[Q] NAS and L3 performance

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by hifur2002, Jan 9, 2004.

  1. hifur2002

    hifur2002 Guest

    Hello, experts,

    We are planning to build remote access environment by
    using Cisco AS5350 and Cat3750(L3), and got a concern if
    the performance is enough or not because our estimation of
    route table update on it would be very frequently, say
    more than 300 times/min. This remote access environment
    will be used by our end-users through ISDN cloud(roundrobin)
    and route information will be updated by distance vector
    type route protocol(not decided yet. recommend me if there is)

    Is this not a problem for both AS5350 and Cat3750 ?

    Thank you,
     
    hifur2002, Jan 9, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. hifur2002

    Ivan Ostres Guest

    In article <>, hifur2002
    @hotmail.com says...
    > Hello, experts,
    >
    > We are planning to build remote access environment by
    > using Cisco AS5350 and Cat3750(L3), and got a concern if
    > the performance is enough or not because our estimation of
    > route table update on it would be very frequently, say
    > more than 300 times/min. This remote access environment
    > will be used by our end-users through ISDN cloud(roundrobin)
    > and route information will be updated by distance vector
    > type route protocol(not decided yet. recommend me if there is)
    >


    Does this means that users have some network behind them that will be a
    part of *your* routing table, or just classic dial-in users (one user,
    one address)?

    Why don't you want to use Link-state routing protocol?

    --
    Ivan
     
    Ivan Ostres, Jan 9, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. hifur2002

    hifur2002 Guest

    Thanks for your reply. Our users are just classic dial-in users
    using fixed IP address assigned(out of our control). Their dial-in
    through ISDN will be handled by one of AS5350 box(there are four
    AS5350 boxes) to access server's network via L3s(Cat3750x2).
    Link-state routing protocol may be okay if our concern regarding
    performance issue is cleared.

    -hifur

    Ivan Ostres <> wrote in message news:<btm6pj$8muvr$-berlin.de>...
    > In article <>, hifur2002
    > @hotmail.com says...
    > > Hello, experts,
    > >
    > > We are planning to build remote access environment by
    > > using Cisco AS5350 and Cat3750(L3), and got a concern if
    > > the performance is enough or not because our estimation of
    > > route table update on it would be very frequently, say
    > > more than 300 times/min. This remote access environment
    > > will be used by our end-users through ISDN cloud(roundrobin)
    > > and route information will be updated by distance vector
    > > type route protocol(not decided yet. recommend me if there is)
    > >

    >
    > Does this means that users have some network behind them that will be a
    > part of *your* routing table, or just classic dial-in users (one user,
    > one address)?
    >
    > Why don't you want to use Link-state routing protocol?
     
    hifur2002, Jan 10, 2004
    #3
  4. Updating your routing table 300 times per second sounds
    like a bad idea to me. Why do you need to update
    your routing table just because end users dial in?
    Normally you would have them all be in the same subnet.

    Aaron

    ---

    ~ Hello, experts,
    ~
    ~ We are planning to build remote access environment by
    ~ using Cisco AS5350 and Cat3750(L3), and got a concern if
    ~ the performance is enough or not because our estimation of
    ~ route table update on it would be very frequently, say
    ~ more than 300 times/min. This remote access environment
    ~ will be used by our end-users through ISDN cloud(roundrobin)
    ~ and route information will be updated by distance vector
    ~ type route protocol(not decided yet. recommend me if there is)
    ~
    ~ Is this not a problem for both AS5350 and Cat3750 ?
    ~
    ~ Thank you,
     
    Aaron Leonard, Jan 12, 2004
    #4
  5. hifur2002

    hifur2002 Guest

    Could you please let me know more detail about the solution
    if it is not a NAT. I am not sure how Routers inside recognize
    the right route to return packet for incoming request through
    some of access routers(for dial-in). Any pointers would be much
    appreciated.

    Thank you,

    Aaron Leonard <> wrote in message news:<>...
    > Updating your routing table 300 times per second sounds
    > like a bad idea to me. Why do you need to update
    > your routing table just because end users dial in?
    > Normally you would have them all be in the same subnet.
    >
    > Aaron
    >
    > ---
    >
    > ~ Hello, experts,
    > ~
    > ~ We are planning to build remote access environment by
    > ~ using Cisco AS5350 and Cat3750(L3), and got a concern if
    > ~ the performance is enough or not because our estimation of
    > ~ route table update on it would be very frequently, say
    > ~ more than 300 times/min. This remote access environment
    > ~ will be used by our end-users through ISDN cloud(roundrobin)
    > ~ and route information will be updated by distance vector
    > ~ type route protocol(not decided yet. recommend me if there is)
    > ~
    > ~ Is this not a problem for both AS5350 and Cat3750 ?
    > ~
    > ~ Thank you,
     
    hifur2002, Jan 13, 2004
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Aaron
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    682
    Aaron
    Jan 14, 2004
  2. Richard Field

    Cisco Router/NAS and Windows IAS RADIUS

    Richard Field, Jan 22, 2004, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    5,858
    Sam Salhi [MSFT]
    Jan 23, 2004
  3. MCJonny
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    757
    MCJonny
    Nov 5, 2005
  4. Marc Elsen
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    418
    Marc Elsen
    Jan 18, 2007
  5. thing

    Performance of small NAS boxes

    thing, May 25, 2009, in forum: NZ Computing
    Replies:
    11
    Views:
    1,307
    ~misfit~
    May 29, 2009
Loading...

Share This Page