Re: in-camera charging

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Ian Stirling, Jul 10, 2003.

  1. Ian Stirling

    Ian Stirling Guest

    Ihor <> wrote:
    > USB2 is definitely faster but I think it's more than 3-5 times faster.
    > Theoretically
    > USB1 transfer rate is about 12 MB/sec
    > USB2 is about 480 MB/sec
    > I don't know what the real transfer rate is, but theoretically it's
    > about 40 times fater.
    >


    Pretty much irrelevant, as no(?) cards are as fast as USB2.
    You only get a few times boost.

    --
    http://inquisitor.i.am/ | mailto: | Ian Stirling.
    ---------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------
    Tad Williams has an interesting new fantasy: http://www.shadowmarch.com/
     
    Ian Stirling, Jul 10, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Ron Hunter

    Re: in-camera charging

    Ron Hunter, Jul 10, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    788
    Ron Hunter
    Jul 10, 2003
  2. Graham

    Re: in-camera charging

    Graham, Jul 10, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    994
    Shooter
    Jul 10, 2003
  3. Abrasha

    Re: in-camera charging

    Abrasha, Jul 10, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    696
    Abrasha
    Jul 10, 2003
  4. Michael Meissner

    Re: in-camera charging

    Michael Meissner, Jul 10, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    916
    Michael Meissner
    Jul 10, 2003
  5. WP20032

    Re: in-camera charging

    WP20032, Jul 10, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,622
    Dave Martindale
    Jul 10, 2003
Loading...

Share This Page