >>>>>> [206.71.160.249]) by iepop3-02.ixpres.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
    >>>>>> id 848B83A6088C for
    >>>>>> <>;
    >>>>>> Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from
    >>>>>> web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    >>>>>> (web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.250])
    >>>>>> by smtp06.ixpres.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9004F315E51E
    >>>>>> for <>; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800
    >>>>>> (PST) Received: (qmail 65183 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2009
    >>>>>> 01:49:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
    >>>>>> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
    >>>>>> b=vAHSAzbzxk7tIn1Df9map2G7YJo6xziIvYDPEmJtx8EWMQNTLxmHRdD3py6tRSOxyjathES5dNW319QOEP7wNladRenU5WnGoWzGNZOb3o3I9LpmqEG2l9rE7u7QD86tq23BcZywrYPcIfmOzsyQ3kLx0RaDZWOYUB4Vc5Z9JPc=;
    >>>>>> X-YMail-OSG:
    >>>>>> mxK.jc0VM1kpiHLeCwIPNygRD8MhbgMmW9JeAK92ft04wNBNq2pd.D9IfDtlIezDkybXpOpQiX3vt79wih_m2OWeaKpN65re5.7H5V5uuIcv9TDhdKkyQFeJKJZ170WLi41V67Skv50UK9CLWpzOldZ6OzoYQTTLdupTTOx6YrBGLiima3AX1zy.Wt_t
    >>>>>> Received: from [98.112.201.119] by web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
    >>>>>> via HTTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:49:40 PST
    >>>>>> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
    >>>>>> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:49:40 -0800 (PST)
    >>>>>> From: Mike Stark <>
    >>>>>> Reply-To:
    >>>>>> Subject: more lies...
    >>>>>> To: Wereo Boy <>
    >>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
    >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >>>>>> Message-ID: <>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Looks like that came from Yahoo.
    >>>>
    >>>>> What makes you think they are forged
    >>>>> and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are forged?
    >>>>
    >>>> Yahoo?
    >>> Can you believe it?

    >>
    >> Unfuckingbelievable.

    > Anyway it looks like I got rid of him. But you know these fuckers
    > always have a way of coming back from their virtual gates.


    I got a hair in the gate once; That was chilling for the lady I was
    snapping.
     
    Kev Stratton, Jan 9, 2009
    #18
  19. WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    news:hzA9l.734$:

    > "Tommy Collier" <>
    > wrote in message news:...
    >> WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    >> news:YkS8l.41514$:
    >>
    >>> "Zachary Coghlin" <> wrote in
    >>> message news:gju31p$96a$...
    >>>> Mara <> wrote in message
    >>>> news::
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0000, Desk Rabbit <>
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> <snip>
    >>>>>> Looks like that came from Yahoo. What makes you think they are
    >>>>>> forged and what did Yahoo say that makes you think they are
    >>>>>> forged?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Doesn't yahoo reply with that to every complaint? From the looks
    >>>>> of my archives, it sure seems like it.
    >>>>
    >>>> Shut it, Mary!
    >>> No YOU shut it.

    >>
    >> Why don't you make him?

    > Why don't u shut up too?


    That was almost as effective as you and your 'delusion clashing with
    reality', the difference being the latter is omni-present.
     
    PaRa_WeReo_ScoTTies, Jan 9, 2009
    #19
  20. WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    news:ZzA9l.735$:

    > "Wim van Bladharker" <> wrote in message
    > news:gk1lb9$eev$...
    >> WeReo_ScoTTy dislodged:
    >>
    >>> "Lucas Bennie" <> wrote in message
    >>> news:gk0mid$s80$...
    >>>> WeReo_ScoTTy <> wrote in message
    >>>> news:W0R8l.30845$:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Regards,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Diamond
    >>>>
    >>>> FROGGER! FROGGER!! SPORGER! FROGGER!!
    >>>>
    >>>> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!!!!!!
    >>>>
    >>>>> Yahoo! Customer Care
    >>>>>
    >>>>> 56736227
    >>>>>
    >>>>> For assistance with all Yahoo! services please visit:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://help.yahoo.com/
    >>> I hope you mean HIM and not me. I believe I've proven my case that
    >>> these are forged-header emails from the sceeving computer criminal
    >>> "Mike Stark". These emails are very unwanted, but they do serve one
    >>> purpose. That's to sink the computer criminal/unwanted harasser.

    >>
    >> Are you having him sink to your level yet?

    > Hopefully he'll sink in Lake Huron.


    Why, is that the 'wettest'?
     
    PaRa_WeReo_ScoTTies, Jan 9, 2009
    #20
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. geothermal

    Re: "Mike" & "Mike"

    geothermal, Apr 9, 2004, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    510
  2. Re: Mike Stark, the computer crminal

    , Jan 5, 2009, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    419
  3. Dan C

    Re: Mike Stark, the computer crminal

    Dan C, Jan 5, 2009, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    436
    Bucky Breeder
    Jan 9, 2009
  4. David J Taylor

    Re: A Stark reminder of why P&S image quality lags

    David J Taylor, Apr 12, 2010, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    309
    whisky-dave
    Apr 13, 2010
  5. Replies:
    2
    Views:
    248
Loading...

Share This Page